My Israeli tour guide gives a lot of evangelical Christian tours as well. Basically regarding the differing beliefs, he tells them, if Jesus comes back - and what you think happens, I'll eat my hat. And if it doesn't happen, you will eat your hat. |
They definitely think with the Jews in control of Israel, the messiah will return. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/05/14/half-of-evangelicals-support-israel-because-they-believe-it-is-important-for-fulfilling-end-times-prophecy/ The LifeWay poll found that 80 percent of evangelicals believed that the creation of Israel in 1948 was a fulfillment of biblical prophecy that would bring about Christ’s return. |
Most christians do not believe in the a literal reading of the book of revelation. Even among evangelicals there are different beliefs about the rapture/tribulations/etc. I grew up in an evangelical church and we were taught about the rapture, but, we were taught the Jews were god's chosen people and they would be saved along with christians. Everybody else is sol apparently. |
Is this really the only reason though? Don’t you think most of these types of people find Muslims more foreign and less our kind of people than Jews? It’s not strictly true but most people think of Jewish Israeli as basically European. Judeo-Christian culture is a thing. Most of the Bible is the Torah. Christo-Islamic is not. I don’t think the affinity is all about the rapture. |
Extra points as opposed to a Muslim? This makes no sense. |
It’s based on an interpretation of the Bible that arose in the late 1800s by fringe Christian sects and then was further popularized in recent decades by modern Evangelicals and the Left Behind book series. Good overview of Dispensationalism: https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/jews-and-the-rapture |
They’re overwhelmingly white and see Israelis as whiter (closer to white, not identical to them) than the other side. That helps. Of course you would not see that association among Arab Christians that you’re familiar with as their ethnic association cuts the other way. |
I've known about this theology for a while, but seeing it written out turns my stomach. Isn't it nice to know that there are people in power that believe this shit???? |
Who is “in power” who *actually* believes this? |
I'm this PP, and yes, I have met evangelicals that believe this. It's not as rare as some would like to think |
Are you aware of what “lapsed” means? |
+1 So many utter nut jobs on this thread, just spewing garbage left and right. |
It is an interpretation of Revelations. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it originated in the 1970s with a book called The Late Great Planet Earth and has subsequently grown into a kind of Evangelical dogma but mainstream Protestant and Catholic churches do not believe in it. |
No I was taught in evangelical church that Jews - since they are the chosen people- would get a second chance to follow Jesus in the end times. |
No. It's not in Revelation at all. Revelation is a piece of genre writing -- apocalyptic; a genre that was actually pretty popular 2k years ago. "Revelation," the last book in the Christian Bible, is mostly a political text condemning Roman rule, or certain aspects of it and leaders anyway, in a way that is cryptic enough to save the skins of the early Christians who wrote it and passed it about. They used the apocalypse genre to obscure things. Why do that? At the time, the people who agreed with what they had written in it, understood it pretty clearly. It was an IYKYK thing. The brilliance of it at the time -- using a crazy sounding end-of-the-world story (again, a popular genre at the time) to both hide and convey secret meaning at the same time -- is what causes so much trouble now. If the only way to understand it then was IYKYK, there is no chance any of us can fully understand it now. (But there are brilliant scholars who understand enough for us to know basically what the book is -- an anti Rome political tract -- and what the writer(s) was attempting to accomplish.) The inherently cryptic and strange nature of the work, combined with the fact that 2k years later we have zero context, allows all kinds of folks to advocate for any message they want to see in there. Like literally anything. And the Evangelicals have gone pretty nuts on it. But I think any literal interpretation of just about any part of the Bible is missing much of, if not the whole, point. I am a Christian who loves the bible, fwiw. I think of the issue with ancient genre writing this way: Picture 2k years from now someone not only removed in time but far removed from the English language and the Western Civ of our time picks up, oh, say, The Lord of the Rings. And then they and their friends start arguing over whether or not there were elves and hobbits and what not "back then." The consensus becomes that people 2k years ago were completely ridiculous because they believed in these imaginary things. Well, no, of course not -- you have to take genre into account. And our imaginary readers don't know what fantasy writing is. People write about hobbits and elves for all kinds of reasons including entertainment, wanting to convey certain values, etc. Taken out of context The Lord of the Rings is nonsense. And of course that misses the whole point. But easy to do if you don't have the whole context. |