U.S. Diplomat with prior residencies in DMV found guilty of sexual assault and rape of 22 victims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does this look like the same guy? https://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/rev_summary.php?id=77485

Nevermind. Same middle initial different white dude living in DC.

[Anonymous]

Wow. Disgusting.

And the smug POS took pictures and recorded videos - that's what blows my mind the most. Without evidence, assaults would have been very hard to prove especially abroad but the a-hole kept his conquests documented.

Hope he dies in prison

[Anonymous]

The link calls him a U.S. government employee. I'd be surprised if he was an FSO. There are a lot of agencies at that embassy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The link calls him a U.S. government employee. I'd be surprised if he was an FSO. There are a lot of agencies at that embassy.

Here’s how DOJ busts an FSO:
https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/former-foreign-service-officer-sentenced-40-years-federal-prison-production-and

This guy was another agency...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The link calls him a U.S. government employee. I'd be surprised if he was an FSO. There are a lot of agencies at that embassy.

Pretty much every agency is there, it's one of the largest Embassies, top 3 for sure. Here's another one:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6197827/Diplomat-assaulted-woman-said-got-lot-punishment-nothing.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The link calls him a U.S. government employee. I'd be surprised if he was an FSO. There are a lot of agencies at that embassy.

Pretty much every agency is there, it's one of the largest Embassies, top 3 for sure. Here's another one:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6197827/Diplomat-assaulted-woman-said-got-lot-punishment-nothing.html

Right. DOJ usually names the agency when an employee is caught doing something illegal. My agency has been named many times over the years when our employees are caught, usually due to stealing sensitive data and trying to personally profit off it.

But this indictment cryptically calls him a “US government employee.” There’s pretty much only one Agency this could be...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Read between the lines in the affidavit. He wasn’t a State employee.

And this is one reason of many that polygraphs are good for nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Read between the lines in the affidavit. He wasn’t a State employee.

And this is one reason of many that polygraphs are good for nothing.

True psychopaths who show no remorse for anything they do can easily pass polygraphs over and over again.

[Anonymous]

references to taking polygraphs in the court records, a protective order earlier this year, and a biography of Allen Dulles on his bookshelves. If that all doesn't scream CIA I don't know what does

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:references to taking polygraphs in the court records, a protective order earlier this year, and a biography of Allen Dulles on his bookshelves. If that all doesn't scream CIA I don't know what does

This blog connects all the dots and points out the inconsistencies in the government's filings regarding his status as a "diplomat":

-Employed by USG for 23 years.....his age is not revealed in the documents. Weird.
-10 polygraphs over that time
-Has visited over 60 countries via work and personal travel
-Lived in 6 or 7 countries
-Evidence is classified for nat-sec reason and his lawyers must review evidence in a SCIF

https://diplopundit.net/2021/03/12/usa-v-raymond-court-issues-protective-order-pertaining-to-classified-information/

https://diplopundit.net/2020/10/28/ex-usg-employee-brian-jeffrey-raymond-called-an-experienced-sexual-predator-ordered-removed-to-d-c/

Full suite of documents on his case, which was sealed from the very beginning:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18567455/united-states-v-raymond/


It's absolutely insane that this guy got away with this, likely for decades. And even worse he was being shuttled from country to country by his job.

[Anonymous]

Also, they are still searching for more victims. There are women in his digital files who have not been identified. Many are likely foreigners in overseas locations who may be difficult to contact.

[Anonymous]

He sounds like a legit psychopath. This description of his family is so sad and broken:




This is a really tough read, trigger warning:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20399976-brian-jeffrey-raymond-detention-memo

Basic gist of the government's argument: he's been escalating his crimes over a decade and they are concerned he will do something even more serious. They pulled his search history from 2010-2011 and he was already Googling how to drug women. The severity of the crimes against his victims became more severe and physical and his victim count increased. He also documented more and more of his crimes has he continued them.

What I also learned from this - the IC doesn't really keep tabs on the activities of their agents once they are already in the 'system.'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, they are still searching for more victims. There are women in his digital files who have not been identified. Many are likely foreigners in overseas locations who may be difficult to contact.

Jesus, just read the detention memo. Could some of these women be dead?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Read between the lines in the affidavit. He wasn’t a State employee.

And this is one reason of many that polygraphs are good for nothing.

True psychopaths who show no remorse for anything they do can easily pass polygraphs over and over again.

Yeah, I've always wondered about how they do these security screenings. I had a grad school friend who was an a talented student of math with a dream to work for the CIA or FBI. She was rejected at the early stages of the interview process. She is completely clean living and reliable and a nice person. I wonder what they screen for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The link calls him a U.S. government employee. I'd be surprised if he was an FSO. There are a lot of agencies at that embassy.

Pretty much every agency is there, it's one of the largest Embassies, top 3 for sure. Here's another one:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6197827/Diplomat-assaulted-woman-said-got-lot-punishment-nothing.html

Could this be the same guy as the one who was just indicted?