Boundary Review Meetings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

The taxpayers do not want boundary changes and prefer adding capacity rather than reshuffling kids. They've made this clear when they've voted for School Board members, voted for school bonds, and spoken up in the earlier review of the FCPS boundary policy.

The current School Board ignored this because they got giddy with the idea that they could effect equity-driven boundary changes at schools like Langley by claiming the changes were driven by cost and efficiency considerations. Then they got cold feet, as they always do, and now we're left with this sad little turd of a "county-wide" boundary review that wasn't necessary in the first place. Their focus always should have been on Coates, but by undertaking this larger fiasco they delayed relief at Coates for at least a year.

Umm Coates is being fixed in this boundary review and with the exact same timeline as it would’ve been had it been done by itself.

No. It should have been fixed for this school year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

+1. And when the dust settles few will be better off but thousands of kids will be devastated being forced to leave friends, teachers, coaches, and community.

Then we do it all again in a couple of years and then every couple of years in perpetuity.

I hate the school board.

They change the rules whenever it suits them. The 5-year rule's unlikely to be around in perpetuity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

The taxpayers do not want boundary changes and prefer adding capacity rather than reshuffling kids. They've made this clear when they've voted for School Board members, voted for school bonds, and spoken up in the earlier review of the FCPS boundary policy.

The current School Board ignored this because they got giddy with the idea that they could effect equity-driven boundary changes at schools like Langley by claiming the changes were driven by cost and efficiency considerations. Then they got cold feet, as they always do, and now we're left with this sad little turd of a "county-wide" boundary review that wasn't necessary in the first place. Their focus always should have been on Coates, but by undertaking this larger fiasco they delayed relief at Coates for at least a year.

Umm Coates is being fixed in this boundary review and with the exact same timeline as it would’ve been had it been done by itself.

No. It should have been fixed for this school year.

Correct. Appears the School Board shills want to spread misinformation again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

The taxpayers do not want boundary changes and prefer adding capacity rather than reshuffling kids. They've made this clear when they've voted for School Board members, voted for school bonds, and spoken up in the earlier review of the FCPS boundary policy.

The current School Board ignored this because they got giddy with the idea that they could effect equity-driven boundary changes at schools like Langley by claiming the changes were driven by cost and efficiency considerations. Then they got cold feet, as they always do, and now we're left with this sad little turd of a "county-wide" boundary review that wasn't necessary in the first place. Their focus always should have been on Coates, but by undertaking this larger fiasco they delayed relief at Coates for at least a year.

Umm Coates is being fixed in this boundary review and with the exact same timeline as it would’ve been had it been done by itself.

This is not right. Coates would’ve been fixed for this year (September 25) but they wrapped that individual fix into the comprehensive review. It’s reprehensible that they delayed it for an unnecessary study.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

The taxpayers do not want boundary changes and prefer adding capacity rather than reshuffling kids. They've made this clear when they've voted for School Board members, voted for school bonds, and spoken up in the earlier review of the FCPS boundary policy.

The current School Board ignored this because they got giddy with the idea that they could effect equity-driven boundary changes at schools like Langley by claiming the changes were driven by cost and efficiency considerations. Then they got cold feet, as they always do, and now we're left with this sad little turd of a "county-wide" boundary review that wasn't necessary in the first place. Their focus always should have been on Coates, but by undertaking this larger fiasco they delayed relief at Coates for at least a year.

Umm Coates is being fixed in this boundary review and with the exact same timeline as it would’ve been had it been done by itself.

No. It should have been fixed for this school year.

Correct. Appears the School Board shills want to spread misinformation again.

+2. Although I leave open the possibility that the person was just ignorant and not lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

The taxpayers do not want boundary changes and prefer adding capacity rather than reshuffling kids. They've made this clear when they've voted for School Board members, voted for school bonds, and spoken up in the earlier review of the FCPS boundary policy.

The current School Board ignored this because they got giddy with the idea that they could effect equity-driven boundary changes at schools like Langley by claiming the changes were driven by cost and efficiency considerations. Then they got cold feet, as they always do, and now we're left with this sad little turd of a "county-wide" boundary review that wasn't necessary in the first place. Their focus always should have been on Coates, but by undertaking this larger fiasco they delayed relief at Coates for at least a year.

Umm Coates is being fixed in this boundary review and with the exact same timeline as it would’ve been had it been done by itself.

This is not right. Coates would’ve been fixed for this year (September 25) but they wrapped that individual fix into the comprehensive review. It’s reprehensible that they delayed it for an unnecessary study.

