Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Blake is a narcissist and everything, but I wonder if there's a very very very small part of her brain -- maybe 0.1% -- that questions whether she was sexually harassed and realizes Justin is innocent.

Do you ever wonder if there is a small part of Justin's brain that questions whether he made any mistakes here? I certainly hope so. He ruined his entire career -- and I mean ruined -- with a series of weird, inappropriate, and frankly stupid behaviors. Was it SH? I don't know, I'm not a legal expert. Do I think walking in on an actress while she's topless and refusing to leave or at least face away is totally inappropriate behavior? YES. Telling your co-star (as her director) that you want to add a scene where your character (an abuser) climaxes simultaneously with her character, because that's what you and your wife do? Calling multiple actresses on set "sexy" or "hot"? Trying to convince an actress to do a birth scene with unscripted nudity by claiming "it's not normal" for women to give birth in hospital gowns? Asking a pair of actors if they "practiced" for their sex scene because it was so "hot"?

Do you think Baldoni ever looks at these incidents written out in Lively's filings and thinks, "huh, I can see now how that might be considered offensive or uncomfortable for the person on the receiving end of these behaviors." Ever?

There's no question that he does, because he prefaces with stuff like "I know I'm not supposed to say this..."

He jokes about the HR stuff *while* making the inappropriate comments. He tips other guys off about getting cancelled. He knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love how the Blake bots dismiss the experiences of people on Baldoni’s side, saying it’s irrelevant, when they’ve been constantly bringing up their own personal experience with SH in the workplace in this thread and how Justin reminds them of toxic people in their life. Just like Blake, rules for thee but not for me.

I'm a woman. We don't have to have a side. I've been sexually harassed at work multiple times. Do you want to dismiss my experience? Had a guy follow me around telling me he wanted to give me a pearl necklace. Got cornered and trapped in an elevator with another guy at work who wanted to "push all my buttons" and on and on. But dismissing her because she's blond and rich is ridiculous. Why even bring it up? Let the courts sort it out before calling her a dirty liar.

I’m a woman. I don’t care at all what happened to you, never will; it isn’t remotely relevant to anything here.

Cool. I feel the same and don't know why the DV person showed up to bore us with her "experience" that has nothing to do with this case. I don't care about either of you, tit for tat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Blake is a narcissist and everything, but I wonder if there's a very very very small part of her brain -- maybe 0.1% -- that questions whether she was sexually harassed and realizes Justin is innocent.

Do you ever wonder if there is a small part of Justin's brain that questions whether he made any mistakes here? I certainly hope so. He ruined his entire career -- and I mean ruined -- with a series of weird, inappropriate, and frankly stupid behaviors. Was it SH? I don't know, I'm not a legal expert. Do I think walking in on an actress while she's topless and refusing to leave or at least face away is totally inappropriate behavior? YES. Telling your co-star (as her director) that you want to add a scene where your character (an abuser) climaxes simultaneously with her character, because that's what you and your wife do? Calling multiple actresses on set "sexy" or "hot"? Trying to convince an actress to do a birth scene with unscripted nudity by claiming "it's not normal" for women to give birth in hospital gowns? Asking a pair of actors if they "practiced" for their sex scene because it was so "hot"?

Do you think Baldoni ever looks at these incidents written out in Lively's filings and thinks, "huh, I can see now how that might be considered offensive or uncomfortable for the person on the receiving end of these behaviors." Ever?

Nah, 'cause Baldoni is innocent.

Cuz he's hot and she's not? That's about as deep as the bot brains go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Blake is a narcissist and everything, but I wonder if there's a very very very small part of her brain -- maybe 0.1% -- that questions whether she was sexually harassed and realizes Justin is innocent.

