Please identify what you consider to be waste at the scale where it could actually influence the Federal budget
Weren't you paying attention to School House Rock as a child? "We, the People, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare and, secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our prosperity do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America." Seems like "common defense" was only one of the things they had in mind.
Since I was born and have mostly lived in states that are net exporters of tax dollars, my home would benefit from a change where my tax money stopped going to the residents of states that keep taking it, but, since I actually consider us all to be Americans, and such transfers of wealth are part of the Federal government's role in promoting the general welfare, I believe it's a good thing. |
Planned Parenthood and other safe abortiom clinics require ultrasound for abortion |
Which number says income taxes must end? |
I disagree. Enough transferring of wealth from the federal government. Once they get their budget under control, I will reconsider my opinion about states "exporting tax dollars." |
This list demonstrates that the oft-repeated platitude of the PP ("The Tea Party is a good thing, but the liberals have painted them with a broad brush and made their issues social--when the Tea Party issues are fiscal." ) is just not true. More than half of the list is not "fiscal" (and 15 wraps in a whole host of separate issues that should be counted individually). Unless you blame the "liberal media" for what is on a TP organization's own website? Plus, I'm gonna need to see some support for # 6. What horseshit. |
| Try the Constitution re: #6. Lol |
Correct. This is almost too blatantly obvious and I'm puzzled as to why the Republican party hasn't been able to figure it out yet. Many, many people now identify as "fiscally conservative" but "socially liberal" - to speak in broad brush terms - and a candidate who acknowledges this fact would win by a landslide in now-purple Virginia. I usually vote Democrat but I would happily consider a Republican if a reasonable one were presented. I'm glad McAuliffe was able to pull this one out, but the entire campaign was a national joke and completely painful to witness. |
Are you communicating your feelings to your party leadership? |
Not because a politician said so. It's a medical issue and not one politicians should be dictating. |
| So back to the original question.... any Republicans on here who are going to try to "take back their party" and convince the leadership to get off social issues? |
This can't be overstated. So often, I want to say to the Tea Party and "states should do it" supporters, "OK, assholes, you got it. We'll give you what you want. Federal dollars going in cannot exceed federal taxes leaving." Texas would be OK, and probably a couple other red states. The rest would be completely fucked. This map is instructive. http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-union |
Where in the constitution does it say that the government must be downsized? In any event, #6 was a typo - I meant #9 "Bailout and stimulus plans are illegal." |
Are you referring to # 5? See the part of the Constitution that says WELL REGULATED MILITIA. |
They use those ultrasounds as part of the abortion procedure. They are done for the doctor and there is no requirement for the women to view the ultrasound, for them to make the heartbeat audible, or to wait 24 hours between ultrasound and abortion. The proposed legislation in VA and other states is not intended as a medical step, it's an attempt to make a woman feel guilty about undergoing a legal procedure by pressuring her to listen to the heartbeat and view the ultrasound. |
Okay, what would you cut out? What do you consider not essential to the American people? |