And your point is? He has acknowledged without her, he would not have been able to do this. I think that is an important point of clarification. |
That's how business works, OP. If he wants to make an offer to pay her off he can, but that would be a HEFTY sum that I'd think would bother you too. He himself said she helped start it, so that should be a cue for you to butt out. Just repeat "business is business, not personal." This is not your issue, and for what it's worth I think it sounds fair. |
It's almost as if they vowed to be partners "from this day forward until death do us part." Oh, right, they did. |
| OP - Don't book that engagement party for anytime soon. |
sorry for the long run on sentence and yes, I know, ensure, not insure. |
And for the 100th time...they have children together. They will be glued together forever. Forever. And Ever. Get used to it. |
| Based on the details that OP offers (you served up an awful lot, sister) I think I know who this is. It would be so, so easy to forward a link.... |
How would you feel if he had had a "silent partner" who allowed him to move in with him and not charged for room or board for three or four years so he could get the business started, with the agreement that he would get 22% of the business? People make all kinds of agreements in the business world. There are different ways of helping a business to get started that add value to that business. |
|
OP this is pretty despicable. You look like a fool trying to come up with reasons why you're more worthy than Wife #1. It makes you sound insecure, greedy, unfair, and pathetic. Let it go. You weren't here when this happened.
If he'd made the same agreement with a stranger VC you'd have NO reason to make these arguments, and it really is the same deal except that you have some heightened emotions tied up in it, but it's not your arrangement to contest. |
I think you should. He deserves to know what a gold digger (and a relatively dim one at that) he's about to marry. |
If he was working so hard I bet she picked up a large bit of slack regarding child rearing, household chores etc. Good for him for acknowledging her sacrifice and not trying to cheat her out of marital assets. |
| So it looks like your fb is a good guy who recognizes how much help his ex wife have him and he doesn't begrudge her her share. You should be happy he is such a stand-up guy. |
NP here. I agree with the others that OP should quit while she's behind. Every post she makes makes her look worse and worse. OP--If you are, as one of your responses says, getting a prenuptial, I hope that your affianced has enough sense to include a prenup that says that the business is solely his premarital and that you aren't entitled to any of it in the event of a divorce. The point is that it's his business and money, and not yours. He can manage it anyway that he wants and based on any prior agreements that he has. Without her working to support him, he would self-admits that he would never have been able to afford to start up this business. As everyone should know, starting up a business is hard. The first few years are always a struggle to break even, let alone make a profit. The family has to live somewhere and eat while the business is in its formative years. She provided the family income to allow him the luxury of starting up a business with no profit margin. Without her blood, sweat and tears working another job, he would have had to provide for a family and would not have been able to start up a new business. So, yes, she is fully entitled to a portion of ownership of the business. It doesn't make you look very good showing how little you recognize that. The question is, why do you deserve any more of the proceeds of this business than she does? She at least supported him while he started off the business. You've done nothing to earn any benefit off of the fruits of the business.
Frankly, you aren't keeping her on any payroll. He is, by agreement. If he can't be trusted to keep his word to her over what they agreed on during their marriage how would you be able to trust that he would keep his word to you? He's either trustworthy or he isn't. |
+1 |
She's not on the payroll. She's an owner! Yea capitalism. And if her 22 per cent is 80 or 90 k yearly, does that mean your intended's share is somewhere north of 400K? Greedy greedy. And, yes, he is tied to her forever. That's what happens when you have kids with someone. |