The old test was gameable. My kid noted that many kids (at TPMS magnet back in the day) had A++ binders and were in test prep classes designed for the magnet admissions test. Other kids went to Dr. Li. It kind of freaked mine out because we are downcounty where the prep culture is not as strong. |
Yep. We are homeschoolers, and the list of accepted tests was mind- boggling and expensive and not easily accessible. We went with our cheapest option, but maybe that was a bad decision on my part. I even tried to email and ask a specific clarifying question, and the person who replied had no clue. Their bizarre list of acceptable options included IQ, aptitude, and achievement tests, which indicates that the person making the list didn’t understand that they were creating an apples to oranges situation. The tests measure different parameters. Maybe my kid would have had a better shot with a MAP a score. |
Nope. I noted that the program is majority Asian, actually. This is based on the complaints here that parents make, then they only focus on scores. Also, based on years of experience in the magnets. |
a good test + recs + map + grades is better than what we have now. will actually get a diverse group in just because of the process. |
Very interesting! This makes sense. For months I thought my child was at a disadvantage because they aren’t in math team or robotics but maybe the selection committee saw a kid with a strong interest in STEM but some diverse interests, particularly in the arts. What I thought was a weakness might have been a strength. |
years of experience doesn't cure prejudice |
Better for whom? Your rejected self-proclaimed genius? And no, adding another gameable test will not ensure a 'diverse group', it will only bring about another batch of prepped tortured children. |
Stop with the dog whistle. These are race blind, and I am trying to help parents who seem to think that their is a certain recipe for admission. Observations are not prejudice. Your petty remark may feed your distorted narrative, but it helps no one. The prejudice is from the parents who insist their metrics are the most important. |
prepped, tortured vs holistic, free... |
it is ok. everyone can become a better person. |
This! +1 |
PP, I'm the person who wrote the above. Don't regret helping your child have the magnet middle school experience. It's awesome for them, and I am certain that the skills they gained there will put them in a great position to start high school anywhere. And will be useful skills beyond that. It is a sacrifice, indeed, to do all that commuting, so now that you've BTDT, that's one of the bright sides of them not going to the hs magnet. You may need to spend time advocating for their needs to be addressed at your HS--improving HS options for gifted kids is not likely to happen overnight though or without a lot of community advocacy. (keep this link in mind, the MCCPTA Gifted Education committee--and no I am not on the committee but I appreciate their stuff... https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nau5KEDGiM2jKbheaVq0MivzS2M2lv9qZUDOTBytN1Q/preview ) |
The ironic part is that I'm old enough to remember when people on this very board insisted that universal screening and some regard for peer cohort was going to destroy the middle school magnets, and that the universally screened kids would have no chance of getting into one of the high school programs. This year's eighth graders were part of that experiment, and at both Takoma Park and Eastern, they seem to have done very well. |
this batch was the last one that got into through application/test |
Yes, but they also had universal screening and the peer cohort was considered. People lost their minds over those relatively subtle changes and filed a whole lawsuit over them. That lawsuit pushed MCPS to adopt the lottery. |