Hayfield Football Coach Fired

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the people who are meant to check where a student lives calls the stand in parent/student to tell them when they will come and visit to check they definitely live there?
Using this same logic - can parents who’s children are redistricted out of their current school do the same?

I wonder about this too. Residency checks came up at an STAC meeting earlier in the school year and Reid promised to "look into it". Most likely, the optics would be terrible if they actually started cracking down on kids who don't live in boundary.

What's an STAC meeting?

Superintendent’s Teacher Advisory Council. A representative is named for each school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is funny that the top two threads on FCPS DCUM are about Hayfield and boundary reassessment, but the Hayfield situation shows that FCPS does practically nothing to enforce boundaries in the first place. The Hayfield "investigation" was triggered by social media posts associated with massive sports migration, but I can only assume that many individual students are attending schools outside of their boundaries with no investigation at all.

If FCPS doesn't know how many students actually live in a given school boundary, and won't enforce the boundaries anyway, what is the point of spending so much time and money on redrawing the boundaries?

Boundary fraud is generally not a huge issue for the county although it does happen occasionally, and it is checked and enforced when it happens (when the school knows about it). This issue is really something else.

[Anonymous]

I think there is a decent amount if boundary fraud not related to sports. We know several kids who should be in schools in different jurisdictions using other addresses to attend fcos schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think there is a decent amount if boundary fraud not related to sports. We know several kids who should be in schools in different jurisdictions using other addresses to attend fcos schools.

If you report them, they will be moved. But you won't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think there is a decent amount if boundary fraud not related to sports. We know several kids who should be in schools in different jurisdictions using other addresses to attend fcos schools.

If you report them, they will be moved. But you won't.

Nope not my business.

[Anonymous]

Scoreboard check.

The game has not even started, but it is showing:

Hayfield - 40
Edison - 0

#Hayfieldby40

Y'all stay mad, but you stay beat.

[Anonymous]

Exactly. The same parents complaining about recruiting are the same pearl-clutching parents running up to the center office or Gatehouse requesting fake pupil-placements, fake IEPs, fake school transfers, fake principal one-off approvals.

GTFOH. When we do what y'all do, we are cheaters. When y'all do it, it's under the banner of student advocacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly. The same parents complaining about recruiting are the same pearl-clutching parents running up to the center office or Gatehouse requesting fake pupil-placements, fake IEPs, fake school transfers, fake principal one-off approvals.

GTFOH. When we do what y'all do, we are cheaters. When y'all do it, it's under the banner of student advocacy.

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those wondering Ryan McElveen's letter attacking FCPS investigation has over 400+ likes as of now on Twitter, while poor Meren's defending the investigation on Facebook has ZERO likes.

In fairness no one is on FB. You'd have to compare same social media to same social media. In 400 is low for a place like FCPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those wondering Ryan McElveen's letter attacking FCPS investigation has over 400+ likes as of now on Twitter, while poor Meren's defending the investigation on Facebook has ZERO likes.

Link to meren’s post? I saw Anderson posted along the lines of McElveen. Wish more of the members had a little courage or integrity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those wondering Ryan McElveen's letter attacking FCPS investigation has over 400+ likes as of now on Twitter, while poor Meren's defending the investigation on Facebook has ZERO likes.

In fairness no one is on FB. You'd have to compare same social media to same social media. In 400 is low for a place like FCPS.

Not lately. X has lost innumerable users.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Scoreboard check.

The game has not even started, but it is showing:

Hayfield - 40
Edison - 0

#Hayfieldby40

Y'all stay mad, but you stay beat.

We are second hand cringing in embarassment at how tacky the Hayfield football cheater parents behave. Serious cringe. So low class and just...tacky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly. The same parents complaining about recruiting are the same pearl-clutching parents running up to the center office or Gatehouse requesting fake pupil-placements, fake IEPs, fake school transfers, fake principal one-off approvals.

GTFOH. When we do what y'all do, we are cheaters. When y'all do it, it's under the banner of student advocacy.

Oh, post that! Who has link to the story of the HS principals recruiting 31 fake IEP kids? I missed that one!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly. The same parents complaining about recruiting are the same pearl-clutching parents running up to the center office or Gatehouse requesting fake pupil-placements, fake IEPs, fake school transfers, fake principal one-off approvals.

GTFOH. When we do what y'all do, we are cheaters. When y'all do it, it's under the banner of student advocacy.

All of those things you listed are legal ways to transfer for FCPS residents.

Out of district and out of state kids using fake addresses or lying about homelessness to transfer into FCPS is not legal. They are not FCPS students or residents.

Two completely unrelated things.

[Anonymous]

I wonder how the real Hayfield parents feel about all this scandal.