compare rankings of unis vs LACs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Emory is a good school, but is it really all that impressive? Its high ranking is more due to Coca Cola fortune and endowment than academics or academic reputation.

Middlebury is one of the best SLACs in the country.

Emory is much better than Middlebury, a true shmuck would send their child to Miss if they also got into Emory.

With that said to answer OP's question the top 10 LAC's would be equal to the top 30 Unis. The times/wsj ranking combines both unis and lacs into the same ranking and Williams and Amherst are just outside the top 20.

All that is wrong. Though grads from both schools probably know how to spell "schmuck."

It's not wrong there's a reputable ranking that combine both unis and Williams and Amherst are right outside the top 20. Maybe 50 years ago Middlebury was better but today not a chance, most teens would choose Emory.

I think the reverse actually. Most kids today would choose Middlebury or Tifts over Emory. There is not a lot of buzz around Emory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Emory is a good school, but is it really all that impressive? Its high ranking is more due to Coca Cola fortune and endowment than academics or academic reputation.

Middlebury is one of the best SLACs in the country.

Emory is much better than Middlebury, a true shmuck would send their child to Miss if they also got into Emory.

With that said to answer OP's question the top 10 LAC's would be equal to the top 30 Unis. The times/wsj ranking combines both unis and lacs into the same ranking and Williams and Amherst are just outside the top 20.

All that is wrong. Though grads from both schools probably know how to spell "schmuck."

It's not wrong there's a reputable ranking that combine both unis and Williams and Amherst are right outside the top 20. Maybe 50 years ago Middlebury was better but today not a chance, most teens would choose Emory.

I think the reverse actually. Most kids today would choose Middlebury or Tifts over Emory. There is not a lot of buzz around Emory.

There's no possible way you honestly believe this. What's "buzzing" about Middlebury? College students do not want to live in Vermont for 4 years anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Emory is a good school, but is it really all that impressive? Its high ranking is more due to Coca Cola fortune and endowment than academics or academic reputation.

Middlebury is one of the best SLACs in the country.

Emory is much better than Middlebury, a true shmuck would send their child to Miss if they also got into Emory.

With that said to answer OP's question the top 10 LAC's would be equal to the top 30 Unis. The times/wsj ranking combines both unis and lacs into the same ranking and Williams and Amherst are just outside the top 20.

All that is wrong. Though grads from both schools probably know how to spell "schmuck."

It's not wrong there's a reputable ranking that combine both unis and Williams and Amherst are right outside the top 20. Maybe 50 years ago Middlebury was better but today not a chance, most teens would choose Emory.

I think the reverse actually. Most kids today would choose Middlebury or Tifts over Emory. There is not a lot of buzz around Emory.

There's no possible way you honestly believe this. What's "buzzing" about Middlebury? College students do not want to live in Vermont for 4 years anymore.

DP Literally the dumbest post I’ve read on a site absolutely replete with stupidity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Emory is a good school, but is it really all that impressive? Its high ranking is more due to Coca Cola fortune and endowment than academics or academic reputation.

Middlebury is one of the best SLACs in the country.

Emory is much better than Middlebury, a true shmuck would send their child to Miss if they also got into Emory.

With that said to answer OP's question the top 10 LAC's would be equal to the top 30 Unis. The times/wsj ranking combines both unis and lacs into the same ranking and Williams and Amherst are just outside the top 20.

All that is wrong. Though grads from both schools probably know how to spell "schmuck."

It's not wrong there's a reputable ranking that combine both unis and Williams and Amherst are right outside the top 20. Maybe 50 years ago Middlebury was better but today not a chance, most teens would choose Emory.

I think the reverse actually. Most kids today would choose Middlebury or Tifts over Emory. There is not a lot of buzz around Emory.

There's no possible way you honestly believe this. What's "buzzing" about Middlebury? College students do not want to live in Vermont for 4 years anymore.

Just know what schools current seniors in private applying to and Emory isn’t popular. You’d have to ask the kids why they are still interested in NE SLACs

[Anonymous]

Here are some numbers that presumably reveal something about a school's current popularity. These are stats for the schools recently mentioned in this thread. BTW, all these schools became test-optional this year.

Applications were up 30% at Middlebury this year,

https://middleburycampus.com/53708/news/applications-up-30-to-nearly-12000-in-historic-surge/

35% at Tufts

https://now.tufts.edu/articles/tufts-undergraduate-applications-rise-35-percent

Emory seems to have only released information on ED 1 and 2 applications, which were up 10%,

https://emorywheel.com/early-decision-ii-applicant-pool-grows-in-wake-of-test-optional-policy/

A reasonable conjecture is that Emory has not broadcast the rise in total applications because it isn't as impressive a number as for other schools.