Correct. From FCPS website:

On February 8, 2024 the Fairfax County School Board approved the FY 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program, with the amendment to include Coates Elementary in the Priority Recommended Boundary Adjustments table, with potential boundary scoping in the Fall of 2024 or Spring 2025. This inclusion of Coates Elementary in the approved CIP will allow staff to address the current and projected capacity deficit, student membership growth at the school, and the number of temporary classrooms at the school.

As of SY 2024-25, the school is at 137% capacity utilization, and is projected to be at 163% in SY 2029-30. The school site currently utilizes 20 temporary classrooms.

Given the ongoing comprehensive boundary review,[b] the Coates ES boundary study will be prioritized in that effort. A community meeting was held on May 7, 2025 to review solutions for SY 2025-26.[/b]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

The taxpayers do not want boundary changes and prefer adding capacity rather than reshuffling kids. They've made this clear when they've voted for School Board members, voted for school bonds, and spoken up in the earlier review of the FCPS boundary policy.

The current School Board ignored this because they got giddy with the idea that they could effect equity-driven boundary changes at schools like Langley by claiming the changes were driven by cost and efficiency considerations. Then they got cold feet, as they always do, and now we're left with this sad little turd of a "county-wide" boundary review that wasn't necessary in the first place. Their focus always should have been on Coates, but by undertaking this larger fiasco they delayed relief at Coates for at least a year.

This taxpayer does not want to see spending on new capacity until the county can efficiently use the space it already has. Tough decisions need to be made on boundaries and even closing some schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

The taxpayers do not want boundary changes and prefer adding capacity rather than reshuffling kids. They've made this clear when they've voted for School Board members, voted for school bonds, and spoken up in the earlier review of the FCPS boundary policy.

The current School Board ignored this because they got giddy with the idea that they could effect equity-driven boundary changes at schools like Langley by claiming the changes were driven by cost and efficiency considerations. Then they got cold feet, as they always do, and now we're left with this sad little turd of a "county-wide" boundary review that wasn't necessary in the first place. Their focus always should have been on Coates, but by undertaking this larger fiasco they delayed relief at Coates for at least a year.

This taxpayer does not want to see spending on new capacity until the county can efficiently use the space it already has. Tough decisions need to be made on boundaries and even closing some schools.

And your position does not prevail. You can send out your semi-annual taxpayer bulletins and reminisce about the prior elections you lost, but it won’t sway many people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

I agree with you and I 100% support the Sangster split feeder all going to Lake Braddock.

It makes perfect sense and is the best long term solution and least disruptive solution for WSHS. Taking all of Sangster and sending the entire school to Lake Braddock with the split feeder going with the 80% other Sangster students, combined with the demographic population drops over the next few years at both WSHS and Lake Braddock, will set the stage where neither school will need rezoning in the next 5 year cycle (looking at population drops in both sets of feeder schools in 6th grade and younger.)

The moves out of WSHS in map 4 are the best possible solutions for WSHS and 90% of the communities zoned for WSHS. Moving Rolling Valley split feeder into WSHS is a bad move for WSHS, because it negates any benefits from moving Sangster out, setting the stage for another painful rezoning in 5 years. It also harms Lewis. My vote is that FCPS keeps the moves out of WSHS and does not move RV into WSHS.

After the initial fight and pain, it will also be the best long term solution for the Sangster community as a whole. In a year or two, after a 6th grade class or two moves on intact with their friends and communities to Lake Braddock, they are going to wonder why they fought this sensible rezoning so hard.

That being said, people don't like change, even very positive changes like what is proposed in map 4 for Sangster, so they are going to fight like wildcats to prevent change. Any one of us would do the same.

I don't fault them for fighting, even if I don't agree with any of their arguments and think that for WSHS as a whole, their move to LB is the best long term solution. But I understand the fight they are making.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

I agree with you and I 100% support the Sangster split feeder all going to Lake Braddock.

It makes perfect sense and is the best long term solution and least disruptive solution for WSHS. Taking all of Sangster and sending the entire school to Lake Braddock with the split feeder going with the 80% other Sangster students, combined with the demographic population drops over the next few years at both WSHS and Lake Braddock, will set the stage where neither school will need rezoning in the next 5 year cycle (looking at population drops in both sets of feeder schools in 6th grade and younger.)

The moves out of WSHS in map 4 are the best possible solutions for WSHS and 90% of the communities zoned for WSHS. Moving Rolling Valley split feeder into WSHS is a bad move for WSHS, because it negates any benefits from moving Sangster out, setting the stage for another painful rezoning in 5 years. It also harms Lewis. My vote is that FCPS keeps the moves out of WSHS and does not move RV into WSHS.

