Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous[b wrote:]I think if BK gets through women need to take action. We need a war on conservative men who support this PoS and the bigger PoS Trump.[[/b]/quote]


Well you're going to have to declare war on women too, because I along with many other women do not believe that there is enough evidence to assume that Kavanaugh is guilty.

You are being willfully ignorant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Justice Stevens just came out and said Kavanaugh is unqualified based on his Senate hearing performance.

Yeah, Republicans don't care. They've got winning to do.

[Anonymous]

Just dawned on me--Ford reported an assault Kavanaugh never happened. Re: the yearbook, Kavanaugh's lawyer reported a kiss form Renate that Renate says never happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Manchin will be yes. Have you people been to wv?

If HeitKamp is a NO what makes you think Manchin won't be?

He wants to keep being a US Senator. Heitkamp is done regardless of her vote.

WV is the least diverse state in the country. Ironically Manchin leading the polls helps Kavanaugh's chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous[b wrote:]I think if BK gets through women need to take action. We need a war on conservative men who support this PoS and the bigger PoS Trump.[[/b]/quote]


Well you're going to have to declare war on women too, because I along with many other women do not believe that there is enough evidence to assume that Kavanaugh is guilty.

You are being willfully ignorant.

Yes a war on men! It’s times, down with men!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous[b wrote:]I think if BK gets through women need to take action. We need a war on conservative men who support this PoS and the bigger PoS Trump.[[/b]/quote]


Well you're going to have to declare war on women too, because I along with many other women do not believe that there is enough evidence to assume that Kavanaugh is guilty.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who defend this creep are gross. And yes, I'm consistent... When Bill Clinton lied under oath I thought it was right to impeach him. Here Bart/Brett lied multiple times and treated a coequal branch of government like s*it on his shoe. But oh well, Republicans overlook it because he's part of their tribe and because apparently sexual assault is no biggie if you're a drunk teen. Hypocrites.

+1 what do you expect from a bunch of old guys who keep giving Trump mulligans on all his moral failings. Most probably don't think sexually assaulting a women is a big deal anyways.

This. Many republican women don't care about the alledged assault, the drinking or the lying either.

My Republican evangelical friends who I know were assaulted in college (one had an abortion, as the result of a drunken date rape) are all announcing they are getting off social media for a few weeks. I bet they are. They know all their old friends know and will hopefully not say one word.

I think those people have this quaint notion rape is when a stranger wielding a knife or gun jumps out and violently drags a woman off. But if it's "just" a drunk boy who puts his weenie in a drunk woman (a la Brock the rapist) then it's not actually rape. Or if a giddy frat boy goes and grabs a woman by her crotch and then tries to pull her shirt off, no big deal! It's just vestiges of caveman interaction, ha ha, lighten up! And really, if it's an upper class white guy, especially if he's a Republican, then of course it's not assault if he pushes her down and tries to penetrate her. You should feel complimented a guy wants to grind on you!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous[b wrote:]I think if BK gets through women need to take action. We need a war on conservative men who support this PoS and the bigger PoS Trump.[[/b]/quote]


Well you're going to have to declare war on women too, because I along with many other women do not believe that there is enough evidence to assume that Kavanaugh is guilty.

You are being willfully ignorant.

You are kidding! You are calling someone, who says there is not enough evidence to assume guilt is being willfully ignorant?
There is certainly someone who is ignorant in this situation. But, it is not the pp. Look in the mirror, friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just dawned on me--Ford reported an assault Kavanaugh never happened. Re: the yearbook, Kavanaugh's lawyer reported a kiss form Renate that Renate says never happened.

Uh-oh. Who's lying, Renate or Kav?

Kav supporters, tell us who to believe! Come on, I know you have an opinion. Is Renate a liar?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just dawned on me--Ford reported an assault Kavanaugh never happened. Re: the yearbook, Kavanaugh's lawyer reported a kiss form Renate that Renate says never happened.

Uh-oh. Who's lying, Renate or Kav?

Kav supporters, tell us who to believe! Come on, I know you have an opinion. Is Renate a liar?

Is kissing part of the devil's triangle?

[Anonymous]

The letter from the law professors opposing Kavanaugh now has OVER 2,400 SIGNATURES.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/03/opinion/kavanaugh-law-professors-letter.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

And retired Justice John Paul Stevens, who has changed his mind on Kavanaugh, actually wrote a chapter in his book, praising one of Kavanaugh's decisions.

I hope this helps convince Senators how completely disqualifying Kavanaugh's performance in the hearing was. It shouldn't be this close.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The letter from the law professors opposing Kavanaugh now has OVER 2,400 SIGNATURES.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/03/opinion/kavanaugh-law-professors-letter.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

And retired Justice John Paul Stevens, who has changed his mind on Kavanaugh, actually wrote a chapter in his book, praising one of Kavanaugh's decisions.

I hope this helps convince Senators how completely disqualifying Kavanaugh's performance in the hearing was. It shouldn't be this close.

Most of the law professors probably don’t know a courtroom from a restroom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The letter from the law professors opposing Kavanaugh now has OVER 2,400 SIGNATURES.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/03/opinion/kavanaugh-law-professors-letter.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

And retired Justice John Paul Stevens, who has changed his mind on Kavanaugh, actually wrote a chapter in his book, praising one of Kavanaugh's decisions.

I hope this helps convince Senators how completely disqualifying Kavanaugh's performance in the hearing was. It shouldn't be this close.

There was not a single Democratic senator who came out in support of Kavanaugh after the initial hearing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley is an old coot.

I liked how he called out the media today.
He explained that he has had protesters in his office every day for the past 2 weeks. People FOR Kavanaugh’s confirmation and people AGAINST. The people FOR his nomination wanted to talk to the media. The media refused because they were only interested in speaking to people who were against Kavanaugh.

Media bias at its finest. And, on full display to the American people.

I’m so glad he called them out on their gross bias. Good for him. Can you imagine if the NYT or Post ran a story about all the people who feel Kavanaugh has been treated abominably? It will be a cold day in hell before they actually report both sides.

You're too easy. Get your fur coat on!


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/02/amid-allegations-against-kavanaugh-worry-about-future-boys-men/?utm_term=.5000c4267299

https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/09/21/us/ap-us-supreme-court-kavanaugh-women.html?login=smartlock&auth=login-smartlock

FWI, both the post and the times ran this AP story:
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/09/29/us/ap-us-supreme-court-kavanaugh-women-supporters.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who defend this creep are gross. And yes, I'm consistent... When Bill Clinton lied under oath I thought it was right to impeach him. Here Bart/Brett lied multiple times and treated a coequal branch of government like s*it on his shoe. But oh well, Republicans overlook it because he's part of their tribe and because apparently sexual assault is no biggie if you're a drunk teen. Hypocrites.

+1 what do you expect from a bunch of old guys who keep giving Trump mulligans on all his moral failings. Most probably don't think sexually assaulting a women is a big deal anyways.

This. Many republican women don't care about the alledged assault, the drinking or the lying either.

My Republican evangelical friends who I know were assaulted in college (one had an abortion, as the result of a drunken date rape) are all announcing they are getting off social media for a few weeks. I bet they are. They know all their old friends know and will hopefully not say one word.

I think those people have this quaint notion rape is when a stranger wielding a knife or gun jumps out and violently drags a woman off. But if it's "just" a drunk boy who puts his weenie in a drunk woman (a la Brock the rapist) then it's not actually rape. Or if a giddy frat boy goes and grabs a woman by her crotch and then tries to pull her shirt off, no big deal! It's just vestiges of caveman interaction, ha ha, lighten up! And really, if it's an upper class white guy, especially if he's a Republican, then of course it's not assault if he pushes her down and tries to penetrate her. You should feel complimented a guy wants to grind on you!!

No, it’s actually much simpler than that. We don’t like drunks. We don’t like sexual assaulters. And, we don’t like rapists.
We also don’t like for ANYBODY to be convicted, even in the court of public opinion, when there is no hard evidence to support the accusation. And, we don’t like mobs dragging a good man’s name through the mud simply because they “believe her” even when there is unsubstantiated and uncorroborated evidence. And, we don’t like this good man’s family being a target of mocking. And, we don’t like mobs of people accosting elected officials because THEY think they have a larger 1st Amendment right to do so.