Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at the posters who speak so much about female abuse victims, instead of abuse victims without identifying gender. Have you not read about the male victims at the hands of female abusers? Abuse is wrong, full stop.

I can't wrap my head around anything other than that the verdict in any trial should be based on the evidence and testimony, not the gender of either party.

[phone]
THANK YOU!

Can you imagine if the evidence was reversed, ie. if JD was recorded saying "I didn't punch you, I was hitting you, you're such a baby"??

Then carry on to say "nobody will believe you".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone remember Sasha Mitchell and the false allegations from his wife that derailed his career?? I do.

AH did not derail JD’s career - he did that himself. Disney already testified to that.

He did not need to bring this case but coukd have written a counter op Ed with his version of reality. In stead he has dragged himself and AH through the mud in public bringing further pain to himself and families on both sides.

JD has consumed so much drugs and alcohol that it is not possible for him to remember how he behaved when under the influence. He was twice her age when they started dating and yet takes zero responsibility for the toxic relationship.

The level of misogyny on the internet in vilifying AH and casting her as the only reprehensible party makes me afraid for my teenage daughter. For example, the poop in bed episode was misrepresented to be her depraved way of communicating displeasure when it was her incontinent dog.

They are both talented but damaged individuals who hurt each other. I hope they both lose their cases and that both move on with more dignity and respect.

Amber Heard makes me fear for my daughter. Making false claims of abuse sets woman back. I think she belong in jail


Furthermore I have a teacup yorkie. I have bridge to sell you if you think that poop came out of a freaking teacup yorkie. My dogs shit can be picked up with a toothpick

I agree 100%!! People on this forum have not watched and heard the witnesses and evidence. I predict in the future we'll hear more destruction from Amber Heard. I fear very much for her daughter!! She uses children as props for paparazzi. Whitney was beat up by Amber. Whitney feared Amber would kill Johnny.

Whitney is very afraid of Amber. She is the only nonexpert witness willing to come to court on Amber's behalf and her stair story was different from Amber's. Whitney's former boss' testimony contradicts Whitney's. Amber and Whitney lie. You believers will eventually see the truth.

Abuse victims tend to become isolated from their social support networks. That JD had lots of people testifying for him and AH had so few tends to suggest the opposite of what you think it does. Unfortunately your misconception is a prevalent one, so the jury may operate under a similar misapprehension on that point.

I completely understand the isolation of some abuse victims. Amber was not isolated and not a victim. The jury is well aware.

You know he’ll never want to f#ck you, right? Barry legal Russian hookers are more his style these days. He thinks people like you are parasites.

See what I mean? Dismissing anyone that doesn't blindly believe in AH's lies as wanting to f**k JD. Lol. Sorry to break it to you but, unlike YOU, we choose to look at the evidence instead of condemning a person just because he has a penis.

You keep accusing people of sexism without evidence. It’s very transparent.

Your view on women is very transparent as you keep on dismissing people who question AH's claims as dimwits who want in on some action with JD.

Go find a single post where people said only women can be abuse victims. You are the one who dropped in here to throw out this accusation multiple times without any foundation to try to discredit anyone who go disagrees with you.

If you can’t support your accusations, I’ll just go ahead and report them as derailing.

Not sure who you're responding to, but my comment that you are responding to was to someone earlier that said "You know he’ll never want to f#ck you, right? Barry legal Russian hookers are more his style these days. He thinks people like you are parasites"

To which you responded: “Sorry to break it to you but, unlike YOU, we choose to look at the evidence instead of condemning a person just because he has a penis.”

Then I'll report you for accusing us non-believers as wanting to f**k JD. That's pretty derailing as well, don't you agree? Go ahead and find a post where anyone of us said we don't believe in AH's claims because we want to f**k JD.

The idea that I believe something because I want to F someone is insulting, yes, and besides that I think that PPs made more substantial points. No one said "I support JD because I want to F him."

One should refrain from making accusations about others if one doesn't want accusations thrown back at them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at the posters who speak so much about female abuse victims, instead of abuse victims without identifying gender. Have you not read about the male victims at the hands of female abusers? Abuse is wrong, full stop.

I can't wrap my head around anything other than that the verdict in any trial should be based on the evidence and testimony, not the gender of either party.

I so agree. They want everyone to blindly believe what a woman claims just because she's a woman and accept everything she says as truth. They also dismissed anyone who's skeptical as misogynistic and endangering women. Well, what about men and their rights? They also deserve to be heard. Abuse can be done both ways but it seems only the one done toward women is important to them

+1 well said

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone remember Sasha Mitchell and the false allegations from his wife that derailed his career?? I do.

