| OP, ignore the food police. Soccer season will be starting soon so in a few weeks they will have real issues to direct their angst and judgement towards. They are just warming up on you. |
Right, processed packed sugared cookies are better than muffins
|
+1 It's not your job to police the eating habits of others. |
Here's a fabulous response to the Bon Appetit suggestions: http://momswhohatepinterest.me/4267528-13093421 |
Even though you usually eat a half box of oreos in one sitting, a kindergartner won't. Most moms will send in one or two cookies at that age. If you compare nutrition information, tue muffin is less healthy than two oreos. Of course if the kindergartner's mom is sending in your serving size then that is a different story... |
|
This happened to my 5th grader last year. They had a late lunch period so they were allowed to bring a snack that is eaten earlier in the day. Some kids retrieve their snacks from the cart where the lunches are stored and I'm pretty sure that is when the bag of SunChips was being taken from my DS's lunch. What helped was putting the good stuff on the bottom of the lunch bag and putting the sandwich on top of it. I don't think the thief had enough time to dig through the bag to get what he wanted.
For the record, we pretty much know who took the chips because it was easy to see who was eating and identical bag of SunChips at snack time but it's a hard accusation to make and would have caused more fuss than it was worth. I did let the teacher know that the chips were disappearing but once I rearranged the lunch bag, the problem went away. OP, ignore the food police above. Teachers do not police the contents of their students' lunches. Most certainly another student is helping his or her self. My suggestion is to find a lunch container that is more difficult and time consuming to get into. A pain for your child for sure, but she'll understand if it keeps her goodies safe. |
http://jezebel.com/colorado-mom-i-was-lunch-shamed-for-giving-my-daughter-1701192712 “Dear Parents, it is very important that all students have a nutritious lunch. This is a public school setting and all children are required to have a fruit, a vegetable and a heavy snack from home, along with a milk. If they have potatoes, the child will also need bread to go along with it. Lunchables, chips, fruit snacks, and peanut butter are not considered to be a healthy snack. This is a very important part of our program and we need everyone’s participation.” |
oreos contain very little nutritional value and are full of bad fat and corn syrup If you pick up bran muffins from the grocery store or better yet trader joes they are ok (high in whole grains, natural fruit sugar etc...) |
|
OP, stick a note to your daughter in the baggie with the cookies (one of those I love you notes).
If the cookies are gone and the note remains then you know it is the teacher. |
| Bran muffins..LOL |
Do kids need sweets in their lunches? Never occurred to me to include sweets and my kids don't have allergies. Do people wonder why this country is so fat? |
|
There is a zero percent chance that a teacher is stealing from the child's lunch. They do not eat lunch with the kids and they have no idea who is eating from what food group, nor do they care.
For the record, my kids and their friends eat a very similar lunch to what OP packs. It is far more important that they are not hungry during the day and that won't happen if most of the lunch winds up in the trash can. |
Natural fruit sugar is chemically the same and just as bad once taken out of the fruit. Why would a kid need desert at lunch? I'm not a crazy food mom but how odd. I'm not sure I've ever had desert at lunch. I certainly did not pack one for school as a kid. |
| News flash: If you pack your kid a low-fat low-carb lunch, they will be hungry enough to steal from their friends. |
| I'm finally getting a clue as to why some kids are raiding other people's lunches. Even the experts say it's fine to include a couple of cookies. |