It’s more the tone of the post and the lack of caring or concern about anyone else but herself which makes her sound like a social path. There’s also a meanness to her posts which further support the idea of a social path. |
No we don’t know what it is like to have social media in our faces constantly and kids texting group texts constantly. Thankfully my kids are happy socially and doing well (right now as I am aware it can change) but we also encourage them not to post lots of pics of large group events. |
Um, every sane person thinks like this. This is the most level-headed, non-neurotic or vitriolic post in this whole thread. |
Well I read it differently I guess. Her point is that the other parents are probably just "normal" not sociopathic. They're concerned about their own shit - their jobs, their houses, their spouses, their hobbies, their families, etc. etc. Leaving your kid out is not a deliberate action on their part. They're not being mean to you. They're not thinking about you at all. And with all that we have going on in modern life, that is normal and should be seen as OK! I agree that it is very entitled to expect other people to be thinking about YOU and your concerns all the time. As in the ToTing example. |
|
It's simple. People talk about the effects of social media on kids, and it is significant, but the answer to the OP's post is really about the effects of social media and access to things like DCUM on the internet on PARENTS. I'll bet our parents thought about these things sometimes, but they had no outlet to talk about them unless they cared enough to seek out a friend or relative and have a conversation. Now you can hop on the internet and vent to strangers while you are still in the heat of the moment.
The world would be a better place if people didn't post online when they are having a bad moment. Write it down and get it out of you but then...delete it. Or wait to post until you think about it a bit. Keep a journal or something. |
| When I grew up in the age of dinosaurs, there were the kids — mean kids, rich kids, exclusive kids, team kids that all hung together but after school belonged to me. I didn’t have the option to know what they were up to by social media. It seemed a bit easier. |
+ 1 |
I think posting is a good thing. You get it off your chest and don’t bother your friends with it. Also many perspectives. No one is forcing you to click on these threads. |
\ You see, you equate it to being mean. That's far from the truth for us. I am thrilled that my kid has LOTS of friends in different groups. She may go the mall one day with soccer friends (only) and then the next day to Fields of Fear with her old elementary school/neighborhood friends and the following day to a movie with her swim friends. If you were a kid my daughter knew from chorus, you would interpret this as by kid being mean and leaving her out. No, it just means that she is spending her time with this or that group. It results in her seeing some friends frequently and others less frequently. It also results in her rarely being about to get together with someone if she wanted to because there are so many to pick from. If your circle is small, your invitations are small. It does not reflect on my kid or yours. It's just a choice on how big your circle of friends is... |
+1 Someone is not a sociopath for not including everyone 100% of the time. That is just a bizarre way of thinking. |
This exactly. (And the bolded responder is crazy. The only thing I can think of is that she hosts birthday parties at home for the very young and invites all, siblings included. That's not the way it is for older kids. Example: if we wanted to take a group of kids out to dinner, we couldn't even fit everyone in our car. The kids couldn't fit in one table, which is what they want. |
bolding... |
Social path is not a word. A sociopath is someone who is antisocial. These kids aren't antisocial, but instead they are selecting who to socialize with. Do you invite everyone to everything? It's absurd. |
I'm just answering the OP's query, so don't start with the "don't click on the threads" stuff. I didn't say don't post ever. I said don't post when you are all amped up with anxiety or anger. Posting questions on here can be helpful, because of the different perspectives you mention. Posting when you are emotional will probably lead to a bunch of demoralizing responses from the DCUM-hive which aren't helpful to an OP who is already upset. |
This. The PP is right. OP, I'm older (kid in college) and while I agree with you that some DCUM posters seem to go too far in wringing their hands over specific invitations sometimes...there are also other interactions and more serious exclusions that today can turn far more damaging than back in the day when spats or BFF dramas could just die out over a comparatively short time, or manipulative teens/tweens would just move on to another thing. Now, social media can keep drama alive, spread it to a nearly school-wide circle of kids, and amplify its effects greatly. Parents need to be aware of this and not dismiss it. |