Another horrific chicago train attack by a serial violent offender, he set young woman on fire

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is because violent repeat offenders are not prosecuted and if they are it us too light of a sentence before they are released from jail.

There needs to be mandatory incarceration of mentally ill who are convicted or crimes it found not mentally competent.

Reed’s criminal record includes nearly 50 prior arrests since 2017, with past convictions for arson, aggravated battery, and assault.

THIS. All of it.

Throwing people in jail seems to have done a great job of preventing crime. /s

We have the highest number of incarcerated people in the world and yet still plenty of crime. Throwing people in jail is not working. Maybe fix the actual problems instead of throwing people away.

The prosecutors from this guy’s last case begged the judge to hold him in jail. She refused and let him out. If he had been in jail, that young woman would have gotten home from work that day. Instead, she’s in the ICU fighting for her life and has burns over 60% of her body. That is not okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is because violent repeat offenders are not prosecuted and if they are it us too light of a sentence before they are released from jail.

There needs to be mandatory incarceration of mentally ill who are convicted or crimes it found not mentally competent.

Reed’s criminal record includes nearly 50 prior arrests since 2017, with past convictions for arson, aggravated battery, and assault.

THIS. All of it.

Throwing people in jail seems to have done a great job of preventing crime. /s

We have the highest number of incarcerated people in the world and yet still plenty of crime. Throwing people in jail is not working. Maybe fix the actual problems instead of throwing people away.

The prosecutors from this guy’s last case begged the judge to hold him in jail. She refused and let him out. If he had been in jail, that young woman would have gotten home from work that day. Instead, she’s in the ICU fighting for her life and has burns over 60% of her body. That is not okay.

I agree. It's not okay. But WHY is this happening? WHY are men setting women on fire and stabbing them on trains?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

I think your comment is a disservice that doesn't solve any problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

I think your comment is a disservice that doesn't solve any problem.

So you're unable to answer the questions. Thank you for making it clear that you're just here to spew hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh look. Trump has a bad day and suddenly we get to hear another distracting story about a sCaAAary criminal.

A woman is set on fire and you make this about Trump. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For comparison’s sake, how many people did Trump kill by cutting off USAID food assistance?

Oh, you mean using USAID to fund color revolutions in foreign countries?

No, I mean the hundreds of thousands of deaths from cutting off food to starving people. I’m sorry the foreign actors feeding you garbage on X.com told you it was “color revolutions” or whatever nonsense you imagine. It was actually food. For children. Children who starved to death.

NP. This is a thread about grievous bodily harm inflicted on an American citizen by another American citizen in the United States. Why are you bringing up the theoretical impact of USAID cuts to noncitizens outside of the United States? Go post your grievances in another thread.

Because our "leaders" kill scores more people on a daily basis with their policies, but you are allowing yourself to be whipped into a frenzy over regrettable but isolated instances of violence while ignoring large scale violence committed by the people in charge.

The. U.S. is not responsible for feeding, heath and general welfare of the entire world. If people are dying in other countries, their governments are failing them, not the U.S.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Do you want these violent men as your neighbor?

The answer to recidivist violent men is prison. And all those who have experienced trauma from these men who were let go by progressives would agree.

The dead can't talk.

But go ahead. Open your home to these men. And then I'll pay attention to your opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is because violent repeat offenders are not prosecuted and if they are it us too light of a sentence before they are released from jail.

There needs to be mandatory incarceration of mentally ill who are convicted or crimes it found not mentally competent.

Reed’s criminal record includes nearly 50 prior arrests since 2017, with past convictions for arson, aggravated battery, and assault.

THIS. All of it.

Throwing people in jail seems to have done a great job of preventing crime. /s

We have the highest number of incarcerated people in the world and yet still plenty of crime. Throwing people in jail is not working. Maybe fix the actual problems instead of throwing people away.

The three strikes rule that was put in place in the late ‘90 lead to the lowest crime rates in decades. It needs to be implemented again and more prisons built.

And yes throwing people in prison for violent crimes should be the standard, not a last resort.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

Some people can’t be fixed. It’s a hard truth, and they should be separated from polite society after the first violent encounter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

Some people can’t be fixed. It’s a hard truth, and they should be separated from polite society after the first violent encounter.

Send them to Epstein Island

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is because violent repeat offenders are not prosecuted and if they are it us too light of a sentence before they are released from jail.

There needs to be mandatory incarceration of mentally ill who are convicted or crimes it found not mentally competent.

Reed’s criminal record includes nearly 50 prior arrests since 2017, with past convictions for arson, aggravated battery, and assault.

Same as in NYC. Once upon a time these people were locked up with little to no hope of ever getting out. They were a danger to society and the cities protected the law-abiding citizens first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Are we "throwing people in jail?"

What percentage of crimes that COULD be sentenced to jail time, actually ARE sentenced to the maximum time (as opposed to getting a lighter sentence, probation, plead out, etc.?)

[Anonymous]

If you commit a violent crime against any one you deserve a bullet in the head. Problem solved.