My constitutional rights have been violated and I want to sue.

[Anonymous]

Some people in the United States of America are completely nuts Seriously. I am thankful the Canadian is shut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some people in the United States of America are completely nuts Seriously. I am thankful the Canadian is shut.

Edit: That the Canadian border is shut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I will happily take your money. I charge $550/hr.

For this loon you need to up your rate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You should call Williams & Connolly.

https://www.wc.com/Firm/Contact

I was going to recommend Jackie Chiles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will happily take your money. I charge $550/hr.

For this loon you need to up your rate.

Don’t worry I’m not a very good lawyer

[Anonymous]

-You can visit anyone who is willing to take the risks that will go along with visiting with you.
- What is it that you would like to buy that you cannot buy?
- Your rights do not extend to forcing others to risk their safety to stay open for you - but that could be an interesting, if expensive, lawsuit.
- How nice that you have money. I'm sure that there are many, including lawyers, who will be eager to assist you with parting from it.

LeViness and Tolzman. Someone is waiting to take your call.

This sounds very stressful. Perhaps a cruise?

[Anonymous]

OP, unfortunately the law is not on your side. In 1905 when facing the smallpox epidemic, a pastor in Massachusetts, Henning Jacobson refused to get a smallpox vaccine. The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court. And SCOTUS ruled:

Jacobson vs Massachusetts wrote:“Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members.”

And it allowed the state of Massachusetts to force Pastor Jacobson to have a smallpox vaccine in order to ensure the safety of the community from an epidemic. This is considered settled law and judicial precedent. Based on that, you could try to sue the state governments which are enforcing the stay-at-home orders, but no judge or court will take your suit seriously or contradict the SCOTUS ruling. You would have to appeal this ruling all the way to the Supreme Court and hope that the current sitting court decides that the precedent was wrong. It is pretty unlikely. It sounds like you would just be tossing a whole lot of money out the window to lawyers. If you plan to do that, why don't you just give me $100K. I've told you the same result you'll get and have saved you months/years of time.

[Anonymous]

OP, you don't sound all that bright, but I'm unsure as to how an attorney can help with that.

[Anonymous]

I must have been sick the day they talked about forcing stores to stay open in law school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How the fck is this stupid thread still up?

Amusement factor.

[Anonymous]

Better Call Saul

[Anonymous]

Ya know ppl could be out protesting the EPA regulations being rolled back, or for better work safety, or for higher min wage but they are out protesting their roles as consumers. Blows my mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Funerals are being limited to certain number of people, people are being stopped from having weddings, people are being forced to stay in cars, schools are being canceled.

Not everywhere unfortunately

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You should call Williams & Connolly.

https://www.wc.com/Firm/Contact

I was going to recommend Jackie Chiles.

It’s lewd, lascivious, salacious, outrageous!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP, unfortunately the law is not on your side. In 1905 when facing the smallpox epidemic, a pastor in Massachusetts, Henning Jacobson refused to get a smallpox vaccine. The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court. And SCOTUS ruled:

Jacobson vs Massachusetts wrote:“Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members.”

And it allowed the state of Massachusetts to force Pastor Jacobson to have a smallpox vaccine in order to ensure the safety of the community from an epidemic. This is considered settled law and judicial precedent. Based on that, you could try to sue the state governments which are enforcing the stay-at-home orders, but no judge or court will take your suit seriously or contradict the SCOTUS ruling. You would have to appeal this ruling all the way to the Supreme Court and hope that the current sitting court decides that the precedent was wrong. It is pretty unlikely. It sounds like you would just be tossing a whole lot of money out the window to lawyers. If you plan to do that, why don't you just give me $100K. I've told you the same result you'll get and have saved you months/years of time.

But, but... it’s the mark of the Beast!!