How can we combat deep misogyny?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's as if people posting have never been outside the US. You have no idea how good you've got it. The ignorance is just astounding.

You're right. We should be ashamed of ourselves trying to make things better for all Americans.

You don't care about all Americans. You care about yourself, so stop pretending.

I've only posted once before in this thread so I don't know where you're getting that I don't care about all Americans. Why would you assume that?

They just throw random crap out to see what sticks. Don't hesitate to call them out on their BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's as if people posting have never been outside the US. You have no idea how good you've got it. The ignorance is just astounding.

You're right. We should be ashamed of ourselves trying to make things better for all Americans.

You don't care about all Americans. You care about yourself, so stop pretending.

+1 I'm sure the pp supports misandrist policies like gender preferences.

More poo flinging...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's as if people posting have never been outside the US. You have no idea how good you've got it. The ignorance is just astounding.

You're right. We should be ashamed of ourselves trying to make things better for all Americans.

You don't care about all Americans. You care about yourself, so stop pretending.

I've only posted once before in this thread so I don't know where you're getting that I don't care about all Americans. Why would you assume that?

They just throw random crap out to see what sticks. Don't hesitate to call them out on their BS.

It all sticks, because everyone see right through you and you're very predictable.

[Anonymous]

No doubt that the women complaining about misogyny are all centerfolds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No doubt that the women complaining about misogyny are all centerfolds.

Are centerfolds? Or have?

[Anonymous]

One way to combat is to ensure our children understand that misogyny doesn’t always look like the stereotypical male buffoon.

Far worse, in my opinion, is the type of misogyny that’s shown when women are shunned for daring to voice concerns about transgender women competing in the same category as biological women for elite sports competitions, particularly in the sport of swimming and running. In my view, it’s yet another attempt at male domination, but far worse is that the push for it is coming from the left in a misguided effort to be trans-positive. One can absolutely support transgender people without crushing biological females along the way.

Notice that there isn’t a big uproar about transgender male athletes competing in the men’s category. That’s because no one cares - transgender men do not pose a threat to their final results/standings. If there were such a threat, this topic would never even be up for debate.

[Anonymous]

Where is the deep misogyny? Point me to the concrete examples. You can't, because there aren't any. In fact, women in this country are succeeding at rates never before seen in the world. At the primary, secondary, college, and graduate levels, there are more women than men, especially in demanding fields. Wage gap is a myth--it's due to differences in career choice and child-bearing choices. I know why you posted this--because you think Harris losing is an example. She lost because she was horrible. If you want to blame someone, blame the media and the Democratic Party--which is a joke. The places where women are attacked, on the athletic fields and in Gaza, are for "some reason" ignored.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One way to combat is to ensure our children understand that misogyny doesn’t always look like the stereotypical male buffoon.

Far worse, in my opinion, is the type of misogyny that’s shown when women are shunned for daring to voice concerns about transgender women competing in the same category as biological women for elite sports competitions, particularly in the sport of swimming and running. In my view, it’s yet another attempt at male domination, but far worse is that the push for it is coming from the left in a misguided effort to be trans-positive. One can absolutely support transgender people without crushing biological females along the way.

Notice that there isn’t a big uproar about transgender male athletes competing in the men’s category. That’s because no one cares - transgender men do not pose a threat to their final results/standings. If there were such a threat, this topic would never even be up for debate.

This is the one issue that made me a lifelong Democrat vote for Trump. Title IX gave women such help with so much and I hate to see its intent being change to favor men over women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where is the deep misogyny? Point me to the concrete examples. You can't, because there aren't any. In fact, women in this country are succeeding at rates never before seen in the world. At the primary, secondary, college, and graduate levels, there are more women than men, especially in demanding fields. Wage gap is a myth--it's due to differences in career choice and child-bearing choices. I know why you posted this--because you think Harris losing is an example. She lost because she was horrible. If you want to blame someone, blame the media and the Democratic Party--which is a joke. The places where women are attacked, on the athletic fields and in Gaza, are for "some reason" ignored.

+IX

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's as if people posting have never been outside the US. You have no idea how good you've got it. The ignorance is just astounding.

Oh I'm well aware that misogyny is even worse elsewhere. The fact that it's less overt here doesn't detract from its universality,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One very easy step would be to stop shaming stay at home moms in your community and online. They are women, they are contributors and right now they are given more respect by scum like Vance than Dems, who are afraid to acknowledge them for fear of feminist wrath.

don't kid yourself, he maybe gives them "more respect" than other women but that's still way less respect than he gives any man

Very stupid blanket statement.

[Anonymous]

What is the difference between misogyny and deep misogyny?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's as if people posting have never been outside the US. You have no idea how good you've got it. The ignorance is just astounding.

You're right. We should be ashamed of ourselves trying to make things better for all Americans.

You don't care about all Americans. You care about yourself, so stop pretending.

+1 I'm sure the pp supports misandrist policies like gender preferences.

Can you explain that more? What gender preferences would be misandrist?

Is this a serious question? Giving preference to a woman.

It was a serious question; gender preference can mean several things, and your arguments so far having been totally coherent so I wanted to make sure I understood what you were getting at.

I don't think many of the people here (including myself) are arguing for giving preference to women. We are saying that society judges and penalizes women more than men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's as if people posting have never been outside the US. You have no idea how good you've got it. The ignorance is just astounding.

You're right. We should be ashamed of ourselves trying to make things better for all Americans.

You don't care about all Americans. You care about yourself, so stop pretending.

+1 I'm sure the pp supports misandrist policies like gender preferences.

Can you explain that more? What gender preferences would be misandrist?

Is this a serious question? Giving preference to a woman.

It was a serious question; gender preference can mean several things, and your arguments so far having been totally coherent so I wanted to make sure I understood what you were getting at.

I don't think many of the people here (including myself) are arguing for giving preference to women. We are saying that society judges and penalizes women more than men.

*haven't

Now I'm typing too fast too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's as if people posting have never been outside the US. You have no idea how good you've got it. The ignorance is just astounding.

You're right. We should be ashamed of ourselves trying to make things better for all Americans.

You don't care about all Americans. You care about yourself, so stop pretending.

+1 I'm sure the pp supports misandrist policies like gender preferences.

Can you explain that more? What gender preferences would be misandrist?

Is this a serious question? Giving preference to a woman.

It was a serious question; gender preference can mean several things, and your arguments so far having been totally coherent so I wanted to make sure I understood what you were getting at.

I don't think many of the people here (including myself) are arguing for giving preference to women. We are saying that society judges and penalizes women more than men.

No women get substantially lower sentences for committing the same crimes as men.