Yale discriminated against whites and Asians, per Justice Department

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://news.yahoo.com/dont-asians-maintain-white-privilege-213348331.html

Relevant reading

Oh yes, Yahoo says it all. They publish only lefty articles, the same way Fox publishes only those on the right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:URMs even from H or Yale typically don’t do well post-H or post-Yale. They do as well as mediocre white college grads from Podunk U.

Prove it. Based on what criteria? You haven’t even bothered to state what you mean by “do as well”. I’m guessing that you know very little about Harvard and Yale grads.

When was the last time you sought out Yale’s URM doctors to perform your life and death surgeries, their accountants to do your complicated accounting, their lawyers to defend you in the court of law? Never. Case closed.

So you ask the question then declare “cased closed”. Clearly your education — such as it was — failed.

To answer your question, although you clearly aren’t interested in the answer: All the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://news.yahoo.com/dont-asians-maintain-white-privilege-213348331.html

Relevant reading

Oh yes, Yahoo says it all. They publish only lefty articles, the same way Fox publishes only those on the right.

So you didn’t read it? Lol: You don’t even have the cojones to read it and offer a critique. I guess you’ve done your best here — such as it is.

[Anonymous]

And you have to eat two meals a day every week for 3 years from the HS cafeteria and live in a crowded apartment. Good luck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's interesting that even Harvard, which presumably could skim the cream of the crop, can't find sufficient numbers of qualified URMs to meet their racial quotas and must provide significant handicaps to blacks and latinos.

Do you have proof of this? Citation? Or is it just your racist opinion? And no, a Breitbart article (or similar) is not proof.

It’s a known fact Ivies use affirmative action for their benefit. Relatively few American born blacks benefit. Ivies use affirmative action to scoop up full-pay African or Caribbean students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://news.yahoo.com/dont-asians-maintain-white-privilege-213348331.html

Relevant reading

Oh yes, Yahoo says it all. They publish only lefty articles, the same way Fox publishes only those on the right.

So you didn’t read it? Lol: You don’t even have the cojones to read it and offer a critique. I guess you’ve done your best here — such as it is.

I saw “Yahoo” and know immediately it’s as bias as “Fox”. It’s just on the opposite political spectrum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:High test scores means the student has learned how to achieve high test scores. How valuable is that? What does that mean? Why would that translate into being a desirable match for a spot in incoming class?

High test scores = high IQ.

Nope.
( Someone with training in testing and test construction )

It can also mean that someone with reasonable rote memory skills did a lot of cramming. It COULD mean a high IQ, it would be hard to get high test scores with a very low IQ, but if you’re talking things like SAT tests, it can also reflect things like tutoring, practice, and familiarity with the materials. (There’s a reason they’re called “Prep” schools....)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:High test scores means the student has learned how to achieve high test scores. How valuable is that? What does that mean? Why would that translate into being a desirable match for a spot in incoming class?

High test scores = high IQ.

Nope.
( Someone with training in testing and test construction )

It can also mean that someone with reasonable rote memory skills did a lot of cramming. It COULD mean a high IQ, it would be hard to get high test scores with a very low IQ, but if you’re talking things like SAT tests, it can also reflect things like tutoring, practice, and familiarity with the materials. (There’s a reason they’re called “Prep” schools....)

“Someone with training in testing and test construction” = someone who gets his or her news from Yahoo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://news.yahoo.com/dont-asians-maintain-white-privilege-213348331.html

Relevant reading

Oh yes, Yahoo says it all. They publish only lefty articles, the same way Fox publishes only those on the right.

So you didn’t read it? Lol: You don’t even have the cojones to read it and offer a critique. I guess you’ve done your best here — such as it is.

I saw “Yahoo” and know immediately it’s as bias as “Fox”. It’s just on the opposite political spectrum.

You are an idiot. yahoo aggregates news. I get fox articles in my yahoo page all the time. It must be comforting to bask in your own stupidity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://news.yahoo.com/dont-asians-maintain-white-privilege-213348331.html

Relevant reading

Oh yes, Yahoo says it all. They publish only lefty articles, the same way Fox publishes only those on the right.

So you didn’t read it? Lol: You don’t even have the cojones to read it and offer a critique. I guess you’ve done your best here — such as it is.

I saw “Yahoo” and know immediately it’s as bias as “Fox”. It’s just on the opposite political spectrum.

Lol: So, you didn’t read it. That makes your opinion worthless. Oh : I think you might have meant : “biased”. Why is someone incapable of reading an article to bolster their own inadequately supported opinion commenting on issues involving an educational institution that you almost surely did not attend? Are you getting paid for this? Did you crawl over from the Political Discussion threads? SMH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://news.yahoo.com/dont-asians-maintain-white-privilege-213348331.html

Relevant reading

Oh yes, Yahoo says it all. They publish only lefty articles, the same way Fox publishes only those on the right.

So you didn’t read it? Lol: You don’t even have the cojones to read it and offer a critique. I guess you’ve done your best here — such as it is.

I saw “Yahoo” and know immediately it’s as bias as “Fox”. It’s just on the opposite political spectrum.

Lol: So, you didn’t read it. That makes your opinion worthless. Oh : I think you might have meant : “biased”. Why is someone incapable of reading an article to bolster their own inadequately supported opinion commenting on issues involving an educational institution that you almost surely did not attend? Are you getting paid for this? Did you crawl over from the Political Discussion threads? SMH

Could it be Russian bots can’t read English?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you recommending a pure meritocratic approach, what exactly does that mean? Test scores are not exactly meritocratic with the amount of tutoring and coaching that goes on

Just do what UK, Germany, France, South Korea, Japan, Singapore and many other advanced countries do. None of them discriminate against applicants based on race like us.

Not sure about all those countries but my German friend claims that higher education in germany is publically funded so to compare that to Harvard or Yale is apples and oranges. Compare germany to our publically funded options if you must

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:High test scores means the student has learned how to achieve high test scores. How valuable is that? What does that mean? Why would that translate into being a desirable match for a spot in incoming class?

High test scores = high IQ.

Nope.
( Someone with training in testing and test construction )

It can also mean that someone with reasonable rote memory skills did a lot of cramming. It COULD mean a high IQ, it would be hard to get high test scores with a very low IQ, but if you’re talking things like SAT tests, it can also reflect things like tutoring, practice, and familiarity with the materials. (There’s a reason they’re called “Prep” schools....)

“Someone with training in testing and test construction” = someone who gets his or her news from Yahoo.

Lol: A telling comment from someone who apparently can neither read nor argue.
Hint: Try reading the article and evaluating its merits for yourself. If you can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's interesting that even Harvard, which presumably could skim the cream of the crop, can't find sufficient numbers of qualified URMs to meet their racial quotas and must provide significant handicaps to blacks and latinos.

Do you have proof of this? Citation? Or is it just your racist opinion? And no, a Breitbart article (or similar) is not proof.

It’s a known fact Ivies use affirmative action for their benefit. Relatively few American born blacks benefit. Ivies use affirmative action to scoop up full-pay African or Caribbean students.

DP: lol So: No. Really, making things up without citations really doesn’t bolster your argument or your credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's interesting that even Harvard, which presumably could skim the cream of the crop, can't find sufficient numbers of qualified URMs to meet their racial quotas and must provide significant handicaps to blacks and latinos.

Do you have proof of this? Citation? Or is it just your racist opinion? And no, a Breitbart article (or similar) is not proof.

It’s a known fact Ivies use affirmative action for their benefit. Relatively few American born blacks benefit. Ivies use affirmative action to scoop up full-pay African or Caribbean students.

DP: lol So: No. Really, making things up without citations really doesn’t bolster your argument or your credibility.

But it’s a known fact. Doesn’t that mean it must be true? If we can’t trust known facts what can we trust?