Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D-list actress & no one in America knew her name.. small role on a small network show.. wasn’t a celebrity until she used Serena & then Piers to meet Harry at elite London Wimbledon after parties & started dating him.. She chased him.

Stop perpetuating lies. They met through a mutual friend, some baron’s daughter who worked in PR. Apparently it took this woman a long time to get the H&M to make time to meet. Their schedule’s kept conflicting.

....and Meghan had that pesky boyfriend.

Like many women with boyfriends, it obviously wasn’t a good fit. It happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the British press is what sent her over the edge, I'd hate to see what will happen to her once they're exposed to the American, British and Canadian presses. You can only plant so many positive pieces on yourself (hello People!). Do they really think their press will be majority positive in every other country except for Britain after this? Seems so presumptuous.

North American press aren't sycophants and for the most part don't even care about celebrities (except for TMZ)

NYC and LA (most major US cities) are legendary for having large numbers of famous people who regular people just let go about their days.

The press will request interviews through the proper channels but I don't see CNN/the Chicago Tribune/New York Times writing hateful rhetoric day-in and out like the British Royal Rota did.

The British press however will have to find another focus in order to get all their money for clicks though. Good luck to the rest of the royal family back in the UK.

Do you really think the British press is incapable of stationing their people to shadow these two wherever they go?

It’ll be much more challenging for them to so. They will have to cycle people in and out.

They can hire local stringers. Very easy to do

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D-list actress & no one in America knew her name.. small role on a small network show.. wasn’t a celebrity until she used Serena & then Piers to meet Harry at elite London Wimbledon after parties & started dating him.. She chased him.

Stop perpetuating lies. They met through a mutual friend, some baron’s daughter who worked in PR. Apparently it took this woman a long time to get the H&M to make time to meet. Their schedule’s kept conflicting.

....and Meghan had that pesky boyfriend.

And Harry was dating a model when he met Meghan. By do you misogynist always try to slut shame women? Save it for your own daughters

[Anonymous]

Are there any Canadian Palaces since Canada is part of
The Commonwealth? Also I think I recall that Megan gave up US citizenship -maybe that is why they cannot love to USA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The article headlines above looking down on Meghan are just plain mean. I never saw those before. I understand, she is a poor commoner, and not royalty. But still. It's wrong.

I can't imagine the racism she dealt with there, or the snobbery. She married for love, not status. You could tell the entire time leading up to the wedding that she was camera nervous.

She seems down to earth. Too down to earth to sit on the perch of the British Empire, I guess.

But who cares? Seriously? They are living their best liife. Good for them.

Is there some type of political or larger implication of this that I am missing that impacts anyone but the royal family?

Racism? Nobody sees a black woman when they see MM. She's trying to appropriate and weaponize blackness that she does not actually possess. She didn't grow up hard knocks, either; she was a privileged private school gal from K through age 22. Then she was a layabout actress for 15 years. Now she's a layabout royal interloper. Her woe is me minority shtick falls flat. This is one of THE most privileged persons on Earth.

WTF? Were you born under a rock? Most people do see her as a black woman.

+1. I'm the biracial PP. Most white Americans have trouble recognizing African ancestry--I think this is partly why some AAs were able to "pass" into white society throughout US history.

I've had white people burst out laughing when they find out I'm black/part black. Never had that happen with black people; they always recognize that I'm at least part black.

STOP IT. Both (all?) of you.

Stop what? Acknowledging the reality of what MM and other AAs may face in 2020? Are you trying to shush VALID experiences? Did you shush the similar shade POC that doesnt like MM and said she isn't black, or that she didnt have blackness?

Look, if you want to put your head in the sand and choke that is on you. What you aren't going to do is control who can and who cannot talk about their experience and contribution becuase it offends your fragile sensibilities. There are over 1M AA people in Mississipi alone that have been told to STOP talking about things that others dont care about.

You don't have the right to tell me to stop sharing my opinion and experience. Go back to sleeping on everything.

Maybe you should ask yourself why you're so bothered by it. You can agree/disagree/not GAF, and not feel the need to regulate convo.

So start your own thread. It’s hard to real relevant posts in between all of your gibberish. Your counterpart was annoying too be he/she appears to have stopped.

Relevant to WHOM? LOL! Just because you cannot follow, doesn't mean I am off topic. Take it up with Jeff. My post is relevant to the discussion. I already explained why. What isnt relevant is you telling me to stop talking about something you don't like. And you are really doing a lot, I posted TWICE and you tried to shut me down. Sorry! It doesn't work like that!

This entire thread is about speculation and talk of race, class, money, thoughts of why, blah blah blah. But you pick on me. GTFOHWTBS

poor you the victim. You sound like Meghan.

I'm not a victim. At all. But you are coming off as a bully. Take your own advice: Stop.

Shhh. The grownups are talking.

NP. Shut up Trumpster. You’ve already shown your hood.

That’s your insult? LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
On what legal basis would they be allowed to become Canadian citizens?

I looked into moving to Canada in 2016. It’s really not that hard if you are wealthy and not super old.

Any link to requirements?
My Canadian friend says it’s not that easy at all.

It’s not easy for normal people. Much harder than getting US citizenship - my friend had to hire a lawyer, and she had a great job there and was married to a Canadian with whom she has 3 kids.

They aren’t normal people. They are quite wealthy. I don’t recall the exact amount that you needed to bring if you didn’t meet the other criteria, but it was a pittance compared to what people allege H&M spend a year. We’re normal people and immigrating to Canada ain’t happening

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the British press is what sent her over the edge, I'd hate to see what will happen to her once they're exposed to the American, British and Canadian presses. You can only plant so many positive pieces on yourself (hello People!). Do they really think their press will be majority positive in every other country except for Britain after this? Seems so presumptuous.

