I think my child will be offered an AAP spot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First year AART here. I am amazed at how many parents feel entitled meaning their kids "belong/ must be in AAP and their children have such a sense of entitlement. The rotten apples do not fall far from the diseased parental tree.

Are you saying the OP is a parent feeling entitled or one who has a more realistic viewpoint? Confused.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Very cute, but
but unchallenged = bored.

Don't agree at all.

who cares ....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Very cute, but
but unchallenged = bored.

Don't agree at all.

who cares ....

Let me guess: you're one of those parents who has discussed this with your kid so your kid reports he's bored?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Then either enrich at home or go to a private school and quit your entitled whining.

Look Projection up in the dictionary, you are the Entitled one thinking that the program should include non gifted kids.

Oh dear. Were you not aware that AAP is already made up of mostly non - gifted kids?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Then either enrich at home or go to a private school and quit your entitled whining.

Look Projection up in the dictionary, you are the Entitled one thinking that the program should include non gifted kids[u].

Oh dear. Were you not aware that AAP is already made up of mostly non - gifted kids?

What a bunch of ridiculousness. The committee lets in who the committee lets in. Do you have nothing better to do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Very cute, but
but unchallenged = bored.

Don't agree at all.

who cares ....

Let me guess: you're one of those parents who has discussed this with your kid so your kid reports he's bored?

Wrong again, this is according to the aap teacher... oh well....you can go back to projecting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Very cute, but
but unchallenged = bored.

Don't agree at all.

who cares ....

Let me guess: you're one of those parents who has discussed this with your kid so your kid reports he's bored?

Bull - no aap teacher told you your child was bored. Absolutely a lie.

Wrong again, this is according to the aap teacher... oh well....you can go back to projecting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Very cute, but
but unchallenged = bored.

Don't agree at all.

who cares ....

Let me guess: you're one of those parents who has discussed this with your kid so your kid reports he's bored?

Bull - no aap teacher told you your child was bored. Absolutely a lie.[u]

Wrong again, this is according to the aap teacher... oh well....you can go back to projecting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Very cute, but
but unchallenged = bored.

Don't agree at all.

who cares ....

Let me guess: you're one of those parents who has discussed this with your kid so your kid reports he's bored?

Bull - no aap teacher told you your child was bored. Absolutely a lie.[u]

Wrong again, this is according to the aap teacher... oh well....you can go back to projecting.

An omniscient and a projecter....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Very cute, but
but unchallenged = bored.

Don't agree at all.

who cares ....

Let me guess: you're one of those parents who has discussed this with your kid so your kid reports he's bored?

Bull - no aap teacher told you your child was bored. Absolutely a lie.[u]

Wrong again, this is according to the aap teacher... oh well....you can go back to projecting.

...and once is enough darling....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Then either enrich at home or go to a private school and quit your entitled whining.

Look Projection up in the dictionary, you are the Entitled one thinking that the program should include non gifted kids.

Oh dear. Were you not aware that AAP is already made up of mostly non - gifted kids?

What a bunch of ridiculousness. The committee lets in who the committee lets in. Do you have nothing better to do?

Huh? make better point with [u]your time... the committee lets in non gifted kids ...the program is watered down....your point is off topic and incredibly riduculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Then either enrich at home or go to a private school and quit your entitled whining.

Look Projection up in the dictionary, you are the Entitled one thinking that the program should include non gifted kids.

Oh dear. Were you not aware that AAP is already made up of mostly non - gifted kids?

What a bunch of ridiculousness. The committee lets in who the committee lets in. Do you have nothing better to do?

Huh? make better point with [u]your time... the committee lets in non gifted kids ...the program is watered down....your point is off topic and incredibly riduculous[b].

Actually it isn't off point at all. Are you suggesting that a "gifted" child (who is shown to be gifted by a WISC) belongs in the program more than a child who got in on appeal when both are getting good grades? Of course the committee lets in non gifted kids, as it is no longer "GT" but AAP. Additionally, unless you get a WISC to submit with your application, the committee has no clue who is gifted and who isn't. YOUR post is the ridiculous one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Then either enrich at home or go to a private school and quit your entitled whining.

Look Projection up in the dictionary, you are the Entitled one thinking that the program should include non gifted kids.

Oh dear. Were you not aware that AAP is already made up of mostly non - gifted kids?

What a bunch of ridiculousness. The committee lets in who the committee lets in. Do you have nothing better to do?

Huh? make better point with [u]your time... the committee lets in non gifted kids ...the program is watered down....your point is off topic and incredibly riduculous.

Actually it isn't off point at all. Are you suggesting that a "gifted" child (who is shown to be gifted by a WISC) belongs in the program more than a child who got in on appeal when both are getting good grades? Of course the committee lets in non gifted kids, as it is no longer "GT" but AAP. [b]Additionally, unless you get a WISC to submit with your application, the committee has no clue who is gifted and who isn't. [u] YOUR post is the ridiculous one.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Sure. Keep telling yourself that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a shame because my DD is bored in AAP...not challenging enough.

Only boring people get bored.

Sure. Keep telling yourself that.

Sure, keep telling yourself that isn't true.