Why? And why are you ok with that? |
+1 Don't commingle those funds. |
|
Lol, OP is in her 20s and already planning on quitting her job and living off her surgeon husband’s $700,000 income for the next 60 years—but is very concerned that he not get access to any of her six-figure net worth!
On a totally unrelated note, I wonder why women are having such a hard time in the dating market and find that the men they would like to marry prefer instead to “pump and dump“ them. It’s a real mystery. |
You can customize the terms to adjust for future income. |
Yikes, you are an awful person. I hope you don’t have children to pass on these inferior genes. |
| Anyone arguing against prenups simply don’t understand the law. It’s smart for both sides. |
|
Prenup can protect your premarital worth which is significant. As a woman who wants to have kids and be primary parent eventually, yes I recommend you get a prenup. Have it protect your premarital assets and then everything after marriage is split equally.
|
|
OP here. Thanks for all the feedback. I saw a lot of sexist/misogynistic posts. To clarify, I'm the man in the relationship and SO is female.
Both of us understand that her income will be higher soon after she starts working and it makes sense to prioritize that. The assumptions I have made about stepping down at work, etc. are only if I have to.. i.e. No kids, nothing happens. If I can work remote or her job is at a location where my company operates, I transfer, etc. If we do have kids, I will absolutely step down to a very high WLB job to prioritize kids. We have seen how a few other families with two high-income/high-stress jobs operate and that's not for us. My intention with the pre-nup was to be able to control my funds should things go wrong in the medium-term, not necessarily corral those funds as 'mine' forever. Any income we make during our marriage would be shared 50/50 regardless of who makes it. 10-15 years down the road, I expect out marital assets to more than exceed my personal assets at which point I have no issues co-mingling everything. |
Why are you assuming mothers would be the primary parent? I didn’t mention gender. You’re a bit misogynistic, no? |
You don’t need a prenup to accomplish this. How the premarital assets are subsequently titled, and whether they are commingled, does this work. What you are describing wanting to do is the default condition when you maintain the assets separately from any marital asset. Ask a lawyer to confirm this for your location, ofc. |
This aged poorly |
Hi OP - I have two thoughts on your situation. 1) if you are thinking these thoughts about a pre-nup, you are not really in love with this woman and probably should not get married. I bet you will get divorced. 2). Your plan to "step back" from your career and take care of the kids sounds pretty dumb. Do you not have motivation to maximize your potential in life? I'm not very impressed with the way you have described yourself and your future. |
NP. I feel that everybody should have a pre-nup because it’s essentially forced financial counseling in advance of marriage and gets issues out that might remain hidden otherwise. This is a situation where you had better be very clear your expectations are aligned. |
Do this. Keep documentation and emails in all the career and monetary sacrifices you make for this potential spouse. Make sure the kids are well provided for via trusts or wills. And protected from future spouses’ kids or new kids. |
|
Most states you don’t split net worth pretty much marriage.
My buddy at 43 rich married a very hot 34 year old women, he had loft in Soho, Porsche, maxing out 401k since 21 and maybe two stocks. She was worth zero. In NY she is not entitled any assets pre marriage. She is entitle half his income while married and 1/2 appreciation gains on assets while married. Why would she sign a pre nup? He is not Tom Cruise, Jeff Bezos etc. Guess what that was 19 years ago, Porsche sold, soho loft sold, all money intermingled, they had three kids. She still does not work. You sound similar |