Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since Ford is afraid to fly, did she begin her cross-country drive 5 days ago?

She also had her polygraph done in MD on Aug. 7. Wondering if she flew or drive. I know she was vacationing on the east coast during this time, according to the letter she gave to Feinstein.

Finally, someone is asking the important questions.
/s

Once a person is caught telling one lie, it throws their entire testimony into question. Why did she say she was afraid to fly? Just an excuse to not have tot testify under oath?

Exactly. Yet she easily flew out here for the pussy march.

She never said she was afraid to fly. People surmised it because she delined to come to DC on Monday.

The GOP has been told that Ford does not want to fly from her California home to Washington, according to the Republican senator, which means she may need to drive across the country. Ford has reportedly told friends she is uncomfortable in confined spaces, indicating a physical difficulty in making the trip by plane.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/21/trump-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-charges-834664

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

A) What does this have to do with her accusations?

B) For anyone who asks why women don't come forward with accusations, here's your reason: the accuser's life becomes subject to scrutiny.

As well it should. She apparently was nuts enough for an ex to file a restraining order against her.

I sense a pattern. When a woman makes an accusation, she's nuts. When a man makes an accusation, clearly the woman is in the wrong.

Let's just have the investigation and get it over with. This back and forth is going nowhere. If people want to get to the bottom of who is telling the truth, and let's face it, most Americans do care about this right now, we should have it out fully. Then move on. The Republicans are doing themselves no favors by just seeming as if they will do anything to get this guy seated, no matter what anyone says.

Are you suggesting that perhaps she is unstable? Like she may have had an traumatic episode in life?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

A) What does this have to do with her accusations?

B) For anyone who asks why women don't come forward with accusations, here's your reason: the accuser's life becomes subject to scrutiny.

As well it should. She apparently was nuts enough for an ex to file a restraining order against her.

I sense a pattern. When a woman makes an accusation, she's nuts. When a man makes an accusation, clearly the woman is in the wrong.

Let's just have the investigation and get it over with. This back and forth is going nowhere. If people want to get to the bottom of who is telling the truth, and let's face it, most Americans do care about this right now, we should have it out fully. Then move on. The Republicans are doing themselves no favors by just seeming as if they will do anything to get this guy seated, no matter what anyone says.

That's not what I think. I do think that when anyone is able to get a restraining order, then there's a very good chance that the other person is emotionally unstable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do any of you actually believe this “rape train” gang rape allegation?

I know it happened with Gtown Prep boys at the time. Whether this specific allegation is true, I don't know.

How do you know?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the WSJ:

Yes, so what?

She didn’t include this on her resume. The part about her working for this company were scrubbed from media accounts of her story.
And, Katz was her attorney.

Strange? You bet.

No it isn’t! I don’t list the job I was sexually harassed and filed a complaint either.

DP. Odd that Katz was her attorney. Did Katz, knowing her original client's story is falling apart, start calling former clients who had been sexually harrassed and would be willing to fabricate a story? Very odd connection.

You got it! Wait, are these people friends with Hillary?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. It looks the Senate Committee is releasing accounts by anonymous sources that have proven to be false as a way of creating doubt about the accounts of the named women who have come forward. Desperation.

Pretty much. That’s tacky. And despicable, but the GOP is basically a group of cads.

Cads?! Not really the first name that come to mind.

I’ve used up all my stronger words. I’ve reset to 1912.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

A) What does this have to do with her accusations?

B) For anyone who asks why women don't come forward with accusations, here's your reason: the accuser's life becomes subject to scrutiny.

As well it should. She apparently was nuts enough for an ex to file a restraining order against her.

I sense a pattern. When a woman makes an accusation, she's nuts. When a man makes an accusation, clearly the woman is in the wrong.

Let's just have the investigation and get it over with. This back and forth is going nowhere. If people want to get to the bottom of who is telling the truth, and let's face it, most Americans do care about this right now, we should have it out fully. Then move on. The Republicans are doing themselves no favors by just seeming as if they will do anything to get this guy seated, no matter what anyone says.

