The Official Jill Biden Style and Fashion Thread

Anonymous
Jill looks great.
Anonymous
She looks good. That dress is depressing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Vogue: Where you can be the least fashionable person in a room but still get a cover, cuz atleast you’re a dem.

Obviously we all know she didn’t get this because she looks good (she doesn’t). She has the right politics. Well good for her I guess. Looks won’t get you everywhere in life and they didn’t get her to Vogue.


Did you know that Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, and Laura Bush, none of whom were particularly at the forefront of fashion, but all of whom were married to Republican presidents, were also on the cover of Vogue?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Vogue: Where you can be the least fashionable person in a room but still get a cover, cuz atleast you’re a dem.

Obviously we all know she didn’t get this because she looks good (she doesn’t). She has the right politics. Well good for her I guess. Looks won’t get you everywhere in life and they didn’t get her to Vogue.


Did you know that Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, and Laura Bush, none of whom were particularly at the forefront of fashion, but all of whom were married to Republican presidents, were also on the cover of Vogue?



So what you're saying is that the ONLY modern day Republican first lady that wasn't on Vogue was [gasp] Melania? The ONLY one who used to be a MODEL? OMG, that's OUTRAGEOUS!! It must be the antifa's fault.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Vogue: Where you can be the least fashionable person in a room but still get a cover, cuz atleast you’re a dem.

Obviously we all know she didn’t get this because she looks good (she doesn’t). She has the right politics. Well good for her I guess. Looks won’t get you everywhere in life and they didn’t get her to Vogue.


Did you know that Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, and Laura Bush, none of whom were particularly at the forefront of fashion, but all of whom were married to Republican presidents, were also on the cover of Vogue?



This…isn’t true at all lol. Laura nor Barbara were on the cover of Vogue. Anna Wintour has been atleast honest about her liberal bias… you on the other hand sound like clown.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Vogue: Where you can be the least fashionable person in a room but still get a cover, cuz atleast you’re a dem.

Obviously we all know she didn’t get this because she looks good (she doesn’t). She has the right politics. Well good for her I guess. Looks won’t get you everywhere in life and they didn’t get her to Vogue.


Did you know that Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, and Laura Bush, none of whom were particularly at the forefront of fashion, but all of whom were married to Republican presidents, were also on the cover of Vogue?



This…isn’t true at all lol. Laura nor Barbara were on the cover of Vogue. Anna Wintour has been atleast honest about her liberal bias… you on the other hand sound like clown.

Why are you so butthurt about this?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I know Melania is fuming!!


About Jill’s hair? Lol

Jill Biden should ask Melania for the name of her wig-maker.


Ya know, some people actually have full hair. I’m one of those people. I have long hair that’s very full, holds a wave or curl. Not everyone needs extensions. Assumptions are very dnagerous

Hi Melania! It’s okay to have extensions!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I know Melania is fuming!!


About Jill’s hair? Lol

Jill Biden should ask Melania for the name of her wig-maker.


Ya know, some people actually have full hair. I’m one of those people. I have long hair that’s very full, holds a wave or curl. Not everyone needs extensions. Assumptions are very dnagerous


Ya, we know. Some people do! Melania is not one of them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Vogue: Where you can be the least fashionable person in a room but still get a cover, cuz atleast you’re a dem.

Obviously we all know she didn’t get this because she looks good (she doesn’t). She has the right politics. Well good for her I guess. Looks won’t get you everywhere in life and they didn’t get her to Vogue.


Did you know that Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, and Laura Bush, none of whom were particularly at the forefront of fashion, but all of whom were married to Republican presidents, were also on the cover of Vogue?



This…isn’t true at all lol. Laura nor Barbara were on the cover of Vogue. Anna Wintour has been atleast honest about her liberal bias… you on the other hand sound like clown.

Why are you so butthurt about this?


You were owned and now asking why PP is the one “butthurt”? Who even talks like that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:














First Ladies in Vogue


Hillary looks so great.
So Melania wasn’t asked to be in Vogue?


What beautiful shots. Yeah, Hillary--I don't think I've ever seen her look so good. She's usually not photogenic at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What I think most of you are missing is that she's not TRYING to be particularly fashionable or stylish, she wants the general public to think "oh, she's just like me" and she's doing a very good job of that.

I’ve seen a lot of her over the years and I totally get that. She wears a LOT of flowered dresses and she looks like herself here, so IMO whatever you think she and Leibovitz are trying to pull off, she’s doing it. Hillary and Laura, while I admire them and they look amazing, definitely do not. Eleanor freaking Roosevelt isn’t even doing it. Barbara and Rosalynn are. Melania hasn’t looked like herself in 30 years.
Anonymous
So Bess Trumen and Melania were the only first ladies of the last century not to make Vogue?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Vogue: Where you can be the least fashionable person in a room but still get a cover, cuz atleast you’re a dem.

Obviously we all know she didn’t get this because she looks good (she doesn’t). She has the right politics. Well good for her I guess. Looks won’t get you everywhere in life and they didn’t get her to Vogue.


Did you know that Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, and Laura Bush, none of whom were particularly at the forefront of fashion, but all of whom were married to Republican presidents, were also on the cover of Vogue?



This…isn’t true at all lol. Laura nor Barbara were on the cover of Vogue. Anna Wintour has been atleast honest about her liberal bias… you on the other hand sound like clown.

Why are you so butthurt about this?


You were owned and now asking why PP is the one “butthurt”? Who even talks like that.

Owned? Your precious Melania is the one without a single Vogue cover.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:














First Ladies in Vogue


Hillary looks so great.
So Melania wasn’t asked to be in Vogue?

Why would she even want to be in Vogue, given how her husband is always railing against the “liberal media”?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Vogue: Where you can be the least fashionable person in a room but still get a cover, cuz atleast you’re a dem.

Obviously we all know she didn’t get this because she looks good (she doesn’t). She has the right politics. Well good for her I guess. Looks won’t get you everywhere in life and they didn’t get her to Vogue.


Did you know that Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, and Laura Bush, none of whom were particularly at the forefront of fashion, but all of whom were married to Republican presidents, were also on the cover of Vogue?


This…isn’t true at all lol. Laura nor Barbara were on the cover of Vogue. Anna Wintour has been atleast honest about her liberal bias… you on the other hand sound like clown.

True. Good explainer here: https://www.heraldtribune.com/opinion/20190630/harrop-vogue-doesnt-have-to-put-melania-on-its-cover
Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion
Go to: