Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love this thread. Absolutely love it.
So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here.
And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg.
I love this thread.
I would love to meet the people posting to this thread arguing that they absolutely certain that this singular poll was correct and that Harris would win Iowa. Do they just cognitively memory hole all of this and compartmentalize?
Yes. Social justice warriors just ignore past misjudgments and invent new causes that are foolish.
It must take a special kind of person to just argue like crazy for something and then pretend it didn’t happen after.
DP, but she had a pretty good track record and it would've suggested that there was systematic bias out there, not being picked up elsewhere. She was obviously very wrong. Predictions markets weren't. Some of us can admit when there are errors and be more skeptical of polls like this (and polling in general going forward) and look to prediction markets as a better barometer of potential outcomes. Happy now?
The next funny episode (already getting underway) will be when libs start yammering about blue waves in 2026 and 2028…. after spending the last two years telling us democracy will END and there will never be anymore elections if Trump wins.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}