I tried that initially with DS but he was missing a lot from texts because none of the emojis come through. He found it really frustrating. We switched to a cheap Android smartphone and really locked down the internet/app stuff via a parental control app. |
|
Yes today, middle schoolers have phones. It's not the 1950s. My son had a flip phone until high school, then got a smartphone. Not sure why the raging fear of phones. Your kids all have computes, don't they? |
|
It is really up to you, but I’d generally say yes. Mine all got one in 5th- once they started getting dropped off a lot at activities. I found it extremely handy for them to be able to call me directly and:or for me to contact them directly in the event of a rain out, me running late etc etc rather than having to communicate through coaches etc. We had a couple of annoying incidents around that age before my kids had phones (lightning at baseball practice so it was called off- coach only texted DH who was out of town and didn’t see the text- turned into a fiasco...and a time with DD when I was late due to a traffic accident blockage and she was very upset etc)
As for social interaction, yes, by 6th grade kids mostly communicate via text etc. directly rather than going through parents. Kids who can’t do that do tend to be left out. An appleID and ipad would be fine for communicating- but I figured if I was going to allow that I might as well just get them a phone so that I can communicate with them etc. My 6th grader has an old iPhone with strict parental controls and no access to the internet browser btw. She uses it to text her friends and take photos. She has some apps but I need to approve anything before it is downloaded (parental controls) and also has time limits. |
Agree. But like a PP said, you don't have to allow unlimited internet or app usage on a smartphone. You can control this and institute downtime hours via the parental control settings (for an appleID set up for an under 13 year old). It's user friendly and those lockdown features have worked well for us. |
No. |
So no iPad, no Kindle for your middle schooler? |
| The fear is that it won't take long for a kid to want to do nothing but stare at their phones |
+1 We also don't have a home phone, so if they are home alone, they need a phone. They got an android initially, but everyone else had an iphone. Apparently, the imessage group chats don't really work with android phones. My DC was left out of a lot of the group chats. It was a huge group chat. DC saved up and bought an iphone, and DC's social life expanded. It sucks because as a PP stated, we do fight a lot about phones, but we have a rule where all devices are cut off from data at x time, and for the MSer, the device is left downstairs. We do what we can to make sure they are not on the phone 24/7. |
|
I look back now that my kid is in high school ...
I should have just started with the iphone and monitored apps that were downloaded. As others have said, yes, kids plan their social lives and school work through texting and other messaging. The kids without them were left out of the loop. And please don't do the "well all the adults will have a phone so my kid doesn't need one." I really hated letting kids use my phone and my kid hated asking other adults. |
I doubt it will be another 2 years before it's mentioned. |
| You never know. I don't think it's fair to say, Every kid is different, not all kids will be interested in phones and social media. |
You can physically take it and only hand it over for certain periods of time. I find that to be the best parental control time limit. |
| It is easy to control, but I still the fear is there. Also, the fear that they'll miss out if they don't have it. |
No |
We’ve taken a very similar approach. Got each of our kids iPhones the summer before 6th grade. They’re in 9th and 7th now, and the rules remain, for all of us (no phones in bedrooms overnight, no phones at dinner table or while watching TV/movies as a family, etc.). I’d also agree with the 90% stat for 6th graders with phones. |