Harris beating Trump in Iowa

[Anonymous]

RBG ^^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

I would love to meet the people posting to this thread arguing that they absolutely certain that this singular poll was correct and that Harris would win Iowa. Do they just cognitively memory hole all of this and compartmentalize?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:haha, yes. they still haven't given up and now there is chat about AOC running for president in 2028. LOL

Which I don’t understand at all. Why is there talk of 2028? DCUM told us there WOULD NOT BE ANOTHER ELECTION if Trump won.

He won.

So why is DCUM now talking about 2028?


I can’t understand this. [/quote

Don't forget they said this about Virginia if Youngkin wins. All these people had better not vote in the primary or general next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

I would love to meet the people posting to this thread arguing that they absolutely certain that this singular poll was correct and that Harris would win Iowa. Do they just cognitively memory hole all of this and compartmentalize?

Yes. Social justice warriors just ignore past misjudgments and invent new causes that are foolish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole website is a liberal echo chamber.

You just keep telling yourself all is good. Harris will win.

Rest of the country does not feel that way.

Don’t be surprised when Trump wins Tuesday.

Bump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:haha, yes. they still haven't given up and now there is chat about AOC running for president in 2028. LOL

Not a fan of AOC's politics, but she did the hard job of knocking on doors in her district to gain name recognition. She was also smart enough to not fall for Amazon's siren song of creating tech jobs in her district. Amazon completely hoodwinked Arlington by promising jobs that would fill the vacant office buildings in Crystal City. Now plans are stalled and Arlington is another Bezos sucker --- like Kamala Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

I would love to meet the people posting to this thread arguing that they absolutely certain that this singular poll was correct and that Harris would win Iowa. Do they just cognitively memory hole all of this and compartmentalize?

It's just like the critic who didn't know anyone who voted for Nixon..If you've eliminated every Republican from your life, as many here proudly announce they have, you would have no idea what the real national emotions are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

It’s easy to grasp at straws in the face of desperation. (And I say this as someone who was hopeful about the poll.)

Please don’t be desperate. Just do what the rest of us are doing - live your life. Don’t get wrapped up in this stuff. There’s more to life than politics. Win, lose, whatever. Life goes on.


-a (reluctant) Trump voter

It’s not whatever. Many of us stand to be impacted personally by the election results (federal employees just as an example). Women already lost healthcare access because of the last Trump term SCOTUS picks. But go ahead and laugh at us. I hope you’re still laughing in 4 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

It’s easy to grasp at straws in the face of desperation. (And I say this as someone who was hopeful about the poll.)

Please don’t be desperate. Just do what the rest of us are doing - live your life. Don’t get wrapped up in this stuff. There’s more to life than politics. Win, lose, whatever. Life goes on.


-a (reluctant) Trump voter

It’s not whatever. Many of us stand to be impacted personally by the election results (federal employees just as an example). Women already lost healthcare access because of the last Trump term SCOTUS picks. But go ahead and laugh at us. I hope you’re still laughing in 4 years.

DP
No one guarantees you a lifetime federal government job, tax parasite. Fed civil workforce should be cut by a minimum of 50% to start with, then evaluate further cuts from there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

It’s easy to grasp at straws in the face of desperation. (And I say this as someone who was hopeful about the poll.)

Please don’t be desperate. Just do what the rest of us are doing - live your life. Don’t get wrapped up in this stuff. There’s more to life than politics. Win, lose, whatever. Life goes on.


-a (reluctant) Trump voter

It’s not whatever. Many of us stand to be impacted personally by the election results (federal employees just as an example). Women already lost healthcare access because of the last Trump term SCOTUS picks. But go ahead and laugh at us. I hope you’re still laughing in 4 years.

Did you empathize with those who lost their jobs for not taking the safe and effective?
People lose jobs every day. Only you feds seem to feel entitled to lifetime lucrative employment, preferably from home, regardless of performance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:haha, yes. they still haven't given up and now there is chat about AOC running for president in 2028. LOL

Not a fan of AOC's politics, but she did the hard job of knocking on doors in her district to gain name recognition. She was also smart enough to not fall for Amazon's siren song of creating tech jobs in her district. Amazon completely hoodwinked Arlington by promising jobs that would fill the vacant office buildings in Crystal City. Now plans are stalled and Arlington is another Bezos sucker --- like Kamala Harris.

She also screwed her district out of a lot of business and jobs. Do you care about campaigning or economic results?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

It’s easy to grasp at straws in the face of desperation. (And I say this as someone who was hopeful about the poll.)

Please don’t be desperate. Just do what the rest of us are doing - live your life. Don’t get wrapped up in this stuff. There’s more to life than politics. Win, lose, whatever. Life goes on.


-a (reluctant) Trump voter

It’s not whatever. Many of us stand to be impacted personally by the election results (federal employees just as an example). Women already lost healthcare access because of the last Trump term SCOTUS picks. But go ahead and laugh at us. I hope you’re still laughing in 4 years.

Correct. The right and left both have agendas. If you get your way, you'd take away all firearms. Your side weaponized the legal system against political opponents, like Soviet Russia.

We heard the true democrat agenda from Marc Andreessen on Joe Rogan. Glad you are not in power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:haha, yes. they still haven't given up and now there is chat about AOC running for president in 2028. LOL

Not a fan of AOC's politics, but she did the hard job of knocking on doors in her district to gain name recognition. She was also smart enough to not fall for Amazon's siren song of creating tech jobs in her district. Amazon completely hoodwinked Arlington by promising jobs that would fill the vacant office buildings in Crystal City. Now plans are stalled and Arlington is another Bezos sucker --- like Kamala Harris.

She also screwed her district out of a lot of business and jobs. Do you care about campaigning or economic results?

She saved the city and state of NY a lot of subsidies, because Amazon brought jobs to NY anyway, but she lost her district jobs and new investment. The story though is that she saved her district and hurt NYC. It’s all very odd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

I would love to meet the people posting to this thread arguing that they absolutely certain that this singular poll was correct and that Harris would win Iowa. Do they just cognitively memory hole all of this and compartmentalize?

Yes. Social justice warriors just ignore past misjudgments and invent new causes that are foolish.

It must take a special kind of person to just argue like crazy for something and then pretend it didn’t happen after.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.

So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.

And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.


I love this thread.

I would love to meet the people posting to this thread arguing that they absolutely certain that this singular poll was correct and that Harris would win Iowa. Do they just cognitively memory hole all of this and compartmentalize?

Yes. Social justice warriors just ignore past misjudgments and invent new causes that are foolish.

It must take a special kind of person to just argue like crazy for something and then pretend it didn’t happen after.

The next funny episode (already getting underway) will be when libs start yammering about blue waves in 2026 and 2028…. after spending the last two years telling us democracy will END and there will never be anymore elections if Trump wins.