This has nothing to do with usnwr, it has to do with the quality of the student body. Although Georgetown’s drop in the rankings reflect the same. Georgetown hasn’t been a popular choice for top students in a while. |
+1 PP maybe hyper-focused on one notorious conservative who went there, but hundreds of thousands of liberals went there too. (P.S. half of U.S. Catholics are Democrats). |
Why not? They fill their seats every year. They seem to be happy with how things are going. |
OK, but what do you actually know about the education at these schools compared to others? Or are you expecting to see them there because of the reputation they have for being there? |
A former Georgetown dean asserted, as to why they won't join the rat race and move to the common app to boost ratings: “we don’t succumb to the false gods.”
|
And the admission rate is not considered in the USNWR rankings, so there's that. |
Northeastern marketed itself to drive up it's rating by honestly and openly improving in the areas of rating criterions rather than cheating like other schools, Columbia, Berkeley, Emory, etc. |
|
Completely obvious HYPSM are the top 5. I assume cheating, if others crack into that top 5.
Ranked too high: Chicago at 6 (should be 9 to 11) Hopkins at 7 tie (should be 10 to 12) Northwestern at 10 tie (should be 12 to 14) Vanderbilt at 13 tie (should be 15 to 17) Wash U at 15 tie (should be 17 to 19) Ranked too low: Columbia at 18 (should be 10 to 12) Cornell at 17 (should be 14 to 16) My take: Princeton MIT Harvard, Stanford, Yale UPenn Caltech Duke Chicago Hopkins Columbia Dartmouth Brown Northwestern Cornell Rice, Vanderbilt WashU, Notre Dame Berkley |
Lowest acceptance rates is used. More applicants, more denied= lower admits. |
No. The real reason Georgetown doesn’t join the Common App is because they don’t want to encourage those with financial need. Relative to other well-ranked schools, Georgetown’s endowment is dinky, which impacts their ability to provide needs-blind admission. If they admit few with need, they can still tout their aid. Georgetown is not on any “best value” list. |
|
What’s the obsession with Georgetown’s ranking? Do posters really think it’s where it is because it doesn’t accept the Common App? That’s naive and simplistic.
Georgetown is where it is because its financial resources are paltry compared to the other top schools. Absolutely paltry. Notre Dame has nearly 10 times’ Georgetown’s endowment and is in one of the least expensive locations in the US. Georgetown also has entering classes that, while very strong, don’t compare to the top Ivies, Stanford, Chicago, Duke etc. Do you really think that Harvard would drop below Georgetown if it stopped accepting the Common App. MIT is self-selecting in that it doesn’t attract as many non-STEM applicants. Notre Dame is self-selecting in that it attracts fewer non-Catholics. Etc. If Georgetown thought that simply by welcoming the common application it would suddenly shoot to the highest echelon of the rankings it would do it tomorrow. |
No it is not. There is a ranking for "lowest acceptance rate" but they do NOT use it as part of the methodology to rank universities. Here is the ranking for acceptance. rate. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/lowest-acceptance-rate |
No...acceptance rates no even considered in the ranking. These are the factors considered: Graduation and retention rates Social Mobility Graduation Rate Performance Undergraduate Academic Reputation Faculty Resources Student Selectivity (SAT scores, etc.) Financial Resources per Student Average alumni giving rate Graduate indebtedness |
It's always 1985 on DCUM. |
| Acceptance rate was used before in USNWR ranking, and this was the root for things like ED. Though it is not used anymore in that ranking, it still has residual effect. When a school played this game and was able to raise and stay in the ranking for some years, it would affect evaluators' mind on its academic reputation, simply because it is ranked high. |