Do you ever wonder if there is a small part of Justin's brain that questions whether he made any mistakes here? I certainly hope so. He ruined his entire career -- and I mean ruined -- with a series of weird, inappropriate, and frankly stupid behaviors. Was it SH? I don't know, I'm not a legal expert. Do I think walking in on an actress while she's topless and refusing to leave or at least face away is totally inappropriate behavior? YES. Telling your co-star (as her director) that you want to add a scene where your character (an abuser) climaxes simultaneously with her character, because that's what you and your wife do? Calling multiple actresses on set "sexy" or "hot"? Trying to convince an actress to do a birth scene with unscripted nudity by claiming "it's not normal" for women to give birth in hospital gowns? Asking a pair of actors if they "practiced" for their sex scene because it was so "hot"?

Do you think Baldoni ever looks at these incidents written out in Lively's filings and thinks, "huh, I can see now how that might be considered offensive or uncomfortable for the person on the receiving end of these behaviors." Ever?

You definitely aren’t a legal expert and apparently can’t even read because the walking in allegation was against Jamey Heath not Baldoni. Once I realized you were that stupid, I didn’t bother to read the rest, but trust you didn’t get that right either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Blake is a narcissist and everything, but I wonder if there's a very very very small part of her brain -- maybe 0.1% -- that questions whether she was sexually harassed and realizes Justin is innocent.

Do you ever wonder if there is a small part of Justin's brain that questions whether he made any mistakes here? I certainly hope so. He ruined his entire career -- and I mean ruined -- with a series of weird, inappropriate, and frankly stupid behaviors. Was it SH? I don't know, I'm not a legal expert. Do I think walking in on an actress while she's topless and refusing to leave or at least face away is totally inappropriate behavior? YES. Telling your co-star (as her director) that you want to add a scene where your character (an abuser) climaxes simultaneously with her character, because that's what you and your wife do? Calling multiple actresses on set "sexy" or "hot"? Trying to convince an actress to do a birth scene with unscripted nudity by claiming "it's not normal" for women to give birth in hospital gowns? Asking a pair of actors if they "practiced" for their sex scene because it was so "hot"?

Do you think Baldoni ever looks at these incidents written out in Lively's filings and thinks, "huh, I can see now how that might be considered offensive or uncomfortable for the person on the receiving end of these behaviors." Ever?

You definitely aren’t a legal expert and apparently can’t even read because the walking in allegation was against Jamey Heath not Baldoni. Once I realized you were that stupid, I didn’t bother to read the rest, but trust you didn’t get that right either.

lmao +1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Blake is a narcissist and everything, but I wonder if there's a very very very small part of her brain -- maybe 0.1% -- that questions whether she was sexually harassed and realizes Justin is innocent.

Do you ever wonder if there is a small part of Justin's brain that questions whether he made any mistakes here? I certainly hope so. He ruined his entire career -- and I mean ruined -- with a series of weird, inappropriate, and frankly stupid behaviors. Was it SH? I don't know, I'm not a legal expert. Do I think walking in on an actress while she's topless and refusing to leave or at least face away is totally inappropriate behavior? YES. Telling your co-star (as her director) that you want to add a scene where your character (an abuser) climaxes simultaneously with her character, because that's what you and your wife do? Calling multiple actresses on set "sexy" or "hot"? Trying to convince an actress to do a birth scene with unscripted nudity by claiming "it's not normal" for women to give birth in hospital gowns? Asking a pair of actors if they "practiced" for their sex scene because it was so "hot"?

Do you think Baldoni ever looks at these incidents written out in Lively's filings and thinks, "huh, I can see now how that might be considered offensive or uncomfortable for the person on the receiving end of these behaviors." Ever?

Nah, 'cause Baldoni is innocent.

Cuz he's hot and she's not? That's about as deep as the bot brains go.

Yep!

[Anonymous]

Apparently the Blake bot has been reset and has returned to the time that the Complaint was filed, ignoring all the contradictory evidence that has come out since. Desperate times in that camp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the Blake bot has been reset and has returned to the time that the Complaint was filed, ignoring all the contradictory evidence that has come out since. Desperate times in that camp.

Waiting to see how the trial plays out, not paying attention to the paid shills stumping for this clown.

