Ah, you think the old “I’m rubber, you’re glue” insult will erase decades of forced birthers’ opposition to caring for pregnant women, infants, children and their general disregard for life? Just because you have drunk the Kool Aid doesn’t mean everyone else shares your culty beliefs. |
Regardless of any name-calling on your part, people who are opposed to abortion on demand are not viewing children as a punishment. |
No ma’am. Or sir? People like the PP and me view forced birth as punishment. Babies are a gift, when they are born. But childbirth needs to be a choice. Make abortion easily available in the first trimester and you’ll have more wanted babies and fewer suffering children. |
Why would they? YOU and they are not carrying them. So it's easy for you to not hold that view. |
Your analogy is faulty on many levels. The first is that you are comparing decisions a woman makes about her own body (abortion) to decisions a woman may make about another human being who lives separately in its own body (parenting). Your analogy ignores the fact that, legally, we allow parents to make all kinds of parenting decisions that are often thought of as “bad” decisions - to withhold medical treatment or restrict education, for example. Finally, your analogy rests on the idea that somehow women as a class of human beings are incapable of making good decisions about their own bodies. I personally think this is wrong. Women exercising the right to abortions are making very complex calculations about their lifelong ability to rear a child - decisions so complex that I don’t believe the state could ever be an adequate substitute decision-maker. If your response to this is some version of - “but the fetus is a person also and deserves protection equal to the mother”, please know that you are advancing a very specific religious view that is inconsistent with Jewish, Hindu and other faiths and is ahistorical in the US (where abortion was widely legal if done before quickening around the fourth month of pregnancy and had not begun to be outlawed until the mid to late 1800s) |
No, it really is. It is absolutely what is at stake in this decision. I don’t know what other “it” you’re talking about. Now, I firmly believe that state has some interest in regulating abortion, but it must be weighed against the right women have to bodily autonomy (healthcare). That’s the existing standard. You should support that. Especially if you think the state should protect children’s rights. This opinion does not allow that women have those rights, what makes you think kids have any either in a post Dobbs world. |
|
Have a priest baptize your uterus to be safe |
No, you are pro-femicide, your answer is literally "die it out." You would have condemned this doctor to die: https://slate.com/technology/2022/05/iud-pregnancy-possible-complications-roe-overturn-abortion.html. |
|
Do you think this decision would force parents to allow invasive medical care for infants that are born with severe medical problems? I can see that happening. If you forced me to give birth to a child I knew had very little chance, could you force me to make that child suffer through surgeries and other interventions after birth?
This is all so messed up. |
Your right. An 11 year old raped by her dad gets to become a mother as a reward for gods love. Right? |
Don't forget the cherry on top!!! YOU get to pay for it. For years and years. You will now be financially responsible for a child that has survived but needs around the clock medical care just to sustain life. Feeding tubes oxygen all of it and guess who gets to pay. You do!. Guess what happens to your other children?....... They're going to suffer because all of your financial, emotional, and physical resources will be on trying to keep this one child alive. What cost? |
Sadly, I’m well aware of this. Quite close to home |
|
It used to be legal to beat your kids. Does that mean parents have a right to do it? Alito’s reasoning is trash.
Women have a right to life, liberty and property. All of those rights are implicate sin any attempt by the government to prevent her from accessing abortion. |
-implicated in- Obviously auto correct knows I’m debating a Catholic in here. |