Fire in upper NW?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i am also wondering who placed the money in the envelope and on the porch. The driver may have opened the envelope and threw it in the front seat or floor board. It may have fingerprints on the envelope. I am certain the police have the envelope.

You think? I mean they got the DNA from the crust in the burned house.....

Does the house look burned to the ground to you?

The point was that the PP certainly hoped they had the envelope. Considering where they got the DNA from I am pretty sure they either have or are looking for the envelope. Seriously people, they do this for a living. They had the crust long before we even knew about the pizza delivery.

[Anonymous]

To the person who made the fuc*** nuts comment. You must not have children. People are weird and choosy about toppings. But, I will cease making comments regarding the pizza.

[Anonymous]

I've never heard of leaving pizza on a stoop. You don't think the Dominoes guy found that odd?

[Anonymous]

I still think he had at least one accomplice. If he gives himself up, he will claim that he did not commit the murders and that “the other guy did it.” Not that it matters because I believe he can still be charged with Murder 1 since he was involved. He will give up the name(s) of the accomplice(s). He will probably cop to ditching and burning the car. But, that will be all. He probably has an attorney right now trying to get a deal worked out.
Far as I am concerned, he can rot in hell.

[Anonymous]

I don't understand people's investment in him being a lowlife thug. is this about race? He has a legit employment history, a rap sheet that is not terribly impressive, a normal, hardworking family of birth. that isn't clearing his name (he is a fucking monster), but he isn't a thug.

he does have dreds. Would you call the guy in Charlotte a lowlife thug? The guys who killed the Connecticut family are called career criminals not low life thugs, and this guy isn't even a career criminal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i wonder how much of the case can be cracked on the basis of the pizza order alone.....

He must have placed his order over the phone, so whoever took his order might have remembered his voice/accent.
Unless he had one of the hostages place the order, but that'd be weird.

This entire story is horrifying and bizarre beyond belief!

I order from that Dominos all the time and never talk to anyone. Order online and when my teen is home alone I tell him to put the money in an envelope outside. I don't let him open the door for anyone.

You don't let your teenager open the door to the pizza delivery guy?

Not when he is home alone. He can't open it for anyone. Frankly it is more to keep his friends out but he doesn't know it. The rule is the rule.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've never heard of leaving pizza on a stoop. You don't think the Dominoes guy found that odd?

I thought it was odd and would think Dominoes would find it odd. But maybe not!?!? The only time I've seen/heard of this is in Home Alone.

[Anonymous]

Do any states still use the electric chair?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To the person who made the fuc*** nuts comment. You must not have children. People are weird and choosy about toppings. But, I will cease making comments regarding the pizza.

I made the comment. I don't have children. I stand by my assertion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand people's investment in him being a lowlife thug. is this about race? He has a legit employment history, a rap sheet that is not terribly impressive, a normal, hardworking family of birth. that isn't clearing his name (he is a fucking monster), but he isn't a thug.

he does have dreds. Would you call the guy in Charlotte a lowlife thug? The guys who killed the Connecticut family are called career criminals not low life thugs, and this guy isn't even a career criminal

His sexual assault qualifies him as a thug along with Jesse Matthews and the guys in CT. I also put the motorcycle gang guys into the thug category.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I still think he had at least one accomplice. If he gives himself up, he will claim that he did not commit the murders and that “the other guy did it.” Not that it matters because I believe he can still be charged with Murder 1 since he was involved. He will give up the name(s) of the accomplice(s). He will probably cop to ditching and burning the car. But, that will be all. He probably has an attorney right now trying to get a deal worked out.
Far as I am concerned, he can rot in hell.

The investigators said that they believe that there was more than one person. They only have the confirmed DNA of one person and that is who they are going after right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

And if they had had a dog, the pizza crust would not be there, and the crime would be unsolved.

They have two dogs and a cat. If pizza was up on a table or in trash can, the pets couldn't reach that...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ordering a fucking pizza in the middle of a hostage situation is so bizarre that it indicates nothing beyond its own absurdity.

This! and someone was hungry

He set fire to the house and car probably to destroy evidence. Erased the videos but forgot the crust! So banal and dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've never heard of leaving pizza on a stoop. You don't think the Dominoes guy found that odd?

I think if the Domino's guy opened the envelope and found a lot more money than was required to buy that particular pizza, he wouldn't put aside his shock.

As for being able to tell about someone via toppings, if I order a pizza that has sausage and mushrooms, everyone who knows me will know that I am not the intended recipient of that pizza, since I am a vegetarian who despises mushrooms. So I think this would fall under "no such thing as a stupid question" but strongly suspect that they have better leads than this. If the pizza crust hadn't been the thing that broke the case, I would have thought the pizza angle to be too crazy for words, but here we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

Not really, because the guy had a huge rap sheet and wasn't being put away from society.

I think you missed the point about the pizza crust. How did it survive intact?

We don't know if the fire reached other parts of the house other than the second floor & attic.