Harris beating Trump in Iowa

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This might not translate to MI/WI/PA :

https://x.com/Redistrict/status/1853108021221904510

There are always going to be outlier polls even when they are well designed. Hers is one of them.

Her "outliers" have been right in the past.

Her outlier poll has a margin of error that still allows for Trump beating Harris in Iowa by more than 3 points.

Which would be a horrible result for Trump.

A win is a win. It doesn’t matter how much by.

[Anonymous]

Omg fingers crossed she wins and there is universal acceptance. Then the GOP is magically transformed to the party before it went off the rails with the tea party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This might not translate to MI/WI/PA :

https://x.com/Redistrict/status/1853108021221904510

There are always going to be outlier polls even when they are well designed. Hers is one of them.

Her "outliers" have been right in the past.

Her outlier poll has a margin of error that still allows for Trump beating Harris in Iowa by more than 3 points.

Which would be a horrible result for Trump.

A win is a win. It doesn’t matter how much by.

+1 every time

[Anonymous]

Iowa for Harris! You can do this Iowa.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep dreaming about Iowa you liberal fools.

Make sure you have you “safe spaces” set up on Wednesday so you can go there and cry together.

Trump has two problems in Iowa abortion and farmers.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This might not translate to MI/WI/PA :

https://x.com/Redistrict/status/1853108021221904510

There are always going to be outlier polls even when they are well designed. Hers is one of them.

Her "outliers" have been right in the past.

Her outlier poll has a margin of error that still allows for Trump beating Harris in Iowa by more than 3 points.

Which would be a horrible result for Trump.

A win is a win. It doesn’t matter how much by.

+1 every time

Do you people not understand what a close result in Iowa would likely mean about the electorate in the 7 swing states?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump’s red wall in the Midwest is secure even if he loses Iowa. He’s taking Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin, and Michigan, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he takes Minnesota.

People forget the large Muslim population in Minnesota, namely Somali are not happy with the trans takeover in public schools and the Gaza war. An odd marriage indeed but Trump is gaining in African American support and Muslim support in the Midwest and with Latinos in the Southwest and Jews in the Northeast

Analysis brought to you by DCUM rando…

[Anonymous]

Anybody else have insufferable people in their SM feeds thinking they are professinal pollsters with the only lead on what isgoing to happen?

Sweet Jesus there is a D bag I know from my Duke MBA days that has been spamming evryone's feed with 'in depth' analysis on what is going to happen.

No one asked you, tool. You are just another obnoxious eunuch for Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anybody else have insufferable people in their SM feeds thinking they are professinal pollsters with the only lead on what isgoing to happen?

Sweet Jesus there is a D bag I know from my Duke MBA days that has been spamming evryone's feed with 'in depth' analysis on what is going to happen.

No one asked you, tool. You are just another obnoxious eunuch for Harris.

So many insults in one post. So manly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This might not translate to MI/WI/PA :

https://x.com/Redistrict/status/1853108021221904510

There are always going to be outlier polls even when they are well designed. Hers is one of them.

Her "outliers" have been right in the past.

Her outlier poll has a margin of error that still allows for Trump beating Harris in Iowa by more than 3 points.

Which would be a horrible result for Trump.

A win is a win. It doesn’t matter how much by.

+1 every time

Do you people not understand what a close result in Iowa would likely mean about the electorate in the 7 swing states?

They do not understand. Imposible to do when you lack critical thinking skills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anybody else have insufferable people in their SM feeds thinking they are professinal pollsters with the only lead on what isgoing to happen?

Sweet Jesus there is a D bag I know from my Duke MBA days that has been spamming evryone's feed with 'in depth' analysis on what is going to happen.

No one asked you, tool. You are just another obnoxious eunuch for Harris.

There's been a bunch of MAGA ones here the last couple of weeks. They're not as noisy right now, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This might not translate to MI/WI/PA :

https://x.com/Redistrict/status/1853108021221904510

There are always going to be outlier polls even when they are well designed. Hers is one of them.

Her "outliers" have been right in the past.

Her outlier poll has a margin of error that still allows for Trump beating Harris in Iowa by more than 3 points.

Which would be a horrible result for Trump.

A win is a win. It doesn’t matter how much by.

+1 every time

Do you people not understand what a close result in Iowa would likely mean about the electorate in the 7 swing states?

Yeah they don’t get it even after crowing for years about winning all three blue wall states in 2016. Trends apply across state boundaries.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This might not translate to MI/WI/PA :

https://x.com/Redistrict/status/1853108021221904510

There are always going to be outlier polls even when they are well designed. Hers is one of them.

Her "outliers" have been right in the past.

Her outlier poll has a margin of error that still allows for Trump beating Harris in Iowa by more than 3 points.

Which would be a horrible result for Trump.

A win is a win. It doesn’t matter how much by.

+1 every time

Do you people not understand what a close result in Iowa would likely mean about the electorate in the 7 swing states?

I’ll let JMart explain it to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anybody else have insufferable people in their SM feeds thinking they are professinal pollsters with the only lead on what isgoing to happen?

Sweet Jesus there is a D bag I know from my Duke MBA days that has been spamming evryone's feed with 'in depth' analysis on what is going to happen.

No one asked you, tool. You are just another obnoxious eunuch for Harris.

There's been a bunch of MAGA ones here the last couple of weeks. They're not as noisy right now, though.

This is not a Social Media feed. Loosely, that refers to Insta, FB, X, etc.

This is a forum.