Reid email , protecting immigrants

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unauthorized immigrants are not supposed to be eligible for free meals under the school lunch program. (Wild, I know!) By law, FCPS requires parents to provide a social security number when they are applying for free meals for their child.

Many schools are under the “community” provision so parents do not need to submit an application.

Damn , this is gonna get good. Got emmm

[Anonymous]

She needs to stay in her lane. Harboring illegals isn’t in her job description.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This email painted a target on our school system.

Dumb
Dumb
DUMB!!!

How so? The school system is huge and Fairfax County is already a well known sanctuary jurisdiction. How does this add a target on FCPS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm ready to turn in their entire dei department as I see it as a waste of my tax dollars, I am also eager to rid the school of all the undocumented taking resources away from my children.

Why do you kids need so many resources? Mine are getting As in AAP classes and doing great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unauthorized immigrants are not supposed to be eligible for free meals under the school lunch program. (Wild, I know!) By law, FCPS requires parents to provide a social security number when they are applying for free meals for their child.

Many schools are under the “community” provision so parents do not need to submit an application.

Damn , this is gonna get good. Got emmm

I just looked at the application and no, you can say you don’t have an SSN. Link to the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm ready to turn in their entire dei department as I see it as a waste of my tax dollars, I am also eager to rid the school of all the undocumented taking resources away from my children.

Why do you kids need so many resources? Mine are getting As in AAP classes and doing great.

Troll.

[Anonymous]

No one is going into schools to round up KIDS. This is some amazing hysteria, even for Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm ready to turn in their entire dei department as I see it as a waste of my tax dollars, I am also eager to rid the school of all the undocumented taking resources away from my children.

Why do you kids need so many resources? Mine are getting As in AAP classes and doing great.

Considering the pp doesn't have even a basic understanding of what DEI actuality is can you expect their kids to not need additional resources to keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does she feel the need to reassure everyone? People here illegally should be deported period.

You're so stupid. First of all, at the rate of 500 deportations a day, it would take us 60 years to deport the people already here, and that doesn't take into account all the people who will continue or overstay their visas.

Also, have you not noticed that no one is picking the for in California right now, in fear of raids? Do you not realize how much our economy depends on migrant labor?

Finally...she feels the need to reassure students because they have the constitutional right to a public education. Yep. The right to it, guaranteed by the 14th amendment. And anyone with half a brain knows that educating everyone is good for all of us. Unless you have an interest in a permanent disempowered underclass, as oligarchs do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she feel the need to reassure everyone? People here illegally should be deported period.

You're so stupid. First of all, at the rate of 500 deportations a day, it would take us 60 years to deport the people already here, and that doesn't take into account all the people who will continue or overstay their visas.

Also, have you not noticed that no one is picking the for in California right now, in fear of raids? Do you not realize how much our economy depends on migrant labor?

Finally...she feels the need to reassure students because they have the constitutional right to a public education. Yep. The right to it, guaranteed by the 14th amendment. And anyone with half a brain knows that educating everyone is good for all of us. Unless you have an interest in a permanent disempowered underclass, as oligarchs do.

We already have a permanent dis empowered unclass. See: the fruit pickers in your second paragraph.

Anyway, Plyler v Doe is going to be challenged soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she feel the need to reassure everyone? People here illegally should be deported period.

You're so stupid. First of all, at the rate of 500 deportations a day, it would take us 60 years to deport the people already here, and that doesn't take into account all the people who will continue or overstay their visas.

Also, have you not noticed that no one is picking the for in California right now, in fear of raids? Do you not realize how much our economy depends on migrant labor?

Finally...she feels the need to reassure students because they have the constitutional right to a public education. Yep. The right to it, guaranteed by the 14th amendment. And anyone with half a brain knows that educating everyone is good for all of us. Unless you have an interest in a permanent disempowered underclass, as oligarchs do.

Having our food supply depend on foreigners is a national security problem.

Having our food supply depend on the exploitation of said foreigners is an ethical problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she feel the need to reassure everyone? People here illegally should be deported period.

You're so stupid. First of all, at the rate of 500 deportations a day, it would take us 60 years to deport the people already here, and that doesn't take into account all the people who will continue or overstay their visas.

Also, have you not noticed that no one is picking the for in California right now, in fear of raids? Do you not realize how much our economy depends on migrant labor?

Finally...she feels the need to reassure students because they have the constitutional right to a public education. Yep. The right to it, guaranteed by the 14th amendment. And anyone with half a brain knows that educating everyone is good for all of us. Unless you have an interest in a permanent disempowered underclass, as oligarchs do.

Having our food supply depend on foreigners is a national security problem.

Having our food supply depend on the exploitation of said foreigners is an ethical problem.

And the fix is to let the food rot? No. The fix should have happened a loooooong time ago, involved the companies and the CEOs of those companies that grow food, and been implemented slowly while ensuring we can still eat.

[Anonymous]

Finally...she feels the need to reassure students because they have the constitutional right to a public education. Yep. The right to it, guaranteed by the 14th amendment. And anyone with half a brain knows that educating everyone is good for all of us. Unless you have an interest in a permanent disempowered underclass, as oligarchs do.

You are mistaken about why they have the right to the education. Yes. They are legally entitled to an education but it has nothing to do with the Fourteenth Amendment.

[Anonymous]

Can’t all the Feds without jobs go pick fruit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The closing line "We will remain in the light" is unnecessarily passive aggressive by implicitly stating that that new Trump policies represent darkness. This criticism will be interpreted as insubordination by policy makers and damage professional relationships with those implementing new directives.

Beyond its weird political implications, the phrase is just strange. Parents need clear statements rather than abstract language that’s oddly religious.

+1 this exactly