[Anonymous]

the idea that emory is better than middlebury is laughable. even more laughable is the idea that it would attract the same kind of student. midd is an elite school; top 10 SLAC in the country. Emory is ranked 21 on university list. however, none of that matters because a kid who is going to desire to go to midd is not going to want to go to emory and vice versa. they will attract a different kind of student; urban/rural; medium/small; greek life/no greek life; more pre-professional/true SLAC focused on languages and environmental studies. this is why the comparisons are just plain stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no possible way you honestly believe this. What's "buzzing" about Middlebury? College students do not want to live in Vermont for 4 years anymore.

DP Literally the dumbest post I’ve read on a site absolutely replete with stupidity.

Agreed +100. With a 15.4% acceptance rate PP is saying "Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Emory is a good school, but is it really all that impressive? Its high ranking is more due to Coca Cola fortune and endowment than academics or academic reputation.

Middlebury is one of the best SLACs in the country.

Emory is much better than Middlebury, a true shmuck would send their child to Miss if they also got into Emory.

With that said to answer OP's question the top 10 LAC's would be equal to the top 30 Unis. The times/wsj ranking combines both unis and lacs into the same ranking and Williams and Amherst are just outside the top 20.

All that is wrong. Though grads from both schools probably know how to spell "schmuck."

It's not wrong there's a reputable ranking that combine both unis and Williams and Amherst are right outside the top 20. Maybe 50 years ago Middlebury was better but today not a chance, most teens would choose Emory.

I think the reverse actually. Most kids today would choose Middlebury or Tifts over Emory. There is not a lot of buzz around Emory.

They would choose Middlebury if they want to be on a campus that has a small strip of restaurants and stores, and nothing else around until you get to Burlington, Lake George, Albany or Boston. Nothing wrong with that, it is what it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the idea that emory is better than middlebury is laughable. even more laughable is the idea that it would attract the same kind of student. midd is an elite school; top 10 SLAC in the country. Emory is ranked 21 on university list. however, none of that matters because a kid who is going to desire to go to midd is not going to want to go to emory and vice versa. they will attract a different kind of student; urban/rural; medium/small; greek life/no greek life; more pre-professional/true SLAC focused on languages and environmental studies. this is why the comparisons are just plain stupid.

https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Middlebury+College&with=Emory+University

You overrating Middlebury to the heavens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the idea that emory is better than middlebury is laughable. even more laughable is the idea that it would attract the same kind of student. midd is an elite school; top 10 SLAC in the country. Emory is ranked 21 on university list. however, none of that matters because a kid who is going to desire to go to midd is not going to want to go to emory and vice versa. they will attract a different kind of student; urban/rural; medium/small; greek life/no greek life; more pre-professional/true SLAC focused on languages and environmental studies. this is why the comparisons are just plain stupid.

Also the top 10 LACs arent the same caliber as the top 20 unis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WSJ lumps all types of schools together for their rankings

Because it’s easier to do and they just want to sell subscriptions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the idea that emory is better than middlebury is laughable. even more laughable is the idea that it would attract the same kind of student. midd is an elite school; top 10 SLAC in the country. Emory is ranked 21 on university list. however, none of that matters because a kid who is going to desire to go to midd is not going to want to go to emory and vice versa. they will attract a different kind of student; urban/rural; medium/small; greek life/no greek life; more pre-professional/true SLAC focused on languages and environmental studies. this is why the comparisons are just plain stupid.

Also the top 10 LACs arent the same caliber as the top 20 unis.

I would have thought it was obvious that this would depend on the evaluative criteria.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the idea that emory is better than middlebury is laughable. even more laughable is the idea that it would attract the same kind of student. midd is an elite school; top 10 SLAC in the country. Emory is ranked 21 on university list. however, none of that matters because a kid who is going to desire to go to midd is not going to want to go to emory and vice versa. they will attract a different kind of student; urban/rural; medium/small; greek life/no greek life; more pre-professional/true SLAC focused on languages and environmental studies. this is why the comparisons are just plain stupid.

https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Middlebury+College&with=Emory+University

You overrating Middlebury to the heavens.

Only in DCUM world would someone try to make a point that Emory is better than Midd and post a link that shows them chosen 50-50.

[Anonymous]

The problem with ranking/lists is each list has its own criteria.


For example, I could design a custom list for my daughter, focused on affordability to her vs quality of the school. and flexibility. Guess what? What she wants will zoom into a state supported LAC in Virginia. W&M would probably come in first (no major declared freshman year). W&M is not the "best" college in the country, but it may be the best for her. (With my salary, aid is off the table at most schools.)

And that should be the focus, what is the right school for a specific student.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the idea that emory is better than middlebury is laughable. even more laughable is the idea that it would attract the same kind of student. midd is an elite school; top 10 SLAC in the country. Emory is ranked 21 on university list. however, none of that matters because a kid who is going to desire to go to midd is not going to want to go to emory and vice versa. they will attract a different kind of student; urban/rural; medium/small; greek life/no greek life; more pre-professional/true SLAC focused on languages and environmental studies. this is why the comparisons are just plain stupid.

https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Middlebury+College&with=Emory+University

You overrating Middlebury to the heavens.

Only in DCUM world would someone try to make a point that Emory is better than Midd and post a link that shows them chosen 50-50.

I'm not PP