That's not what I think. I do think that when anyone is able to get a restraining order, then there's a very good chance that the other person is emotionally unstable.

Agreed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy who called in the Rhode Island boat incident has since recanted on twitter (definitely his account because the testimony from yesterday on page 37 https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/09.25.18%20BMK%20Interview%20Transcript%20(Redacted).pdf references a tweet dated June 27 2018 from his account).

He posted 2 hours ago:
"Do everyone who is going crazy about what I had said I have recanted because I have made a mistake and apologize for such mistake"

I'm not surprised by this.

But Dr. Ford's allegation was enough to warrant a FBI investigation.

No. It may warrant a criminal investigation, but neither Ford nor the latest accuser has filed police reports. An FBI background investigation would not address the alleged criminality involved. It would only involve taking statements from Ford, Kavanaugh and others and merely presenting them to the Senate. A criminal investigation would have to be conducted by a law enforcement agency with jurisdiction. FBI will not be issuing subpoenas, getting warrants, or anything else associated with a criminal investigation.

[Anonymous]

Kavanaugh obtained the highest security clearance as the staff secretary of president Bush. He must have passed full scope poly several times.

Bob Mueller's FBI investigated him 5 times. For that type of clearance, FBI had to be very thorough and interview his high school and college friends. I thought democrats trust Mueller's FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. It looks the Senate Committee is releasing accounts by anonymous sources that have proven to be false as a way of creating doubt about the accounts of the named women who have come forward. Desperation.

Pretty much. That’s tacky. And despicable, but the GOP is basically a group of cads.

Cads?! Not really the first name that come to mind.

I’ve used up all my stronger words. I’ve reset to 1912.

Those Dems are DASTARDLY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh obtained the highest security clearance as the staff secretary of president Bush. He must have passed full scope poly several times.

Bob Mueller's FBI investigated him 5 times. For that type of clearance, FBI had to be very thorough and interview his high school and college friends. I thought democrats trust Mueller's FBI.

They had concerns but w pushed him through

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. It looks the Senate Committee is releasing accounts by anonymous sources that have proven to be false as a way of creating doubt about the accounts of the named women who have come forward. Desperation.

Pretty much. That’s tacky. And despicable, but the GOP is basically a group of cads.

Cads?! Not really the first name that come to mind.

I’ve used up all my stronger words. I’ve reset to 1912.

Those Dems are DASTARDLY.

That’s 1878, tyvm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh obtained the highest security clearance as the staff secretary of president Bush. He must have passed full scope poly several times.

Bob Mueller's FBI investigated him 5 times. For that type of clearance, FBI had to be very thorough and interview his high school and college friends. I thought democrats trust Mueller's FBI.

They had concerns but w pushed him through

But for Bush's personal word...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh obtained the highest security clearance as the staff secretary of president Bush. He must have passed full scope poly several times.

Bob Mueller's FBI investigated him 5 times. For that type of clearance, FBI had to be very thorough and interview his high school and college friends. I thought democrats trust Mueller's FBI.

They had concerns but w pushed him through

His initial clearance to become a judge took something like 2 years and he only got awarded it because Bush really wanted him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

A) What does this have to do with her accusations?

B) For anyone who asks why women don't come forward with accusations, here's your reason: the accuser's life becomes subject to scrutiny.

As well it should. She apparently was nuts enough for an ex to file a restraining order against her.

I sense a pattern. When a woman makes an accusation, she's nuts. When a man makes an accusation, clearly the woman is in the wrong.

Let's just have the investigation and get it over with. This back and forth is going nowhere. If people want to get to the bottom of who is telling the truth, and let's face it, most Americans do care about this right now, we should have it out fully. Then move on. The Republicans are doing themselves no favors by just seeming as if they will do anything to get this guy seated, no matter what anyone says.

That's not what I think. I do think that when anyone is able to get a restraining order, then there's a very good chance that the other person is emotionally unstable.

Do you also think that when someone goes to great lengths to make a public disclosure of an assault, they might just maybe be telling the truth? Because I do .