Nice try. Poor trolling. We had virtual meetings (both public and internal administrative) during the pandemic. Any attempt to use the current weather as an excuse to ram through the highly unpopular Option H will be met with even more resistance than it has been to this point. |
Many of us have shoveled multiple times but it hasn’t helped. We still have a 30 minute bus ride to our local school. |
H isn't unpopular county-wide. There are just a few people who don't like it. Most people don't want to pay the extra taxes that would be necessary to keep Wootton as a segregated school. |
You’re still here? It’s clear that you’re in favor of Option H because of your bias against Wootton. We get it. Please list the extra taxes you will be forced to pay solely because Wootton stays in its current facility with minor remediation. And before you repeat your fundraising point, there is money available. Let’s leave Wootton where it is for now and do a forensic audit of MCPS’ books. I’m sure you aren’t opposed to rooting out fraud, waste, abuse, and sweetheart sole source procurements. While we’re doing that, let’s find out of there have been any communications with Crown developers about moving Wootton into Crown. I’m sure you also aren’t opposed to transparency. There are lots of unanswered questions that need answers before an irrevocable decision is made that will disrupt the lives of 10,000+ voters and cost the county millions of dollars. |
Wootton, Magruder and Damascus are all against H. How is it popular? Only crown people think it’s popular. I don’t think MCPS can force three clusters to accept something they don’t want. |
+1. Mr./Ms. Troll will now respond with “what’s your solution then?” We’ve given our solution, namely, maintain the status quo and use Crown’s excess capacity as a holding school. Wootton can be remediated while the permanent enrollment picture of Crown becomes clearer. There is money for this, as apparently MCPS’ desire is to use Wootton’s current building as a holding school. This means remediation is required regardless whether Wootton closes and moves to Crown. |
RAM |
RESISTANCE |
Where are you hearing this? Seriously, give us a source because zoom has been a thing since even before the pandemic and now is almost the preferred way of meeting so I'm going to need a source for the necessity of in person meetings to figure this mess out. But anyway, sorry you feel defeated. That is never good to feel. |
|
Looks like the Maryland Building Industry Association is opposed to Option H, claiming that it “would permanently reduce high school capacity in a designated growth area and disrupt the alignment between school infrastructure and planned residential development.”
https://montgomeryperspective.com/2026/01/27/builders-oppose-relocating-wootton-high-school/ |
Wow. Opposition is snowballing (pun intended). |
Why do they characterize using Wootton as a holding facility as long-term, but using Crown as a holding facility as temporary? Wouldn't the use of either building as a holding facility be expected to cover the same period of time? |
Extra taxes--give me a break! We already pay more than enough taxes for thing I do not want. Happy to have my current large tax bill appropriated to fund an already excellent school, like Wootton (not my cluster, in case you wonder). |
Because if Wootton is a temporary holding school, then crown is also a temporary holding school for Wootton. Why need 2 holding schools? |
You are the ones who started this. Talk to your advocates to back down. Remediation will happen but not on your schedule. The mold will always be there. |