X infinity |
| OP, are you Indian? |
Now you guys are just inventing things... |
Such a baby and so entitled. I don’t care what your father in law charges you, you are still spending someone ELSE’S money with your old a$$. |
| I get that he is cheap, but you are oddly cheap too. You are being subsidized. Own that. Is that why you are cheap about subsidizing others? |
It seems like he is fine subsidizing his immediate blood relatives and/or people who need the money, not already wealthy ILs. |
I was also thinking the same, that OP is Indian. |
|
I can understand not wanting to pay in laws for wife’s loans. That is one thing but I don’t get the part where if you pay for your own family, OP thinks he is subsidizing the in laws. If they made OP pay for them, that is one thing but they want to split the bill.
DH is a surgeon and we know many physicians with various income and debt. I actually kind of feel sorry for the ones whose wives come from money and in laws dictate a lot in their family as they are the ones paying. |
Nobody is subsidizing anyone if you pay for your own expenses! You subsidize someone if you pay for someone ELSE's expenses. It doesn't matter if that someone else is wealthy or not, it makes no difference. In fact the OP is demanding that the in-laws subsidize HIM and absurdly feels entitled to it. Maybe his expenses have always been paid, like for a child, and he has never realized he's now a married adult? Imagine this guy ends up having kids! Who'll be paying for their expenses? Grandparents? Government? |
I mean the informal college "loan" that the ILs are now asking son-in-law to pay back is pretty weird. Maybe they aren't as rich as they let on and couldn't afford college after all? |
They are not asking their son-in-law to pay back, they're asking their daughter and presumably they had some kind of agreement. Women are nowadays responsible for their own finances. Whatever you have before marriage (assets, loans) are your responsibility. Even in community property states, debt incurred before marriage remains separate. So it's not for the OP to decide! Even informal loans are legally binding if there's evidence of payment, text messages or such. |
You and your wife are paying for your elderly relatives and managing their affairs plus paying for your nieces and nephews big ticket items? You must have a $hit-ton of time and money on your hands. And that’s not paying it forward. That’s paying it backwards and sideways and out the door. You are the unconventional one. Not the family that gives loans not big cash or who splits meals out. |
| My parents gave us “loans” for our first car instead of gifting the whole thing. Makes you plan and think what the real value is to you. Giving people $10k-$200k of gifts doesn’t have that thought process in either party. |
Op sounds like a troll. If not they’re from some emerging market culture where there are no real capital markets or legal docs with recourse so Family Money gets pressured to fund every cousin’s and auntie’s house, wedding, education, etc. Fun times. Thank goodness they live in America where the roads are paved with gold. |
Agree It's a long thread. Based on what OP wrote in original post and subsequent comments: OP is white OP doesn't give money to anyone in his family OP doesn't want to vacation or eat out with in-laws. Wife does. OP can afford these unwanted vacations because OP'S parents paid for their education, including med school, and bought OP a house. Wealthy in-laws expect wife to pay back her tuition that FIL paid out of pocket. OP refuses to pay that loan out of marital funds. |