North American press aren't sycophants and for the most part don't even care about celebrities (except for TMZ)

NYC and LA (most major US cities) are legendary for having large numbers of famous people who regular people just let go about their days.

The press will request interviews through the proper channels but I don't see CNN/the Chicago Tribune/New York Times writing hateful rhetoric day-in and out like the British Royal Rota did.

The British press however will have to find another focus in order to get all their money for clicks though. Good luck to the rest of the royal family back in the UK.

Do you really think the British press is incapable of stationing their people to shadow these two wherever they go?

It’ll be much more challenging for them to so. They will have to cycle people in and out.

They can hire local stringers. Very easy to do

Most paparazzi are independent contractors. The British press just has to buy the pics from them. The gloves are off now. Those two threw the Royal Family, the British press and the British public under the bus. There is no love lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are there any Canadian Palaces since Canada is part of
The Commonwealth? Also I think I recall that Megan gave up US citizenship -maybe that is why they cannot love to USA.

She's still a US citizen. So is the baby.

Vancouver is an excellent location for them because 1) it's part of the Commonwealth and 2) it's a hub for the US television and movie industry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
This looks like it will end up working out in most everyone's favor except Will and Kate.

Harry and Megan will get to live in Canada, make money, retain their titles, keep connected to the royal family when they travel back and give the finger to the British press. Charles should have no problem kicking lesser royals off the duty and public payroll list now that his own son has stepped back. The Queen has a reason to delay giving the throne to Charles with all the "crisis". Will loses because he and Kate will need to pick up more of the royal duties and they have a history of trying to avoid as much work as possible. They also will end up with the brunt of the British press problems now.


Alternatively, Meghan and Harry become seen as greedy and out of touch due to their huge speaking fees and trying to build a fortune out of just being the next Karadashians rather than anything sincere and Meghan is still unhappy and the great Sussex divorce happens in about five years and Harry goes back to the UK alone.

Meanwhile Will and Kate do the actual duty and become widely and quietly respected for their pragmatism and stiff upper lip and duty to the British state. And they've got Meghan out of the picture.

The Queen is never stepping down. She doesn't do abdication. So your theory is destroyed by your lack of knowledge of the monarchy and what it actually does.


But she is under public pressure to step down from some quarters, and this gives her another excuse. Honestly, though, she's almost 94. She won't live that much longer.

Megan and Harry are extremely popular especially with progressive to moderates, under 65 crowd, multinationals etc. They'll do fine. The people that hate them like the crazy poster have always hated them. The racist older white lady demographic has never been a part of their brand.

Canada will do well too. One paper estimated that Harry and Megan brought in over 2B to England in tourism. Canada does not have anything at the level of the Sussex family and their choosing Canada will help Canadain tourism.

The pressure to step down is coming from Charles aides who have been trying to push things along and accelerate things. This will stall that for a bit. She'll step aside eventually when she becomes ill.

Where's this idea that they're extremely popular? Even with the young progressive crowd?

Woke people aren't into royalty to begin with. That's the antithesis of being progressive! Young urban progressives in the UK are anti monarchy and pro Republican so how does that square up with Meghan and Harry keeping any popularity? You think progressives are going go be thrilled by some entitled couple racking up huge speaking fees just because of their royal titles? What wonderful wisdom will they be able to give us at those expensive speeches in front of other rich people? How to save the environment while still having a private jet?

And without the royal connections, what exactly are they? Uh? Some kind of useless celebs? They're a dime a dozen.

I'm sure they'll be fine. But like all royals who move away from the orbit they'll fade away. It happened to the Windsors. They were glamorous people among jet setters but irrelevant and hardly popular.

This is from Vogue on what happened to Edward and Wallis. Perhaps the Sussexes will have better luck.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vogue.com/article/what-happened-when-king-edward-viii-quit-the-royal-family/amp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll bet they have great sex. William is probably envious.

Why? I’m sure William is getting great sex from somebody. Whether it’s his wife is another question.

Not really a question. William is banging other people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What does it mean when they say "period of transition"-does that mean a permanent move to Canada? Does that mean officially leaving royalty? Anyone understand this? Cannot believe I care. I actually do believe that if they lose titles they will eventually lose brand power just like Fergie. They need to hold those titles and get a palace in Canada-then we can call Megan "Boss lady." Harry though has lost his appeal to me because he is sooooooooooooo whipped that it is a turn off.

Think of his military mates from Afghanistan and the Invictus games. Harry is probably the last man they thought would be henpecked.

[Anonymous]

“I want to be financially independent, and..”

Become a firefighter? A shopkeeper in a small town? An interior decorator? A baker?

“No, an instagram influencer.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are there any Canadian Palaces since Canada is part of
The Commonwealth? Also I think I recall that Megan gave up US citizenship -maybe that is why they cannot love to USA.

You cannot really ever give up US citizenship for good. If you renounced it due to your new home country rules, all it takes is a visit to the nearest embassy and a statement that you changed your mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The emasculation of Prince Harry (AKA, the most whipped royal ever) continues apace.

The toxic impact of SJW Hollywood feminism on Western man cannot be understated.

So cute when the incels post on princess threads.

[Anonymous]

For those of you who say the Sussexes bring major money to Britain and will to Canada - can you explain your reasoning? What exactly is the connection to tourism? I mean I travel to London easily 4 to 6 times a year. Harry and Meghan never figure one cent in my reasoning. Why would they? I know I have zero chance of seeing them, and zero chance of them wanting to see me. I'm not buying ceramic mugs or tea towels with their likeness. How do they bring in money?