Are Univ Utah and Univ of Wisconsin roughly in the same tier academically?

[Anonymous]

They are both solid, large state flagships. There is no difference.

[Anonymous]

They are almost the same.

[Anonymous]

They are vastly different academically. Wisconsion is superior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“I’m pretty sure Wisconsin has never spent money on advertising to high schoolers like NEU, Michigan and USC…”

I didn’t know that Michigan spends huge amounts money on advertising? Please cite your sources.

They’re always at Bronx high school of science college fair advertising Also at Sidwell friends college fair. Only a handful of kids choose Wisconsin from these schools. I suppose, given their location, that is an incredible fact in itself. Still, dozens choose Michigan and USC, despite the small academic difference between all three of these schools.

Bronx High School is a top feeder to U of M. Why would it be unusual to have a rep at their college fair? That's a job that reps do.

https://www.michigandaily.com/news/academics/we-looked-301-high-schools-most-applicants-u-m-heres-what-we-found/

[Anonymous]

Wisconsin is significantly above Utah - probably firmly in the middle of the UI-UC, Georgia, Minnesota, Maryland, UMass tier, I’d say. A solid notch down from the Texas, UNC, UVA, UF, Washington tier, which is a solid second notch down from the top public tier of UCLA, Berkeley, Michigan.

If given the opportunity, Wisconsin makes more sense for more people (over Utah).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D wants a colder, outdoorsy college that’s fun. Pretty sure these are both the same for academics, both okay at business and law and I can’t think of any other departments which actually matters. Also looking at U Vermont and Colby College in Maine.

Since law school is a grad program, the quality of the university's law school is irrelevant if the student is thinking about applying to law school down the road. In addition, undergrad prestige plays little role in law school admission. For the purpose of law school admission, Utah and Wisconsin are equivalent.

Bro if that’s true then Wisconsin would be equal to UVA academically. If we’re just going off of academic programs than Wisco has the same or better rankings as UVA’s academic departments. But to say such a thing would be an absurdity. Business and Law makes you elite, therefore UVA is better.

Aside from the fact that you are incorrect, you are missing the point of my post. If OP is planning to apply to law school later, undergrad prestige is unimportant in law school admission. For the individual undergrad student applying to top law schools, there will be zero difference in top law school admission outcomes between applying as an undergrad from U Wisconsin or applying as an undergrad from U Utah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I only know two kids who went to Utah and both transferred out after freshman year. It's very in-state heavy, compared to Wisconsin, and Utah is its own culture.

U Colorado
Colorado College
Bates
Lawrence University

I know ALOT of kids who went to Utah OOS and none transferred out freshman year. It is no longer AS state heavy as it used to be, but still very instate heavy (73% - comparative to UMass but less OOS students than Wisconsin)

It is much easier to gain acceptance to Utah than Wisconsin - but, conversely, Utah gives good merit money to OOS and their honors college perks are not bad. It's also a Tier 1 Research institution with a good med school, business school and a decent law school. It's a beautiful place to spend four years if you are outsdoorsy (climbing or skiing). SLC is like Austin - an island of liberalism in the midst of serious conservatism - and it is VERY crunchy due to the influx of the outdoorsy types (lots of vegan restaurants, live music, bars, thriving LGBTQ scene). You can be climbing in 30 minutes - and easy to go to top climbing spots in the country. Yes, a car is preferable for climbing - but there is always someone going and organized trips through the climbing club. Same for skiing. UVM is not a Tier 1 Research institution. This may be important to your child because Tier 1 gets more grant money etc, so offers more opportunities for internships etc. BUT, UVM is MUCH smaller than Utah, so not as much competition for the opportunities that are available. and Colby is MUCH smaller than both - and not a university.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wisconsin is significantly above Utah - probably firmly in the middle of the UI-UC, Georgia, Minnesota, Maryland, UMass tier, I’d say. A solid notch down from the Texas, UNC, UVA, UF, Washington tier, which is a solid second notch down from the top public tier of UCLA, Berkeley, Michigan.

If given the opportunity, Wisconsin makes more sense for more people (over Utah).

Who is this asshat who keeps claiming Florida is better than Wisconsin? This is the type of person who votes for trump . Just another completely clueless idiot, yet so confident in his stupidity. The Wisconsin booster is insecure and almost certainly a 20 year old college student ( see Jeff’s comments on his location months ago).

Yet still, this Florida/Washington booster is the single biggest idiot on this thread. No department at Florida comes anywhere close to Wisconsin. They are two radically different universities. The only difference is that Florida has 22 million people, while Wisconsin has 5 million making Florida more competitive.

