He doesn’t owe her a response, it would just be a nice thing to do, given how long they’d been together. |
+1, particularly since her message to him was kind. Three years is a long relationship, especially in your 40s. If they parted on cordial terms and their relationship wasn't drama-filled, her reaching out shouldn't have been seen as aggressive and a mature adult should be able to reply in a way that maintains the boundary while still being a human being. I think it's weird to date someone for that length of time, break up, and then expect them to disappear from your life forever or to think total silence is appropriate. Unless something happened in their relationship or with their breakup that OP is not sharing, this strikes me as odd. I would be able to be friendly with any ex if I heard from them or saw them now, even though I'm now married and have no interest in getting back with any of them. I'd at least be able to ask them how they were and wish them well. |
No, just no. Based on how she lashed out at him after not getting a response I would have done the same. He knows her better than you all. He doesn't want to engage with crazy and that's perfectly fine. Her massage wasn't nice. It's manipulation and scheming. She knows he is in a new relationship and completely disrespected that. She deserves nothing. |
Note that he isn’t responding to people on this thread either - which tells me that he is unresponsive in general, not only to that specific woman. |
You sound crazy. Yes he knows her best and he said her message was nice. He also didn't describe any negative behavior from her except the nasty message and the fact that she's clearly stalking his GF's public social media. These are concerning but on their own tell me she's upset about the breakup, not that she's crazy, manipulative, or scheming. I think it's strange OP didn't just send her a quick message to say he didn't want to get back together but wished her well. What happened between them that this didn't seem like an option to him? It's like bare minimum. |
Or he's a troll. Or he posted and then had to work and will check back in later. You like jumping to dramatic conclusions based on very little information. |
Yes, he did. The only reason you're saying all of this is because OP is a man. Be so for real. |
Nope. I'm a woman and I'm saying this specifically because when I was young and immature (like early 20s) I did ghost exes or had this idea that after we broke up I never wanted to see or hear from them again. Now I'm older and a recognize that was a weird, emotionally immature response. If you have an intimate relationship with someone, it should be normal that you can interact with them in the future. Not be friends (I've never stayed friends with exes) but be pleasant. If I was dating a guy who responded to his ex the way OP responded to his, I would wonder what went on in that relationship that there is so much drama and bad feelings like this. I don't think that's normal. |
Not responding WAS the boundary. |
or "he" is a creative troll. |
Newsflash, you don't owe anyone a lifetime of contact just because you were intimate with them at some point. This is not some 20 year old immature girl. This is a woman in her 40s who should not be reaching out to an ex who is in a new relationship, much less lashing out once she didn't get a response she wanted. Sounds like both of you have a lot more maturing to do. |
Exactly. But somehow men are not allowed to have those. If this were a woman, most of the responses would be calling her ex a stalker, etc. |
+10000. The lady upthread who bragged about chewing out someone she dated in 1998 should show you this is the expectation of a crazy person. |
OMG ! |
In general (not specific to this situation, which I think is complicated) I think being totally non-responsive is a weak way to set a boundary. I've done it, sometimes it's all you feel capable of, but I know from experience that it can be misinterpreted and create communication issues. Especially if the person you are dealing with is not thinking clearly. It's very easy for someone to tell themselves stories, convince themselves they are true, and then start taking action based on a fiction. Like for example, someone like this might convince themselves that the new GF is preventing OP from responding, that the new GF is controlling and cruel and that secretly OP wants to be free of her and return to his ex. Yes, a total fantasy. But also one facilitated by the silence. Whereas if you just respond and state clearly that you aren't interested, she still might invent a narrative but it's harder because she isn't working with total silence. Some people need to affirmatively be reminded of reality. Refusing to engage can feel safer in the short term because it avoids an awkward exchange, but in the long run if you can figure out how to communicate stuff like that firmly without engaging in drama, it's better. I know not everyone feels capable of that though. |