It’s pretty interesting to see that that it’s people that are the problem and not the built environment. These people grew up in the suburbs with white flight values and they blamed the suburban built environment for their problems. But lo and behold, look at how they have brought their culture to the cities. It’s absolutely insane. Like entire premises of academic study and culture are being upended because we’re finding out that it’s all just been projection. These peoples misery has nothing to do with cars and density and everything to do with who they are and how they behave. 30 years ago in the suburbs they were trying to get make neighbors like them so uncomfortable that they would move. Here they have moved to the city and they are doing it all over again. |
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-vehicle-registration-will-more-than-triple-for-some-suvs-trucks-by-2024/3063961/ Lol oh look more crazy right wing lies. |
You understand that just because you say something is “true” that doesn’t mean it is, right? It is still just an opinion, even if it’s yours. You just sound angry and any argument you might have is lost in name calling and ranting. |
Um, what they were complaining about wasn't an opinion. It was a fact. What % is the proposed increase. |
They want all trucks to pay at least 240% more than a typical car because they are trucks and then want to give special breaks to Tesla owners. If the purpose of the tax is supposedly for safety, they shouldn’t have a Tesla exception. They should instead be using the tax to encourage DC residents to buy Nissan Leafs. But this is this is where they show that it’s not about safety and all about using the tax code to punish working class people because they want to get them out of the city. |
There is a specific carve out for Telsas and not electric vehicles in general? Yeah, that's a problem. |
seems like you absolutely can’t stand change of any type. heavier vehicles are more dangerous and generally take up more space. |
I agree with you. Heavier vehicles are more dangerous, which is why all those supremely heavy Tesla EVs get an exemption while much lighter light-duty trucks get punished. Or did I miss something? |
A Nissan Leaf is 3500 lbs. A Tesla Model 3 is 4200 lbs. The Tesla should be taxed more but it’s not because of the 1,000 lb EV exception, which is just a death subsidy for rich EV drivers. |
NP. Depending on trim a Nissan Leaf has a curb weight between 3,512 and 3,934 pounds. The Model 3 is between 3,557 and 4,180. They're in the same weight range and either could be taxed at either side of the 3,600 pound rate if there wasn't the 1,000 pound exception for EVs. |
It's more remarkable to see someone defending their massive Suburban as some kind of necessary non-white transportation imperative? Does your own version of vibrant urbanism revolve around a Suburban or a Tahoe? How odd, and weirdly specific. |
What's more dangerous are tall vehicles. Leaf and Tesla both have good pedestrian visibility. |
So what you are saying is that the lightest EV is the same weight as the lightest truck and yet one is taxed 240% of the other based on bias? |
Then why isn't that tax based on ground clearance or bumper height? |
| Public policy interest in encouraging adoption of electric vehicles and a move away from gas-powered vehicles. Classic use of the power of the purse to drive behavior. |