Cheh's Ward 3 ANC Gerrymandering

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Cheh and Silverman are such class acts, with their personal attacks on the chair and other councilmembers. Cheh can’t let the door hit her fast enough on the way out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Cheh and Silverman are such class acts, with their personal attacks on the chair and other councilmembers. Cheh can’t let the door hit her fast enough on the way out.

They called out his duplicity. How is that a personal attack? He was being duplicitous.

Y'all are snowflakes if you think that was a personal attack. How about next time, don't try an obvious end-run on a valid process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, Mendo and Goulet.

This,

Shameful that Goulet would sign on to this garbage.

He really showed his colors in enthusiastically embracing an effort that would have diluted the voices of virtually everyone else in Ward 3 in order to placate a couple of hundred NIMBYs in Cleveland Park.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, Mendo and Goulet.

This,

Shameful that Goulet would sign on to this garbage.

He really showed his colors in enthusiastically embracing an effort that would have diluted the voices of virtually everyone else in Ward 3 in order to placate a couple of hundred NIMBYs in Cleveland Park.

Explain how keeping a neighborhood together dilutes virtually everyone else in Ward 3?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Cheh and Silverman are such class acts, with their personal attacks on the chair and other councilmembers. Cheh can’t let the door hit her fast enough on the way out.

They called out his duplicity. How is that a personal attack? He was being duplicitous.

Y'all are snowflakes if you think that was a personal attack. How about next time, don't try an obvious end-run on a valid process.

Isn’t appointing three people from the same vested interest group and empowering them to pursue their own agenda an end-run on what is supposed to be a valid process. How about voting on maps thst had not been shared with other members of the task force and the public until an hour before the vote.

This is Cheh’s shame and legacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Isn’t appointing three people from the same vested interest group and empowering them to pursue their own agenda an end-run on what is supposed to be a valid process.

I assume this is about the Woodley Park resident, the Cleveland Park resident, and the McLean Gardens resident (who actually doesn't have any known connections to Cleveland Park Smart Growth) who applied and were accepted on to the Task Force.

It's unclear why the CPHS folks did not avail themselves of the opportunity to apply, nor why Mendelson is now carrying their water when he could have appointed CPHS members to the Task Force, including Nancy Macwood, over Cheh's objections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Yesterday: This isn’t about politics and ideology, this is about the law and ensuring equal representation of SMDs.

Today: Haha! Suck it Boomer NIMBYs!

LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, Mendo and Goulet.

This,

Shameful that Goulet would sign on to this garbage.

He really showed his colors in enthusiastically embracing an effort that would have diluted the voices of virtually everyone else in Ward 3 in order to placate a couple of hundred NIMBYs in Cleveland Park.

Explain how keeping a neighborhood together dilutes virtually everyone else in Ward 3?

ANC3D was absolutely massive - 11 freaking SMDs - on Mendelsohn's map. ANC3B was also ridiculously large.

ANCs - not SMDs - are afforded equal 'great weight' in the eyes of city agencies. The proposal really screwed over ANC3D and ANC3B.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Yesterday: This isn’t about politics and ideology, this is about the law and ensuring equal representation of SMDs.

Today: Haha! Suck it Boomer NIMBYs!

LOL.

You know that Task Force redistricting Tsar Bob Ward mocks them, posting as “Cleveland Park Boomer” among his various Twitter handles and personas?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Isn’t appointing three people from the same vested interest group and empowering them to pursue their own agenda an end-run on what is supposed to be a valid process.

I assume this is about the Woodley Park resident, the Cleveland Park resident, and the McLean Gardens resident (who actually doesn't have any known connections to Cleveland Park Smart Growth) who applied and were accepted on to the Task Force.

It's unclear why the CPHS folks did not avail themselves of the opportunity to apply, nor why Mendelson is now carrying their water when he could have appointed CPHS members to the Task Force, including Nancy Macwood, over Cheh's objections.

Many others volunteered to to serve on the task force, including two respected former ANC commissioners, but Cheh and her CoS, Jonathan Willingham, appointed only people for ANC 3C who were pushed by CCCP Smart Growth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Yesterday: This isn’t about politics and ideology, this is about the law and ensuring equal representation of SMDs.

Today: Haha! Suck it Boomer NIMBYs!

LOL.

You know that Task Force redistricting Tsar Bob Ward mocks them, posting as “Cleveland Park Boomer” among his various Twitter handles and personas?

You have no proof that it is Ward. Stop making stuff up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Yesterday: This isn’t about politics and ideology, this is about the law and ensuring equal representation of SMDs.

Today: Haha! Suck it Boomer NIMBYs!

LOL.

You know that Task Force redistricting Tsar Bob Ward mocks them, posting as “Cleveland Park Boomer” among his various Twitter handles and personas?

You have no proof that it is Ward. Stop making stuff up.

Oh, it’s Ward alright. One of his many social media outlets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, Mendo and Goulet.

This,

Shameful that Goulet would sign on to this garbage.

He really showed his colors in enthusiastically embracing an effort that would have diluted the voices of virtually everyone else in Ward 3 in order to placate a couple of hundred NIMBYs in Cleveland Park.

Explain how keeping a neighborhood together dilutes virtually everyone else in Ward 3?

ANC3D was absolutely massive - 11 freaking SMDs - on Mendelsohn's map. ANC3B was also ridiculously large.

ANCs - not SMDs - are afforded equal 'great weight' in the eyes of city agencies. The proposal really screwed over ANC3D and ANC3B.

This, exactly. It's basic math.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Yesterday: This isn’t about politics and ideology, this is about the law and ensuring equal representation of SMDs.

Today: Haha! Suck it Boomer NIMBYs!

LOL.

You know that Task Force redistricting Tsar Bob Ward mocks them, posting as “Cleveland Park Boomer” among his various Twitter handles and personas?

You have no proof that it is Ward. Stop making stuff up.

Oh, it’s Ward alright. One of his many social media outlets.

Munching popcorn until Jeff's IP records are subponead for the libel suit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Cheh/Silverman Amendment passes 10-3.

It is the sunset of the Cleveland Park NIMBY era.

Yesterday: This isn’t about politics and ideology, this is about the law and ensuring equal representation of SMDs.

Today: Haha! Suck it Boomer NIMBYs!

LOL.

You know that Task Force redistricting Tsar Bob Ward mocks them, posting as “Cleveland Park Boomer” among his various Twitter handles and personas?

You have no proof that it is Ward. Stop making stuff up.

Oh, it’s Ward alright. One of his many social media outlets.

Munching popcorn until Jeff's IP records are subponead for the libel suit.

With the Redistricting Tsar’s various ties, it’s rather doubtful that that he would want to get within 100 miles of civil discovery. And the sock puppetry between CP Smart Growth, CP Boomer, etc. is weird but juvenile.