| Had my third at 40 and still (67 years now) wish I'd had just one more... |
She already has 3 kids. |
|
Normally I would say no BUT this is different. I say no to 3, but if you have 3 then you need a 4th. Never stop with an uneven number. Your middle is screwed unless there are 2 middles, then everyone is unique again. Have the 4th!
I'm a middle that would never do that to anyone. If I accidentally had 3, I would purposefully have 4. |
|
NO. OP, NO!
Your chances of having an SN kid keeps increasing as you age. Do you remember what happened to the last Duggar kid because Mama Duggar won't stop breeding like a rabbit? |
+1 |
|
Your oldest kid is 9?
That is a great age. The teenage years are yet to come and they can be wild and unpredictable. Three is a good number. Be grateful and enjoy your beautiful family as is |
| We thought about it in my late 30s but decided no when we looked out 15-20 years in terms of what we wanted our lives to look like. We never discussed it as a money issue, it was all about where we wanted to be in life. It was the right decision even though I adored babies. Now I have grand babies so I’m happy. |
Oh wow. Had my third at 34 and very glad we didn’t go for a fourth. We are swamped with kids’ activities! |
| No way. Don’t do it |
Same! And the third often has to tag along. Anyone who’s sat in a steaming hot high school natatorium for several hours knows the pain |
A 70 yr old just gave birth! https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-67577038 |
| You probably shouldn’t have had the third. A fourth shouldn’t even be contemplated |
Just because you can doesn’t mean you should. |
Why? |
|
Good lord, no.
Stop trying to fill a void in your life with children. |