Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
they are relatively popular with progressives as progressive royals. and they would continue to be so because progressives would continually side with vs more conservative members of the royal family. but the calculus changes significantly if they are not royals. it’s nice that they are progressive and all but not all that interesting especially as they get older. who will care about them 15 years from now? they used to be royals and they were a big deal once but progressives ultimately don’t care about royalty of any sort. it was only in their role as “bad royals” that they were interesting. |
|
The emasculation of Prince Harry (AKA, the most whipped royal ever) continues apace.
The toxic impact of SJW Hollywood feminism on Western man cannot be understated. |
Her mother was 102 when she died. |
| Lady Louise Windsor is 16. She's a favorite with the Queen and would make a good spokesperson in a few years. Her brother is too young. |
Perhaps, but it’s a sentiment shared by nearly every single newspaper. I would post here but it’s hard to post multiple articles using a phone. |
He's moving out of his grandmother's house and giving up his grandmother's money.... it's sort of the opposite of emasculated. |
Hardly! - DP |
The young royals don’t start taking on engagements until after college. Will + Harry didn’t start major tours until they were near 25. Before that they did 1-2 with Charles which negates having additional HRHs if Edward or Sophie need to be there too. |
Stop perpetuating lies. They met through a mutual friend, some baron’s daughter who worked in PR. Apparently it took this woman a long time to get the H&M to make time to meet. Their schedule’s kept conflicting. |
....and Meghan had that pesky boyfriend. |
She’s a bottled blonde. That’s all that matters. |
| MM did chase Harry. |
What a great sacrifice. He’s giving up a whopping 5% of his income and will still live off the family teat. |
Where's this idea that they're extremely popular? Even with the young progressive crowd? Woke people aren't into royalty to begin with. That's the antithesis of being progressive! Young urban progressives in the UK are anti monarchy and pro Republican so how does that square up with Meghan and Harry keeping any popularity? You think progressives are going go be thrilled by some entitled couple racking up huge speaking fees just because of their royal titles? What wonderful wisdom will they be able to give us at those expensive speeches in front of other rich people? How to save the environment while still having a private jet? And without the royal connections, what exactly are they? Uh? Some kind of useless celebs? They're a dime a dozen. I'm sure they'll be fine. But like all royals who move away from the orbit they'll fade away. It happened to the Windsors. They were glamorous people among jet setters but irrelevant and hardly popular. |