Nothing here is wrong, but it is missing context. The mom in this situation for years has had all of her children chip in on a gift for her birthday, all without her needing to say anything. Why would she have said something now? If that all of a sudden stops and she has no reason why, she could be understandably hurt. So the question is whether OP does nothing (a change from years of traditional behavior) and let's her mother be hurt on her 70th birthday. That is not a choice I would make. I care more about my mother not being hurt on her birthday that standing in my righteousness against my siblings. I do however agree that OP should make very clear that this is the last time she is the only one putting in effort. I also think OP should examine how she is being used by her siblings and change it. But the time to do that is not hours before a milestone birthday. |
What does that have to do with anything? |
This. You can’t and shouldn’t control everything. |
Ugh, I can’t imagine being 23 and having a 70 year old mother. |
|
Does your mom even care about gifts?
I personally don’t care about gifts but a simple phone call from kids saying happy birthday would be nice |
Op, if you're local to your mom, I kind of agree with this. In my family, I'd still get together for the birthday lunch/dinner, especially since the birthday trip was months ago. I wouldn't do another gift, although I would probably feel obligated to help pay for her meal. Just curious if you told your siblings you wouldn't be joining them for whatever they planned? |
You poor fragile thing. |
No, it would just suck. You’ll very likely lose your mother before you’re 35. I notice there’s no mention of Dad in any of this—he’s likely already gone. That’s shitty. |