I hear what you’re saying but I don’t fully agree. Schools can still make decisions based on income. Growing up in a large minority majority city, I would say that the disparity / discrimination is greater based on income. Rich UMC black/white/purple green segregate their kids from those on the wrong side of the tracks no matter whether they are the same race or not. |
Is this true? I think it is just more people going to college now than before, mostly women. Women tend to be more average, so the higher the percentage that go to college, you will end up with a higher share of women, as the below average pool is dominated by men. |
Yes! If only looking at college acceptance, obviously there are other factors in our society that are systemically racist. Again not every applicant can go to Harvard. There are limited seats. I also believe there are other great universities that are not Ivy League. |
They should require all applicants to include a list of academic enrichment classes/programs they took outside of the regular school day, and the dates of those classes.
This will allow admissions staff to recognize and weight the applications of those less able to afford such programs, on a race-blind basis. |
This is a great analogy. Thank you. If anyone is surprised by this: California banned affirmative action twice. Affirmative Action is not popular even in a very democratic state. And they banned it in 2020- with an even more larger majority of liberal voters and with a higher percentage of votes. Racism comes in all forms. And racism against Asians is a particularly sinuous type of racism which somehow the POC who think the Harvard admissions process was not racist - think is ok. Like- how are you NOT being racist? Yes, we get college degrees but we have to hide our culture, get even higher grades and more EC and sports, work even harder for everything and on top of that be ok with you guys thinking we don’t belong there because you belong there more. That is anti-Asian racism. |
It was blatantly Illegal. And huge lawsuits should be filed. It was absurd. |
You are just making shit up. No one used an Asian stereotype of personality. They are giving points to students who are engaged in activities and organizations and community causes, as they should. The ability to contribute to group projects and engage with other people is a valuable asset and skill. Plenty of Asian kids are involved in activities and get the deserved boost for it. Antisocial hermits do not contribute as much to a school or to society, no matter their race or test scores. |
But they had to do even more to get in. That’s the problem. They didn’t want more Asians so they raised the bar to impossible levels for Asians and lowered it for Hispanics and Blacks. And this isn’t just Harvard. It’s everywhere. So you can argue that they get degrees and such- but they have to work three times as hard to get half as much. Sounds like racism, no? |
Obama voted as a Senator to deny Alito a vote on the Senate floor. They should have voted against all his picks, not just Garland. |
Different standards for skin color and facial features by an entity accepting tax money is disgraceful and illegal. |
No. You’re being racist here. And they totally did this to Asians. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/06/harvard-admissions-personality/563198/ Also, there was another article about how the alumni would meet Asians and rank the personality is good. And for the record: Asians aren’t all anti-social hermits. Just like black men aren’t all violent criminals. Because that’s racist. |
Is this going to apply to government jobs as well? |
Here’s a mental exercise for you. Answer it before you post this stupid logic again, as if you are making any kind of cogent argument. Compare the GPA, SAT scores, MCAT scores etc. for all students admitted to universities like Harvard and into medical school matriculating classes. Then try to sit there with a straight face and tell me there isn’t a system wide bias against Asians where they are being held to much higher standards than other peers. 72% of Asians have college degrees. Now tell me how many Fortune 500 companies have Asians in leadership positions and in C suite positions. The systematic bias against Asians starts early at college and continues on after. Asians are too good for colleges and ruin diversity quotas, therefore we need to give them negative scores for personality while requiring they have much higher GPAs and SAT scores compared to their peers. Professional world: Sorry Asians, you were good, but your personalities make you unsuitable for leadership positions. Thank you for doing all of our research and innovation. But no leadership for you! You can even keep going to government. How many Asians are running the country, counties, and cities despite all of that education you keep pointing to? I’m glad Asians are rising up and standing up for themselves. Yeah, they’re blowing all of you halfwits and lazy parents out of the water, and now they will break out of their timid shells to own you on the racial stereotypes of their personalities you use to keep their numbers artificially lower at top universities and out of positions of power in the corporate world and government. In case you haven’t noticed, the west is on the decline while we are beginning a brand new rise of an Asian based century that may mast for a very long time. |
Omg they do not have to do more to get in. You act like Asian kids have cornered the market on amazing. Have you read about some of the achievements of high school kids applying to Harvard?! |
This has been going on for decades. Letting in less qualified students because of race leads to students who will have a harder time at the tougher colleges. Some manage it, others do not, who would have done better at a lower tier college that suited their academic profile. But the colleges want their diversity and make an offer that is hard to refuse. |