
What's happening this week? And weren't those interviews conducted a while ago? |
Is the second part of the documentary available on YouTube? I can’t even find the first one anymore. Not sure whether it was pulled or if it’s been buried. |
I actually think the documentary bolsters a lot of Meghan's claims and places her and Harry definitively on the right side of history. They come off very sympathetically, while William comes out looking the worst of all. |
It's been pulled, along with a 5 part podcast which was going to be released after episode 2. Not a good look for a publicly funded broadcaster to serve as a meghaphone for a rich and powerful woman accused of bullying, while giving no airtime to her alleged victims. ![]() |
It wasn't pulled. Both parts aired. BBC however is not making any of the content available online. They did pull the podcast which was supposed to air. The first part went all in on lazy William in a way I've never seen, the grief the palace must have caused to get them to close off both parts from public online consumption must have been crazy. ![]() |
My theory is that the announcement that Meghan won her appeal (Thursday is going to be release) already filtered its way. Palace is bracing and just begging for leniency.
Really they're getting attacked on all sides. The BBC two part special on William/Harry briefing aired on 22nd and 29th of November. Ghislaine Maxwell's trial started on the 30th of November. Barbados ditched the Queen on the 29th of November permanently. Hasn't even been six months since Phillip's death. Queen hasn't been seen in public for 90+ days. Meghan won all but her most major court case this year as well. London bridge is falling and I don't just mean one bloody woman. |
|
|
A legal victory is a legal victory. As anyone will tell you. ![]() |
But her stock in trade is public relations. And she’s not doing well there. |
Meh, the whole point of Meghan going to court in the first place was to defend her reputation, and it seems she has only further tarnished it in this process, legal victory or not. |
Umm, no it was not. That was the British tabloids wet dream. Seeing her on the stand. Face to face with her 'scorned' father. So they could write headline after headline on it. Didn't happen. She went to court to establish the legal right to her personal property and she got it. |
I find this point amusing. If she was the wife of the Governor of New York - yeah, that would be a problem. But public relations in a constitutional monarchy? As the Brits can you tell, they've had some crazy Kings, Queens, and royals - doesn't matter a wink what their 'public relations' are. That's why its silly IMO as an American to support such a farce. If you've got a crazy vengeful dunce as a heir you're just stuck with him or her for 75 odd years until the next one comes along. At least we got rid of ours in 4 years or less. |
Princes and the Press both parts. Part One was most interesting - about the back deals between Diana's sons and the press and whatnot. Part Two was mostly the rota complaining about the Sussexs not allowing the press to make money off them.
|
Yeah, see, I’m guessing none of us would have married into it. I’m mixed race and have heard of the subcontinent of India and would have done more research besides, “I ask thee, is he kind?” So your idea about support is false. |