After the initial fight and pain, it will also be the best long term solution for the Sangster community as a whole. In a year or two, after a 6th grade class or two moves on intact with their friends and communities to Lake Braddock, they are going to wonder why they fought this sensible rezoning so hard.

That being said, people don't like change, even very positive changes like what is proposed in map 4 for Sangster, so they are going to fight like wildcats to prevent change. Any one of us would do the same.

I don't fault them for fighting, even if I don't agree with any of their arguments and think that for WSHS as a whole, their move to LB is the best long term solution. But I understand the fight they are making.

+1 But I can understand current Irving and siblings of WSHS students allowed to be grandfathered in if they choose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many families upset at the boundary changes. The only ones that seem to be happy are those that are being moved to a school that they view as better than the one they are assigned to. Reid is going to move forward with these changes, talk about how she was able to re-district one of the largest school systems in the country...and then leave FCPS with us living and sorting out the mess.

Not necessarily.

Sangster is upset about getting moved to a school virtually equal to WSHS in every metric, that 80% of their community attends and is only 1 mile ish difference in commute time.

People don't want to change schools, even if the schools are equal and attending the new school makes far more sense than their current school, the move fixes overcrowding in the least disruptive way possible for the current overcrowded high school, and the new school is more of a community school for them than attending the school they are currently assigned to.

Rezoning is NOT welcome by the community, even when it makes perfect sense and the new school is equal or better, like the Sangster split feeder and a few other schools.


I think a better observation is that the only people happy with rezoning are those getting moved to a *significantly* better high school, such as the Rolling Valley neighborhood getting rezoned to WSHS from Lewis.

Yep, and even if the parents like the move to the significantly better school, the kids typically do not because they have established communities. The boundary review comes at significant mental health costs to our students.

Turns out that the vast majority of families just don’t want to be moved. If only the school board would listen to that message.

But everyone can't just get what they want. That is how we end up with situations like West Potomac. Expanded when space was available next door at Mt. Vernon. Someone has to look out for the whole picture and the taxpayer.

I agree with you and I 100% support the Sangster split feeder all going to Lake Braddock.

It makes perfect sense and is the best long term solution and least disruptive solution for WSHS. Taking all of Sangster and sending the entire school to Lake Braddock with the split feeder going with the 80% other Sangster students, combined with the demographic population drops over the next few years at both WSHS and Lake Braddock, will set the stage where neither school will need rezoning in the next 5 year cycle (looking at population drops in both sets of feeder schools in 6th grade and younger.)

The moves out of WSHS in map 4 are the best possible solutions for WSHS and 90% of the communities zoned for WSHS. Moving Rolling Valley split feeder into WSHS is a bad move for WSHS, because it negates any benefits from moving Sangster out, setting the stage for another painful rezoning in 5 years. It also harms Lewis. My vote is that FCPS keeps the moves out of WSHS and does not move RV into WSHS.

After the initial fight and pain, it will also be the best long term solution for the Sangster community as a whole. In a year or two, after a 6th grade class or two moves on intact with their friends and communities to Lake Braddock, they are going to wonder why they fought this sensible rezoning so hard.

That being said, people don't like change, even very positive changes like what is proposed in map 4 for Sangster, so they are going to fight like wildcats to prevent change. Any one of us would do the same.

I don't fault them for fighting, even if I don't agree with any of their arguments and think that for WSHS as a whole, their move to LB is the best long term solution. But I understand the fight they are making.

+1 But I can understand current Irving and siblings of WSHS students allowed to be grandfathered in if they choose.

Absolutely!

Current Irving students should be given the option to grandfather to WSHS, especially if their older siblings are current 9th, 10th or 11th graders at WSHS.

I don't think younger siblings should be grandfathered if the older sibling is a class of 2026 graduating senior though. Nor should 6th grade and younger students with a WSHS older sibling. It should be limited to current Irving students, in my opinion, or the scope and duration will just be too expansive.

[Anonymous]

Are they planning on moving students to the new Western High School in 2026? I seriously can't keep up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are they planning on moving students to the new Western High School in 2026? I seriously can't keep up!

A just saw something about FCPS delaying it to 2027.

So there will be a boundary change in 2026 AND 2027.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are they planning on moving students to the new Western High School in 2026? I seriously can't keep up!

They are pretty much making it optional for everyone but they are planning to open for the 2026-2027 school year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are they planning on moving students to the new Western High School in 2026? I seriously can't keep up!

They are pretty much making it optional for everyone but they are planning to open for the 2026-2027 school year.

Go to the other thread. Not so sure. Meren sent an email that confuses the issue for me.