[Anonymous]

So does anyone think Jones v Abel has a better chance of settling? This case is a bit less emotionally charged, and both parties still have claims against the other, plus the discovery in this case is impacting Wayfarer in other suits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Blake is a narcissist and everything, but I wonder if there's a very very very small part of her brain -- maybe 0.1% -- that questions whether she was sexually harassed and realizes Justin is innocent.

Do you ever wonder if there is a small part of Justin's brain that questions whether he made any mistakes here? I certainly hope so. He ruined his entire career -- and I mean ruined -- with a series of weird, inappropriate, and frankly stupid behaviors. Was it SH? I don't know, I'm not a legal expert. Do I think walking in on an actress while she's topless and refusing to leave or at least face away is totally inappropriate behavior? YES. Telling your co-star (as her director) that you want to add a scene where your character (an abuser) climaxes simultaneously with her character, because that's what you and your wife do? Calling multiple actresses on set "sexy" or "hot"? Trying to convince an actress to do a birth scene with unscripted nudity by claiming "it's not normal" for women to give birth in hospital gowns? Asking a pair of actors if they "practiced" for their sex scene because it was so "hot"?

Do you think Baldoni ever looks at these incidents written out in Lively's filings and thinks, "huh, I can see now how that might be considered offensive or uncomfortable for the person on the receiving end of these behaviors." Ever?

Nah, 'cause Baldoni is innocent.

Cuz he's hot and she's not? That's about as deep as the bot brains go.

I thought she was supposed to be the hot one and he's the secret incel uggo?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Blake is a narcissist and everything, but I wonder if there's a very very very small part of her brain -- maybe 0.1% -- that questions whether she was sexually harassed and realizes Justin is innocent.

Do you ever wonder if there is a small part of Justin's brain that questions whether he made any mistakes here? I certainly hope so. He ruined his entire career -- and I mean ruined -- with a series of weird, inappropriate, and frankly stupid behaviors. Was it SH? I don't know, I'm not a legal expert. Do I think walking in on an actress while she's topless and refusing to leave or at least face away is totally inappropriate behavior? YES. Telling your co-star (as her director) that you want to add a scene where your character (an abuser) climaxes simultaneously with her character, because that's what you and your wife do? Calling multiple actresses on set "sexy" or "hot"? Trying to convince an actress to do a birth scene with unscripted nudity by claiming "it's not normal" for women to give birth in hospital gowns? Asking a pair of actors if they "practiced" for their sex scene because it was so "hot"?

Do you think Baldoni ever looks at these incidents written out in Lively's filings and thinks, "huh, I can see now how that might be considered offensive or uncomfortable for the person on the receiving end of these behaviors." Ever?

Nah, 'cause Baldoni is innocent.

Cuz he's hot and she's not? That's about as deep as the bot brains go.

I thought she was supposed to be the hot one and he's the secret incel uggo?

I don't recall anyone posting that.

[Anonymous]

To the post above, it’s fair to say Justin and Jamey made a lot of mistakes. I would likely find them annoying and I don’t dispute they were clueless and should have changed course.

But I also don’t believe they deserve this lawsuit and the article based on the evidence I have seen and I am pretty convinced no matter what Blake and Ryan were going to seek to undermine them to gain the rights to the sequel. Justin had bought the rights from Colleen and yet Colleen texted her friend “when Blake and I do the sequel.” So I do think that was the plan.

I don’t like that she was calling him a dufus and a clown before ever setting foot on set or that she was scheming with Taylor so early on. I don’t like that she refused to sigh a contract and used that as leverage to constantly bail on the movie no less than 10 times.

I also think Sony made a lot of mistakes and look really bad. They had 2 female senior producers on set every day and yet there might be SH?

And then when the movie made them 350 million - the head of the Sony Pictures called Blake epic level stupid and callously said she’d never work again.

If it was found that there was SH, Sony was on set every day and watching every daily and yet they called Blake a terrorist and accused her of creating drama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the Blake bot has been reset and has returned to the time that the Complaint was filed, ignoring all the contradictory evidence that has come out since. Desperate times in that camp.