AH did not derail JD’s career - he did that himself. Disney already testified to that.

He did not need to bring this case but coukd have written a counter op Ed with his version of reality. In stead he has dragged himself and AH through the mud in public bringing further pain to himself and families on both sides.

JD has consumed so much drugs and alcohol that it is not possible for him to remember how he behaved when under the influence. He was twice her age when they started dating and yet takes zero responsibility for the toxic relationship.

The level of misogyny on the internet in vilifying AH and casting her as the only reprehensible party makes me afraid for my teenage daughter. For example, the poop in bed episode was misrepresented to be her depraved way of communicating displeasure when it was her incontinent dog.

They are both talented but damaged individuals who hurt each other. I hope they both lose their cases and that both move on with more dignity and respect.

Amber Heard makes me fear for my daughter. Making false claims of abuse sets woman back. I think she belong in jail


Furthermore I have a teacup yorkie. I have bridge to sell you if you think that poop came out of a freaking teacup yorkie. My dogs shit can be picked up with a toothpick

I agree 100%!! People on this forum have not watched and heard the witnesses and evidence. I predict in the future we'll hear more destruction from Amber Heard. I fear very much for her daughter!! She uses children as props for paparazzi. Whitney was beat up by Amber. Whitney feared Amber would kill Johnny.

Whitney is very afraid of Amber. She is the only nonexpert witness willing to come to court on Amber's behalf and her stair story was different from Amber's. Whitney's former boss' testimony contradicts Whitney's. Amber and Whitney lie. You believers will eventually see the truth.

Abuse victims tend to become isolated from their social support networks. That JD had lots of people testifying for him and AH had so few tends to suggest the opposite of what you think it does. Unfortunately your misconception is a prevalent one, so the jury may operate under a similar misapprehension on that point.

I completely understand the isolation of some abuse victims. Amber was not isolated and not a victim. The jury is well aware.

You know he’ll never want to f#ck you, right? Barry legal Russian hookers are more his style these days. He thinks people like you are parasites.

See what I mean? Dismissing anyone that doesn't blindly believe in AH's lies as wanting to f**k JD. Lol. Sorry to break it to you but, unlike YOU, we choose to look at the evidence instead of condemning a person just because he has a penis.

You keep accusing people of sexism without evidence. It’s very transparent.

Your view on women is very transparent as you keep on dismissing people who question AH's claims as dimwits who want in on some action with JD.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at the posters who speak so much about female abuse victims, instead of abuse victims without identifying gender. Have you not read about the male victims at the hands of female abusers? Abuse is wrong, full stop.

I can't wrap my head around anything other than that the verdict in any trial should be based on the evidence and testimony, not the gender of either party.

Please show us the posts saying only women can be victims of domestic abuse. Because it sure seems like you’re lying through your teeth here to try to distract from the evidence in the case.

Relax.

[Anonymous]

The only people that I think are being blind to this whole thing are those who claim one side or the other isn't lying about anything. I don't care whose side you believe overall, but you're an idiot if you think neither has lied about anything.

Example (and this is just a few of many):

1. AH saying that she thought pledging and donating mean the same thing so she never lied when she told organizations and the public that she had donated the money from her divorce.. LIE

2. JD claiming he would never have the hubris to say terrible things about women that he was accused of saying. When shown the emails that came from him, he claims maybe someone else wrote them from his phone. LIE (sure, maybe he didn't remember saying them, but once he saw them, he knew they were from him. Does anyone think that someone on his payroll is sending out emails like that without him having any knowledge and risking their overpaid jobs to do so?)

3. AH claiming she didn't give the video to TMZ and has no idea who did. TMZ not only put it online after 15 min. of receiving it, her readjusting of the phone were cut out of it, and TMZ said they don't post anything until it is vetted and they have the copyright to it. While I don't think this was 100% clear, if you carefully listened to TMZ the testimony was: 1. we vet it to make sure it is authentic; 2. we won't post it without the copyright; 3. once we have the copyright from the owner of the video, we can post it; 4. the owner is either another new source or someone who shot it directly; and 5. we posted it in 15 minutes. That means in 15 min. they verified it was authentic, knew from the person who shot it that she was the one to shoot it, had the copyright and authorized it to be shared, by giving her copyright up. There is NO OTHER WAY TMZ could have posted it without authorization from the person with the copyright. Had someone seen the video and just sent it to TMZ, they wouldn't have posted it. This is what they said, but the questioning didn't have the answers that linear and clear.