Would any intelligent, rational being chose Florida over Wisconsin? No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wisconsin is significantly above Utah - probably firmly in the middle of the UI-UC, Georgia, Minnesota, Maryland, UMass tier, I’d say. A solid notch down from the Texas, UNC, UVA, UF, Washington tier, which is a solid second notch down from the top public tier of UCLA, Berkeley, Michigan.

If given the opportunity, Wisconsin makes more sense for more people (over Utah).

Who is this asshat who keeps claiming Florida is better than Wisconsin? This is the type of person who votes for trump . Just another completely clueless idiot, yet so confident in his stupidity. The Wisconsin booster is insecure and almost certainly a 20 year old college student ( see Jeff’s comments on his location months ago).

Yet still, this Florida/Washington booster is the single biggest idiot on this thread. No department at Florida comes anywhere close to Wisconsin. They are two radically different universities. The only difference is that Florida has 22 million people, while Wisconsin has 5 million making Florida more competitive.

Would any intelligent, rational being chose Florida over Wisconsin? No.

Calm yourself, check the rankings, the acceptance rates, and the incoming student stats.

[Anonymous]

“Would any intelligent, rational being chose Florida over Wisconsin? No.”

Your comment is no better than the person you were chiding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wisconsin is significantly above Utah - probably firmly in the middle of the UI-UC, Georgia, Minnesota, Maryland, UMass tier, I’d say. A solid notch down from the Texas, UNC, UVA, UF, Washington tier, which is a solid second notch down from the top public tier of UCLA, Berkeley, Michigan.

If given the opportunity, Wisconsin makes more sense for more people (over Utah).

Who is this asshat who keeps claiming Florida is better than Wisconsin? This is the type of person who votes for trump . Just another completely clueless idiot, yet so confident in his stupidity. The Wisconsin booster is insecure and almost certainly a 20 year old college student ( see Jeff’s comments on his location months ago).

Yet still, this Florida/Washington booster is the single biggest idiot on this thread. No department at Florida comes anywhere close to Wisconsin. They are two radically different universities. The only difference is that Florida has 22 million people, while Wisconsin has 5 million making Florida more competitive.

Would any intelligent, rational being chose Florida over Wisconsin? No.

Extensive vocabulary I see.

[Anonymous]

Utah is a no go if you’re not Mormon. And no these two universities are not equal. University of Wisconsin is far better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wisconsin is significantly above Utah - probably firmly in the middle of the UI-UC, Georgia, Minnesota, Maryland, UMass tier, I’d say. A solid notch down from the Texas, UNC, UVA, UF, Washington tier, which is a solid second notch down from the top public tier of UCLA, Berkeley, Michigan.

If given the opportunity, Wisconsin makes more sense for more people (over Utah).

Who is this asshat who keeps claiming Florida is better than Wisconsin? This is the type of person who votes for trump . Just another completely clueless idiot, yet so confident in his stupidity. The Wisconsin booster is insecure and almost certainly a 20 year old college student ( see Jeff’s comments on his location months ago).

Yet still, this Florida/Washington booster is the single biggest idiot on this thread. No department at Florida comes anywhere close to Wisconsin. They are two radically different universities. The only difference is that Florida has 22 million people, while Wisconsin has 5 million making Florida more competitive.

Would any intelligent, rational being chose Florida over Wisconsin? No.

What exactly is your personal connection to Wisconsin that you lash out at strangers on the internet and other schools that are higher ranked, have far lower acceptance rates, and whose accepted students have much more impressive stats?

Are you from Wisconsin? Did you attend UW? Did your kid(s) or other loved ones? Are you admin, faculty or staff?

Why the shrieking?

[Anonymous]

C'mon. It's Wisconsin. Not many care. Kids I see getting in are solid students but 2 tiers down from the top at our private hs. Fun place. Good solid school. From having lived in Chicago, plenty of successful grads & good people. No shame attending. No shame attending any school. But no matter the amt of crying & butthurt, it's not Cal, Ucla, Michigan, UVA, UNC level from a national perspective. It's the school I see decent students from surburban Chicago choose when they don't get NU nor Michigan. & they don't want Illinois.

[Anonymous]

To be quite frank, no one is going to look at a schools like Wisconsin and Utah and think there is that much of a difference. They are both state schools. They are both very large. They are not very selective at all. When you admit almost half of those who apply that's just the reality. Same thing with yield. When your yield is under 30% that tells you that the school is considered a backup.

I don't know why this dose of reality makes some people mad. You can get a great outcome from either school. Go on to law school, nursing school, become a teacher, work as an engineer.