Waiting to see how the trial plays out, not paying attention to the paid shills stumping for this clown.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To the post above, it’s fair to say Justin and Jamey made a lot of mistakes. I would likely find them annoying and I don’t dispute they were clueless and should have changed course.

But I also don’t believe they deserve this lawsuit and the article based on the evidence I have seen and I am pretty convinced no matter what Blake and Ryan were going to seek to undermine them to gain the rights to the sequel. Justin had bought the rights from Colleen and yet Colleen texted her friend “when Blake and I do the sequel.” So I do think that was the plan.

I don’t like that she was calling him a dufus and a clown before ever setting foot on set or that she was scheming with Taylor so early on. I don’t like that she refused to sigh a contract and used that as leverage to constantly bail on the movie no less than 10 times.

I also think Sony made a lot of mistakes and look really bad. They had 2 female senior producers on set every day and yet there might be SH?

And then when the movie made them 350 million - the head of the Sony Pictures called Blake epic level stupid and callously said she’d never work again.

If it was found that there was SH, Sony was on set every day and watching every daily and yet they called Blake a terrorist and accused her of creating drama.

Real question: did you read the parts of Jamey Heath's depo where he talked about who was in charge on set, and how he thought HR issues should be handled during filming?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the post above, it’s fair to say Justin and Jamey made a lot of mistakes. I would likely find them annoying and I don’t dispute they were clueless and should have changed course.

But I also don’t believe they deserve this lawsuit and the article based on the evidence I have seen and I am pretty convinced no matter what Blake and Ryan were going to seek to undermine them to gain the rights to the sequel. Justin had bought the rights from Colleen and yet Colleen texted her friend “when Blake and I do the sequel.” So I do think that was the plan.

I don’t like that she was calling him a dufus and a clown before ever setting foot on set or that she was scheming with Taylor so early on. I don’t like that she refused to sigh a contract and used that as leverage to constantly bail on the movie no less than 10 times.

I also think Sony made a lot of mistakes and look really bad. They had 2 female senior producers on set every day and yet there might be SH?

And then when the movie made them 350 million - the head of the Sony Pictures called Blake epic level stupid and callously said she’d never work again.

If it was found that there was SH, Sony was on set every day and watching every daily and yet they called Blake a terrorist and accused her of creating drama.

Real question: did you read the parts of Jamey Heath's depo where he talked about who was in charge on set, and how he thought HR issues should be handled during filming?

Why don’t you calm down and stop acting like I have a real stake in this - I really don’t care. I was simply pointing out that Sony is looking bad in all this. They certainly did not expect those texts and emails to come out, did they?

WF may have been in charge and the New York Times article made it seem like Sony was just a distributor and not really involved. We now know they were intimately involved. Having two senior producers onset every day. Being CCed on every piece of correspondence Blake’s lawyers were sending.

That’s the only point I was raising. Sony had a leak about 15 years ago that was humiliating for them. And here we are again reading the head of Sony pictures blunt emails about how he thinks Blake lively is stupid and she’ll never work again.

And how they disregarded any complaints of sexual harassment because they were obsessed with Blake‘s weight. I don’t know why she blamed Justin for that. It was the head of Sony pictures who said she looked bad and it was one of the senior producers saying don’t worry we will reshoot when she loses the baby weight.

Either Sony sucks and they’re really bad at their jobs to let it get this far and now have a huge headache of having their emails and texts out in public as well as having executives take up time to be deposed and things or they had no ideas this was coming, or probably both. No company wants that so they did open themselves up for that and I’m betting they might have some safeguards in place to avoid this kind of thing in the future, but who knows.

Conversely, they probably never thought it was going to get this far and they probably see this stuff every day on set and didn’t expect a times article and a lawsuit.

Either way they screwed themselves. I doubt, after seeing people magazine featuring head of Sony pictures calling Blake epic level stupid and having Ryan Reynolds called two of their executives “in effectual elderly people who have no idea what’s going on”….they are taking much comfort that you think it was Wayfares job or problem and not theirs - because it has became their problem.

They’re a huge company and they were caught flat footed. I’m betting heads are rolling and they’re not saying well great job everybody this was WF fault.