4. While this was more from his lawyer, it is attributed to his side: NO ONE - no one at all - thinks JD was just asleep or taking a nap in the pictures where he is passed out, esp on the floor right next to a bed.

Other than this, I don't care what side you go with...but if you think that one side hasn't lied at all, that's where I lose respect...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at the posters who speak so much about female abuse victims, instead of abuse victims without identifying gender. Have you not read about the male victims at the hands of female abusers? Abuse is wrong, full stop.

I can't wrap my head around anything other than that the verdict in any trial should be based on the evidence and testimony, not the gender of either party.

Please show us the posts saying only women can be victims of domestic abuse. Because it sure seems like you’re lying through your teeth here to try to distract from the evidence in the case.

Relax.

So at least you acknowledge you were lying.

JD fans are deranged. Frankly, anyone so personally invested in people they don’t know and who don’t care about them that they are hurling profanity at anonymous people on the internet is deranged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at the posters who speak so much about female abuse victims, instead of abuse victims without identifying gender. Have you not read about the male victims at the hands of female abusers? Abuse is wrong, full stop.

I can't wrap my head around anything other than that the verdict in any trial should be based on the evidence and testimony, not the gender of either party.

Please show us the posts saying only women can be victims of domestic abuse. Because it sure seems like you’re lying through your teeth here to try to distract from the evidence in the case.

Relax.

So at least you acknowledge you were lying.

JD fans are deranged. Frankly, anyone so personally invested in people they don’t know and who don’t care about them that they are hurling profanity at anonymous people on the internet is deranged.

And AH fans are as deranged for accusing strangers who don't agree with them of wanting to get into JD's pants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at the posters who speak so much about female abuse victims, instead of abuse victims without identifying gender. Have you not read about the male victims at the hands of female abusers? Abuse is wrong, full stop.

I can't wrap my head around anything other than that the verdict in any trial should be based on the evidence and testimony, not the gender of either party.

Please show us the posts saying only women can be victims of domestic abuse. Because it sure seems like you’re lying through your teeth here to try to distract from the evidence in the case.

Relax.

So at least you acknowledge you were lying.

JD fans are deranged. Frankly, anyone so personally invested in people they don’t know and who don’t care about them that they are hurling profanity at anonymous people on the internet is deranged.

You're only proving the points you try to dismiss. It's called hypocrisy, hun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at the posters who speak so much about female abuse victims, instead of abuse victims without identifying gender. Have you not read about the male victims at the hands of female abusers? Abuse is wrong, full stop.

I can't wrap my head around anything other than that the verdict in any trial should be based on the evidence and testimony, not the gender of either party.

Please show us the posts saying only women can be victims of domestic abuse. Because it sure seems like you’re lying through your teeth here to try to distract from the evidence in the case.

Relax.

So at least you acknowledge you were lying.

JD fans are deranged. Frankly, anyone so personally invested in people they don’t know and who don’t care about them that they are hurling profanity at anonymous people on the internet is deranged.

And AH fans are as deranged for accusing strangers who don't agree with them of wanting to get into JD's pants.

Perhaps if I were an AH fan that would bother me, but I’m not so I don’t.

Some of us aren’t here because we’re fangirls for either of them, we’re more interested in the legal issues.

[Anonymous]

I see JD’s PR team in high alert given the jury will begin deliberating tomorrow. So inappropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at the posters who speak so much about female abuse victims, instead of abuse victims without identifying gender. Have you not read about the male victims at the hands of female abusers? Abuse is wrong, full stop.

I can't wrap my head around anything other than that the verdict in any trial should be based on the evidence and testimony, not the gender of either party.

Please show us the posts saying only women can be victims of domestic abuse. Because it sure seems like you’re lying through your teeth here to try to distract from the evidence in the case.

Relax.

So at least you acknowledge you were lying.

JD fans are deranged. Frankly, anyone so personally invested in people they don’t know and who don’t care about them that they are hurling profanity at anonymous people on the internet is deranged.

And AH fans are as deranged for accusing strangers who don't agree with them of wanting to get into JD's pants.

Perhaps if I were an AH fan that would bother me, but I’m not so I don’t.

Some of us aren’t here because we’re fangirls for either of them, we’re more interested in the legal issues.

Eh, doesn't me bother either because I'm not a fangirl but you go ahead and keep labeling people that are skeptical about AH's claims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see JD’s PR team in high alert given the jury will begin deliberating tomorrow. So inappropriate.

Oh now we're also JD's PR team? Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see JD’s PR team in high alert given the jury will begin deliberating tomorrow. So inappropriate.

The poopster is the inappropriate one.

[Anonymous]

It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.