Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m amazed at the amount of resources being applied to this investigation
On the news this morning it was stated 400 people are searching. That’s crazy.
It’s beyond crazy. How many crimes aren’t being prevented or investigated and solved because of the resources being deployed to investigate the disappearance of an 84 year old woman who is likely died or was killed the not long after she disappeared.
It’s kind of gross really. This country has a serious case of misplaced priorities.
Have you considered that the kind of person who would kidnap an elderly person from her home is a very dangerous person who should be locked up?
No doubt but all kidnappers are dangerous and many others (namely children) are kidnapped every day and don’t get even half the attention or resource. Savannah knows who did this. The cops should take a look at her correspondence. This screams shakedown. She was probably asked for money prior to this and when the demands weren’t met, an extreme was taken. I believe based on her mannerisms and commentary in her videos she knows who did this.
All of your ASSumptions are completely gross. Leave this poor woman and her family alone.
DP
No, we should not leave them alone. The family should be the first suspect. You and the starry eyed sheriff are so in love with the family. Occam’s razor says the family did this
No…Occam’s razor says it was a stranger. For the family to be involved, there are a whole lot of circumstances that you would need to assume.
This. It’s not family or inheritance related bc family would just pretend she died in her sleep. There is no incentive to go through a kidnapping and the attention it brings if family. If it’s inheritance related, again, kidnapping makes no sense because the person is still assumed alive and there is no inheritance.
Pretend she died in her sleep how? They would need to suffocate her for that or poison her and that would show up on an autopsy. They’d get in trouble. Assuming this is about insurance policy, insurers demand autopsies when cause of death is unclear
Why do you think they would do an autopsy on a sickly 84 yr old?
Exactly. Autopsies are expensive and she had serious heart issues, limited mobility, and required medication to survive.
They’re not as expensive as paying out a policy and insurance companies will demand that or a post mortem if cause of death is unclear. She also had a pacemaker which would’ve recorded an elevated heart rate/suffocation. There’s no way she could have been killed quietly in her sleep. The kidnapping needed to happen so she was moved away from her phone (that was tracking her pacemakers /hearts activity). Her medication was not taken so we know the kidnapper did not care about keeping her alive and getting ransom. Whoever did this ensured all ducks were in a row: disabled the front door camera, no tire tracks, no dna, phone and medication still at home, no burglary, no sign of forced entry
I don’t think the pacemakers update continuously in that way. I think it updated periodically, so if she was killed after the last update and then moved out of range, it wouldn’t show.
I wish people would stop saying the thing about tire racks. The only way you get tire tracks on rock driveways is if you peel out with crazy accleratkon/turn. Nothing here is inconsistent with a burglary gone wrong. My guess is she got up suddenly hearing the person and either he hit her or she fell and broke her neck because she didn’t have her walker. No dna because the burglar had his hands and hair covered.