Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You’re crazy. She looks feminine and classy. Love the florals and hope I look bad as good at her age. Go, Jill.
OMG, no. Just no. She is crying for help. Where's the poster who lambasted Usha Vance for not having a stylist?? Here's another for which I hav no words:

Right? That poster you refer to was incensed that Usha dared to have slightly crooked seams in her headshot!

Funny that she never comments on our previous First Lady’s absolutely awful fashion choices.
DP
I think Jill had better and worse fashion days, but she knew the assignment and generally followed it -- look like the approachable, slightly fun grandma. The florals worked for that (although I do think the one posted with the polka dots and random bits is beyond hideous.)
On the seam issue, I don't think it's reallyfair to compare a picture of Jill walking (when a dress will bunch) to one of Usha sitting (when someone should have said "just straighten the dress out")--but the problem with that dress wasn't really the seam as much as the totally unflattering color. I commented on the other thread that no one really knows the assignment for Usha at the moment. Should it be like professional lawyer lady (the Kamala Harris look) or like the yummy mummy look (Kate Middleton) or maybe something else? It took Michelle a minute to find the right look, and she went with "non-threatening Junior League type lady" (lots of twin sets and pastels and knee length skirts) for the first term and then more of a confident bold look for the second term with bright colors and patterns and lots of arm muscle. But I think it's pointless to compare Jill and Usha, since they are very different assignments. And no one considered Jill a huge fashionista -- when people posted positively about her dresses, it was like when your mom gets a nice dress at Dillard's and you'er like "Mom, I love that dress on you -- such a pretty color!"