Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
This looks like it will end up working out in most everyone's favor except Will and Kate.

Harry and Megan will get to live in Canada, make money, retain their titles, keep connected to the royal family when they travel back and give the finger to the British press. Charles should have no problem kicking lesser royals off the duty and public payroll list now that his own son has stepped back. The Queen has a reason to delay giving the throne to Charles with all the "crisis". Will loses because he and Kate will need to pick up more of the royal duties and they have a history of trying to avoid as much work as possible. They also will end up with the brunt of the British press problems now.


Alternatively, Meghan and Harry become seen as greedy and out of touch due to their huge speaking fees and trying to build a fortune out of just being the next Karadashians rather than anything sincere and Meghan is still unhappy and the great Sussex divorce happens in about five years and Harry goes back to the UK alone.

Meanwhile Will and Kate do the actual duty and become widely and quietly respected for their pragmatism and stiff upper lip and duty to the British state. And they've got Meghan out of the picture.

The Queen is never stepping down. She doesn't do abdication. So your theory is destroyed by your lack of knowledge of the monarchy and what it actually does.


But she is under public pressure to step down from some quarters, and this gives her another excuse. Honestly, though, she's almost 94. She won't live that much longer.


Megan and Harry are extremely popular especially with progressive to moderates, under 65 crowd, multinationals etc. They'll do fine. The people that hate them like the crazy poster have always hated them. The racist older white lady demographic has never been a part of their brand.

Canada will do well too. One paper estimated that Harry and Megan brought in over 2B to England in tourism. Canada does not have anything at the level of the Sussex family and their choosing Canada will help Canadain tourism.

The pressure to step down is coming from Charles aides who have been trying to push things along and accelerate things. This will stall that for a bit. She'll step aside eventually when she becomes ill.



they are relatively popular with progressives as progressive royals. and they would continue to be so because progressives would continually side with vs more conservative members of the royal family. but the calculus changes significantly if they are not royals. it’s nice that they are progressive and all but not all that interesting especially as they get older. who will care about them 15 years from now? they used to be royals and they were a big deal once but progressives ultimately don’t care about royalty of any sort. it was only in their role as “bad royals” that they were interesting.
Anonymous
The emasculation of Prince Harry (AKA, the most whipped royal ever) continues apace.

The toxic impact of SJW Hollywood feminism on Western man cannot be understated.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This looks like it will end up working out in most everyone's favor except Will and Kate.

Harry and Megan will get to live in Canada, make money, retain their titles, keep connected to the royal family when they travel back and give the finger to the British press. Charles should have no problem kicking lesser royals off the duty and public payroll list now that his own son has stepped back. The Queen has a reason to delay giving the throne to Charles with all the "crisis". Will loses because he and Kate will need to pick up more of the royal duties and they have a history of trying to avoid as much work as possible. They also will end up with the brunt of the British press problems now.


Alternatively, Meghan and Harry become seen as greedy and out of touch due to their huge speaking fees and trying to build a fortune out of just being the next Karadashians rather than anything sincere and Meghan is still unhappy and the great Sussex divorce happens in about five years and Harry goes back to the UK alone.

Meanwhile Will and Kate do the actual duty and become widely and quietly respected for their pragmatism and stiff upper lip and duty to the British state. And they've got Meghan out of the picture.

The Queen is never stepping down. She doesn't do abdication. So your theory is destroyed by your lack of knowledge of the monarchy and what it actually does.


But she is under public pressure to step down from some quarters, and this gives her another excuse. Honestly, though, she's almost 94. She won't live that much longer.


I wouldn’t count her out. Ppl have been expecting her to die since the 90s. I do however think Phillip to be gone by her Diamond Jubilee.


So, you think she’ll still be queen 10 years from now? When she’s well into being a centenarian?


DP. Wouldn't bet against her.


lol

So, you think the queen is immortal?



Her mother was 102 when she died.
Anonymous
Lady Louise Windsor is 16. She's a favorite with the Queen and would make a good spokesperson in a few years. Her brother is too young.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Interesting statement. I agree with the Sun analysis.

The Queen calls them Harry and Meghan, not the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/10730652/queen-statement-meghan-markle-prince-harry/amp/


The Sun is a rag.

The Queen sounds like the loving grandmother that she is. She is very loving of Harry.


Perhaps, but it’s a sentiment shared by nearly every single newspaper. I would post here but it’s hard to post multiple articles using a phone.



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The emasculation of Prince Harry (AKA, the most whipped royal ever) continues apace.

The toxic impact of SJW Hollywood feminism on Western man cannot be understated.




He's moving out of his grandmother's house and giving up his grandmother's money.... it's sort of the opposite of emasculated.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The emasculation of Prince Harry (AKA, the most whipped royal ever) continues apace.

The toxic impact of SJW Hollywood feminism on Western man cannot be understated.




He's moving out of his grandmother's house and giving up his grandmother's money.... it's sort of the opposite of emasculated.

Hardly! - DP
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Interesting statement. I agree with the Sun analysis.

The Queen calls them Harry and Meghan, not the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/10730652/queen-statement-meghan-markle-prince-harry/amp/


The Sun is a rag.

The Queen sounds like the loving grandmother that she is. She is very loving of Harry.


Perhaps, but it’s a sentiment shared by nearly every single newspaper. I would post here but it’s hard to post multiple articles using a phone.





https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1227840/meghan-markle-prince-harry-lose-sussex-title-queen-statement-sandringham

https://pagesix.com/2020/01/13/queen-may-have-dropped-hint-about-harry-and-meghan-losing-titles/

https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/entertainment/a30497606/meghan-markle-prince-harry-royal-titles/

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a30500404/prince-harry-meghan-markle-no-sussex-title-queen-statement/

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-prince-harrys-high-21274198
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Lady Louise Windsor is 16. She's a favorite with the Queen and would make a good spokesperson in a few years. Her brother is too young.


The young royals don’t start taking on engagements until after college. Will + Harry didn’t start major tours until they were near 25. Before that they did 1-2 with Charles which negates having additional HRHs if Edward or Sophie need to be there too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:D-list actress & no one in America knew her name.. small role on a small network show.. wasn’t a celebrity until she used Serena & then Piers to meet Harry at elite London Wimbledon after parties & started dating him.. She chased him.


Stop perpetuating lies. They met through a mutual friend, some baron’s daughter who worked in PR. Apparently it took this woman a long time to get the H&M to make time to meet. Their schedule’s kept conflicting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:D-list actress & no one in America knew her name.. small role on a small network show.. wasn’t a celebrity until she used Serena & then Piers to meet Harry at elite London Wimbledon after parties & started dating him.. She chased him.


Stop perpetuating lies. They met through a mutual friend, some baron’s daughter who worked in PR. Apparently it took this woman a long time to get the H&M to make time to meet. Their schedule’s kept conflicting.



....and Meghan had that pesky boyfriend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.


Or Australian Margot Robbie! She's so perfect. Looks like a princess.



Mmm... you mean she is white, while as the Black biracial Meghan does not....


Np- I don’t find the woman posted above attractive at all.


She’s a bottled blonde. That’s all that matters.
Anonymous
MM did chase Harry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The emasculation of Prince Harry (AKA, the most whipped royal ever) continues apace.

The toxic impact of SJW Hollywood feminism on Western man cannot be understated.




He's moving out of his grandmother's house and giving up his grandmother's money.... it's sort of the opposite of emasculated.

What a great sacrifice. He’s giving up a whopping 5% of his income and will still live off the family teat.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
This looks like it will end up working out in most everyone's favor except Will and Kate.

Harry and Megan will get to live in Canada, make money, retain their titles, keep connected to the royal family when they travel back and give the finger to the British press. Charles should have no problem kicking lesser royals off the duty and public payroll list now that his own son has stepped back. The Queen has a reason to delay giving the throne to Charles with all the "crisis". Will loses because he and Kate will need to pick up more of the royal duties and they have a history of trying to avoid as much work as possible. They also will end up with the brunt of the British press problems now.


Alternatively, Meghan and Harry become seen as greedy and out of touch due to their huge speaking fees and trying to build a fortune out of just being the next Karadashians rather than anything sincere and Meghan is still unhappy and the great Sussex divorce happens in about five years and Harry goes back to the UK alone.

Meanwhile Will and Kate do the actual duty and become widely and quietly respected for their pragmatism and stiff upper lip and duty to the British state. And they've got Meghan out of the picture.

The Queen is never stepping down. She doesn't do abdication. So your theory is destroyed by your lack of knowledge of the monarchy and what it actually does.


But she is under public pressure to step down from some quarters, and this gives her another excuse. Honestly, though, she's almost 94. She won't live that much longer.


Megan and Harry are extremely popular especially with progressive to moderates, under 65 crowd, multinationals etc. They'll do fine. The people that hate them like the crazy poster have always hated them. The racist older white lady demographic has never been a part of their brand.

Canada will do well too. One paper estimated that Harry and Megan brought in over 2B to England in tourism. Canada does not have anything at the level of the Sussex family and their choosing Canada will help Canadain tourism.

The pressure to step down is coming from Charles aides who have been trying to push things along and accelerate things. This will stall that for a bit. She'll step aside eventually when she becomes ill.



Where's this idea that they're extremely popular? Even with the young progressive crowd?

Woke people aren't into royalty to begin with. That's the antithesis of being progressive! Young urban progressives in the UK are anti monarchy and pro Republican so how does that square up with Meghan and Harry keeping any popularity? You think progressives are going go be thrilled by some entitled couple racking up huge speaking fees just because of their royal titles? What wonderful wisdom will they be able to give us at those expensive speeches in front of other rich people? How to save the environment while still having a private jet?

And without the royal connections, what exactly are they? Uh? Some kind of useless celebs? They're a dime a dozen.

I'm sure they'll be fine. But like all royals who move away from the orbit they'll fade away. It happened to the Windsors. They were glamorous people among jet setters but irrelevant and hardly popular.

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: