My stipulation traveling with ILS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

[Anonymous]

So really, you can’t tolerate an 8 hour drive with someone? Sounds like a you problem. Toughen up, buttercup.

And think of the environment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

You tried it. My grandfather was a surgeon that was sought-after, renowned and funded, and had a procedure named after him. He came from money. He was so cheap that when he traveled and had to stay in a hotel, he always chose the budget ones with the free breakfast. Once he visited the DC area and invited me to “have breakfast with him” at his hotel, which was about an hour from me. He meant the free hotel breakfast at his hotel. I could go on with other family members and friends of our family. If you know you know.

[Anonymous]

Another vote for ILs drive their own car. I wouldn’t want the ILs tagging along with me for small outings once at the vacation property or relying on me for transportation once there. Also prefer the ability to have an exit plan in case the ILs get too annoying and I want to leave early.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

You tried it. My grandfather was a surgeon that was sought-after, renowned and funded, and had a procedure named after him. He came from money. He was so cheap that when he traveled and had to stay in a hotel, he always chose the budget ones with the free breakfast. Once he visited the DC area and invited me to “have breakfast with him” at his hotel, which was about an hour from me. He meant the free hotel breakfast at his hotel. I could go on with other family members and friends of our family. If you know you know.

Your grandfather was cheap, but not stupid. There's a difference. So, you tried it with your one example but you haven't proved that wealthy people do stupid things that waste their time.

[Anonymous]

I would absolutely hate the inflexibility of the one car. Even just the 8 hours where everything will be a consensus decision (where to eat lunch, bathroom breaks.) For us - as boring as 8 in a car can be its also time we as a couple can spend together. Decompressing from our jobs on way there, planning on way back.
You don’t need to make up a reason - its just no. And yeah - they don’t get a vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

You tried it. My grandfather was a surgeon that was sought-after, renowned and funded, and had a procedure named after him. He came from money. He was so cheap that when he traveled and had to stay in a hotel, he always chose the budget ones with the free breakfast. Once he visited the DC area and invited me to “have breakfast with him” at his hotel, which was about an hour from me. He meant the free hotel breakfast at his hotel. I could go on with other family members and friends of our family. If you know you know.

Your grandfather was cheap, but not stupid. There's a difference. So, you tried it with your one example but you haven't proved that wealthy people do stupid things that waste their time.

They do, though. Wealthy people can be cheap, stupid, clingy, anxious, overbearing, stifling, etc., just like everyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

You tried it. My grandfather was a surgeon that was sought-after, renowned and funded, and had a procedure named after him. He came from money. He was so cheap that when he traveled and had to stay in a hotel, he always chose the budget ones with the free breakfast. Once he visited the DC area and invited me to “have breakfast with him” at his hotel, which was about an hour from me. He meant the free hotel breakfast at his hotel. I could go on with other family members and friends of our family. If you know you know.

Your grandfather was cheap, but not stupid. There's a difference. So, you tried it with your one example but you haven't proved that wealthy people do stupid things that waste their time.

They do, though. Wealthy people can be cheap, stupid, clingy, anxious, overbearing, stifling, etc., just like everyone else.

Yes but wealthy people don't 1) own timeshares and 2) share a ride in a small SUV with kids, dogs, luggage, and whatever. This is not how the 1% travels and it's funny that people seem to think it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

You tried it. My grandfather was a surgeon that was sought-after, renowned and funded, and had a procedure named after him. He came from money. He was so cheap that when he traveled and had to stay in a hotel, he always chose the budget ones with the free breakfast. Once he visited the DC area and invited me to “have breakfast with him” at his hotel, which was about an hour from me. He meant the free hotel breakfast at his hotel. I could go on with other family members and friends of our family. If you know you know.

Your grandfather was cheap, but not stupid. There's a difference. So, you tried it with your one example but you haven't proved that wealthy people do stupid things that waste their time.

They do, though. Wealthy people can be cheap, stupid, clingy, anxious, overbearing, stifling, etc., just like everyone else.

Yes but wealthy people don't 1) own timeshares and 2) share a ride in a small SUV with kids, dogs, luggage, and whatever. This is not how the 1% travels and it's funny that people seem to think it is.

This is totally how even wealthy older adults would try to finagle a ride because they actually are anxious about driving long distances, and even driving around to restaurants and such when they arrive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

You tried it. My grandfather was a surgeon that was sought-after, renowned and funded, and had a procedure named after him. He came from money. He was so cheap that when he traveled and had to stay in a hotel, he always chose the budget ones with the free breakfast. Once he visited the DC area and invited me to “have breakfast with him” at his hotel, which was about an hour from me. He meant the free hotel breakfast at his hotel. I could go on with other family members and friends of our family. If you know you know.

Your grandfather was cheap, but not stupid. There's a difference. So, you tried it with your one example but you haven't proved that wealthy people do stupid things that waste their time.

They do, though. Wealthy people can be cheap, stupid, clingy, anxious, overbearing, stifling, etc., just like everyone else.

Yes but wealthy people don't 1) own timeshares and 2) share a ride in a small SUV with kids, dogs, luggage, and whatever. This is not how the 1% travels and it's funny that people seem to think it is.

You’re right. We ARE talking about the other 99% of the population.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

You tried it. My grandfather was a surgeon that was sought-after, renowned and funded, and had a procedure named after him. He came from money. He was so cheap that when he traveled and had to stay in a hotel, he always chose the budget ones with the free breakfast. Once he visited the DC area and invited me to “have breakfast with him” at his hotel, which was about an hour from me. He meant the free hotel breakfast at his hotel. I could go on with other family members and friends of our family. If you know you know.

Your grandfather was cheap, but not stupid. There's a difference. So, you tried it with your one example but you haven't proved that wealthy people do stupid things that waste their time.

They do, though. Wealthy people can be cheap, stupid, clingy, anxious, overbearing, stifling, etc., just like everyone else.

Yes but wealthy people don't 1) own timeshares and 2) share a ride in a small SUV with kids, dogs, luggage, and whatever. This is not how the 1% travels and it's funny that people seem to think it is.

You’re right. We ARE talking about the other 99% of the population.

What is the definition of wealthy? Because typical middle class vacations is not it in my book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

NP. Really do get over yourself. This comes up all the time, and sorry, but Just No, Boomer. Most DCUM posters have their own money, and in many cases, a lot more money than their parents and ILs. Personally, DH and I pay our share of extended family vacations, but even if someone else is paying, a "free vacation" isn't the prize you think it is. Go into the Search function, type in "beach drama," and you'll see what I mean.

Like, some rental in Sandbridge just ain't high luxury, OK? No one wants a long car ride with people who aren't in their immediate family. Get over it.

These aren't rich people problems. The wealthy don't bum rides in cramped automobiles or drive 8 hours when they can fly in 2 and rent a car. People who consider these ideas and then actually do them don't have a lot of choices or financial freedom to make better choices.

Sure they do--the Stage 5 Clingers who want more, more, more time and more, more, more access totally would pull this. Some of the wealthiest people I know are also the cheapest--haven't you noticed the news articles about Warren Buffet and his wife complaining about $4 coffee lately?

That one article about his Buffett's wife proves your theory? No, I don't think there is an epidemic of wealthy people cramming into sedans or hybrid SUVs to drive hundreds of miles to stay in a shitty time share. These aren't wealthy people.

You tried it. My grandfather was a surgeon that was sought-after, renowned and funded, and had a procedure named after him. He came from money. He was so cheap that when he traveled and had to stay in a hotel, he always chose the budget ones with the free breakfast. Once he visited the DC area and invited me to “have breakfast with him” at his hotel, which was about an hour from me. He meant the free hotel breakfast at his hotel. I could go on with other family members and friends of our family. If you know you know.

Your grandfather was cheap, but not stupid. There's a difference. So, you tried it with your one example but you haven't proved that wealthy people do stupid things that waste their time.

They do, though. Wealthy people can be cheap, stupid, clingy, anxious, overbearing, stifling, etc., just like everyone else.

Yes but wealthy people don't 1) own timeshares and 2) share a ride in a small SUV with kids, dogs, luggage, and whatever. This is not how the 1% travels and it's funny that people seem to think it is.

You’re right. We ARE talking about the other 99% of the population.

What is the definition of wealthy? Because typical middle class vacations is not it in my book.

According to PP, only the top 1% is wealthy. I’m hoping she will see herself out now as we are clearly talking about the poors and her references aren’t pertinent to the facts we know here.

[Anonymous]

Yup, you have too much baby stuff. If they really want, you drive with the kids, DH drives with them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just tell them that you are happy to use them for a free vacation so long as you don’t have to drive with them. I’m sure they’ll understand.

Spending a week with the in-laws is hardly a vacation. It’s an obligation.