Queen Elizabeth II

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While interviewing a royal news reporter, they said it was significant that Harry did not fly in with the rest of the family and he was in London. There is still no visual he arrived yet.

Maybe he arrived in private?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Charles' children have to call him something different now? Treat him differently? (I mean in private)

Yes. He is The King now. Even to his kids.

But, what changes IN PRIVATE. Like if they used to call him father, do they call him your highness now? His grandkids. That seems so crazy.

It would be a breach of etiquette to address him as Highness as he is now His Majesty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While interviewing a royal news reporter, they said it was significant that Harry did not fly in with the rest of the family and he was in London. There is still no visual he arrived yet.

Slow down. Qe2 wasn’t even in the same country when her dad died. He will get there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While interviewing a royal news reporter, they said it was significant that Harry did not fly in with the rest of the family and he was in London. There is still no visual he arrived yet.

It is not that complicated IMO. The family already had a plan. Harry wasn't in the plan because he moved. So he had to fend for himself.

[Anonymous]

Are they going to update all the mailboxes? Or does that happen over time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While interviewing a royal news reporter, they said it was significant that Harry did not fly in with the rest of the family and he was in London. There is still no visual he arrived yet.

Maybe he arrived in private?

There's only one way in, through the front gate. There's no way that would have slipped by the stalker photogs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does Charles' children have to call him something different now? Treat him differently? (I mean in private)

They called the Queen Granny so I don't see why it would be different with their father. They will have to bow/curtsey they first time they see him each day. So will his siblings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While interviewing a royal news reporter, they said it was significant that Harry did not fly in with the rest of the family and he was in London. There is still no visual he arrived yet.

It is not that complicated IMO. The family already had a plan. Harry wasn't in the plan because he moved. So he had to fend for himself.

So you are saying he's not family?

[Anonymous]

... and he's in London not California.

[Anonymous]

I knew she has passed. Families don't gather like that if it's not death.
I hope Harry and his wife was there. But, that's up to him or should I say her.

[Anonymous]

BBC officially confirmed that it will be King Charles III.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Charles' children have to call him something different now? Treat him differently? (I mean in private)

They called the Queen Granny so I don't see why it would be different with their father. They will have to bow/curtsey they first time they see him each day. So will his siblings.

If he were my brother I'd call him, "King Chuck the dopey F". That seems right

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It feels like the last dignified person on earth has died.

I agree.

[Anonymous]

We get 12 more days of this.

[Anonymous]

10% inflation, a plummeting pound, and now this and a King Charles!! I thought he would abdicate and give it directly to William. At least the new PM seems a step up.