Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This dude is a chronically online type. He is no normal democrat or republican. I would almost be inclined to calm him an accelerationist (not sure if that’s the right term) more than anything else.

This. He was part of a discord group and did the deed for them. I think this investigation will get bigger.

Some odd new age terror cell? I thought those chats were monitored?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Man. All this damn fighting from grown adults is ridiculous. Can we all agree a mentally disturbed young man, regardless of politics, committed murder and should be punished. Whether you liked Charlie Kirk or not, hopefully we can agree that he didn’t deserve to murdered in broad daylight, especially in front of his wife and two young children. That’s it. Who cares about politics. This is right and wrong. There have been Democrat, Republican, and mentally ill shooters in these past event years. All messed up and wrong, regardless of their motive. He was a father na husband who didn’t deserve to be murdered.

Guns and 2A are the common denominator.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has been itching to use this as an excuse to wreak vengeance on Dems. What’s he going to do now that the narrative isn’t so convenient?

They’re inventing a new narrative.

They don’t need to. What Robison wrote on the bullets is enough.

The fact that you still believe this shows how desperate you are for this story to fit your narrative. Things are different this time. The shooter is alive. His story and beliefs will come out in court. You won't have a change to invent his narrative this time.

Wait you think that the Trump admin is going to follow protocol? lol.

It isn’t about my narrative. You get what I’m saying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Antifa did J6 then trump pardoned them then antifa shot Charlie Kirk ergo trump is antifa and killed Charlie Kirk.

I like this one.

This is a good angle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is problem with young men. Not politics. Young men are feeling moved to assassinate and shoot up schools when they take grievances about something or someone. Maybe for attention, send a message, need world wide validation? Social media and sensationalism is part to blame. It isn’t any individuals politics though.

OR hear me out...this is a problem with access to GUNS

Gun access has been constant throughout history. These brazen public murders to send messages haven’t been

That is completely not true. What?

Exactly! First of all, the Supreme Court interpreted the second amendment MUCH more narrowly for most of its history.

Plus, automatic weapons and the internet used to not exist.

But political assassinations did (see how WW1started!)

[Anonymous]

Wait I thought Netanyahu said islamists were responsible for Charlie Kirk's assassination. Why would he lie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He was very obviously republican and took issue with Kirk. Kirk did say some pretty inflammatory things.
The Republican Party is splitting because maga is truly separate. And even within maga party there are divisions.

This is cope.

They aren’t splitting.

They are bonding stronger after the left wings mockery of Kirk’s death.

[Anonymous]

We can argue motive all day long, but one think clear as day is that this is white on white violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This dude is a chronically online type. He is no normal democrat or republican. I would almost be inclined to calm him an accelerationist (not sure if that’s the right term) more than anything else.

Yet again.

Self radicalization online, grab a gun, be a wannabe hero.

+1 there are some dark effed up corners of the internet. Keep an eye on your kids.

Yes and Charlie Kirk was one of them. Look at how he has radicalized these maga posters.

And there it is. Equating Kirk to his own assassin. It took a while on this thread but I knew it was coming. In your opinion if you are to the left of Mao you are radicalized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This dude is a chronically online type. He is no normal democrat or republican. I would almost be inclined to calm him an accelerationist (not sure if that’s the right term) more than anything else.

This. He was part of a discord group and did the deed for them. I think this investigation will get bigger.

Some odd new age terror cell? I thought those chats were monitored?

By the FBI that got DOGED? Probably not anymore. They do not have the staff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Man. All this damn fighting from grown adults is ridiculous. Can we all agree a mentally disturbed young man, regardless of politics, committed murder and should be punished. Whether you liked Charlie Kirk or not, hopefully we can agree that he didn’t deserve to murdered in broad daylight, especially in front of his wife and two young children. That’s it. Who cares about politics. This is right and wrong. There have been Democrat, Republican, and mentally ill shooters in these past event years. All messed up and wrong, regardless of their motive. He was a father na husband who didn’t deserve to be murdered.

This.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was very obviously republican and took issue with Kirk. Kirk did say some pretty inflammatory things.
The Republican Party is splitting because maga is truly separate. And even within maga party there are divisions.

This is cope.

They aren’t splitting.

They are bonding stronger after the left wings mockery of Kirk’s death.

Sure they are. The air kind of went out of the balloon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is problem with young men. Not politics. Young men are feeling moved to assassinate and shoot up schools when they take grievances about something or someone. Maybe for attention, send a message, need world wide validation? Social media and sensationalism is part to blame. It isn’t any individuals politics though.

Young men and mental health turn out to be a problem every time a right-winger commits a crime. In any other case, the problem turns out to be immigration, left ideology or other convenient political target.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man. All this damn fighting from grown adults is ridiculous. Can we all agree a mentally disturbed young man, regardless of politics, committed murder and should be punished. Whether you liked Charlie Kirk or not, hopefully we can agree that he didn’t deserve to murdered in broad daylight, especially in front of his wife and two young children. That’s it. Who cares about politics. This is right and wrong. There have been Democrat, Republican, and mentally ill shooters in these past event years. All messed up and wrong, regardless of their motive. He was a father na husband who didn’t deserve to be murdered.

Guns and 2A are the common denominator.

No, being online is. Young men spending too much time online that maybe are prone to mental instability or have some underlying problem are always the ones doing this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This dude is a chronically online type. He is no normal democrat or republican. I would almost be inclined to calm him an accelerationist (not sure if that’s the right term) more than anything else.

This. He was part of a discord group and did the deed for them. I think this investigation will get bigger.

Some odd new age terror cell? I thought those chats were monitored?

Hahahaha

What would make you think that?