| Good christ. Reading threads like this where people bring their intellect and share some illuminating and valid points just leaves my head spinning with "religion is so awful". Why can't we just enlighten ourselves already and give it up? It's so strange to have an intellectual argument about religion, politics, and feminism over what is essentially an ancient superstition and method to control the population. |
|
I notice that the hijab defenders always say its choice, and that choice should be respected. Some do acknowledge is not a choice in some countries.
But I have yet to find an Islamist site that says wearing the hijab is a woman's choice. Rather, they pretty much all say that it is a requirement for Mulsim women women set down in the Quran, using the same verses that the authors of the article have deconstructed. The message of these sites is clear: if you are a Muslim woman, you must wear a hijab. These are the sites that Muslims of good faith go to for guidance, and this is what they are reading about what they must do. Many do not realize that most of these sites are sponsored by people who wish to spread an extreme form of Islam. So I do not blame women who rely on these sites for coming to the conclusion they must wear a headscarf. Others are fully aware of the hidden agenda like Tashfeen Malik and are totally committed to the extremism and the underlying political reasons for which it is pushed. So we have hijab wearers who are sincere in their faith, but often misinformed by those pushing an agenda they are unaware of; women wearing the scarf as a show of identity with a particular group but who may not otherwise be particularly religious; women covering themselves because their families or husbands or the laws of the country in which they live require them to do so, and those who wear the hijab and possibly the niqab as an outward sign of their commitment to a political Islam, often of a supremacist form. Not all of the reasons involve a woman's choice, and some of these reasons are incompatible with American values. |
Are you kidding me? ? Asra Nomani is a known quack in the Muslim world. Islamic scholars and even religious scholars would chuckle at her articles and amusingly but politely say, "Bless her heart." Why does Wapo keep publishing her? The vast majority of Muslims laugh at her. |
A Muslim woman speaking her mind is not acceptable, is it? |
BAM!!! |
Sure it is. The Muslim world just knows she hasn't got one. |
Please watch this and educate yourself. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2cthl0_reza-aslan-defends-islam-and-slams-biased-reporting-on-cnn_people |
| Asra has a degree in communications and journalism. She can opine all she wants on religious topics, but Muslims know she doesn't speak as an authority. There are plenty of religious scholars out there, Muslims and nonMuslims, who Muslims can rely on. Asra is no scholar on anything Islamic. |
The authors were not writing for a Muslim audience but for a non-Muslim audience, whom certain parts of the Islamic community are trying to convince that the hijab is required by their religion. Why aren't these so-called scholars focusing instead on something positive and truly Islamic like the duty to help the poor through zakat? Unlike the hijab, the zakat is actually a pillar of Islam. |
because most are bullied into wearing them |
Writing through one lens is biased and it's simply persuasive. True argument covers both sides and finds the flaws and strengths presented by both sides. Having said that, however, I fail to see how covering is religious, as it simply means that men have no control over their primitive drives. How can you defend the practice in this case? |
The Muslim world? So it's OK for you to generalize about the Muslim world but not the reverse? |
| As a Muslim woman who doesn't wear hijab, I found her article refreshing. I think it's good to hear different persoectives and for outsiders to see that Muslims are not some monolothic group that think the same. There is a diversity of views in th Islamic world. I have no issue with women who CHOOSE the hijab. But to me, a hijab is not representative of the Islamic world. In fact, no one in my very large extended family or among my Muslim friends and aquaintances covers. This may no be representative of others but this is my experience. |
How is that a "BAM?" It's just another PC way to support the extreme view. And it's not a very smart move, IMO, as the PP brings ups "cleavage and bum shorts" as the exact opposite of Muslim covering. lol this -
versus this -
|
The notion that Islam is so arcane it can only be understood and practiced correctly with the guidance of scholars is laughable. The Quran itself says its meaning is clear. And the message was sent to a people who were largely nomadic and illiterate and had no scholars amongst their midst. What is clear is that there is a simple creed ("There is no god but God, and Muhammed is the prophet of God") and four other clear pillars of religious practice. Most of the rest is angels dancing on the head of a pin, no matter what "scholar" Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (who has a PhD in Islamic theology--love to see that dissertation) or his ilk says. It is regrettable that so many of these "scholars" spend their time counting angels and disseminating their views that the real scholars have to spend time refuting their spurious views of Islamic belief and practice instead of studying larger theological questions like the role of free will in Islam. |