
Absolute BS and you know it. Why do you keep ignoring the citations REPEATEDLY posted here? Rhetorical question - we know why you're ignoring inconvenient facts. Republicans are the ONLY people who have come up with specific new border legislation proposals. And who are they waiting on to pass the bill? DEMOCRATS. Get your facts straight. "A group of Senate Republicans have released their proposal to overhaul border policies from security to parole and asylum changes. The group, made up of Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Tom Cotton (R-Okla.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.), has been meeting for weeks to try and put forth a border proposal with significant policy changes, not just additional funding for Border Patrol. Border security: The proposal would bring back construction of the border wall and boost retention for Border Patrol agents, including changes to overtime benefits. It would also reimplement DNA testing at the border. Asylum changes: This plan would make migrants ineligible for asylum if they transited through another country before showing up at the U.S. border, implementing what is called a “safe third country” rule. It would raise the bar of “credible fear” for asylum seekers from “significant possibility” to “more likely than not” in their home country. Migrants would be required to request asylum at a port of entry. Parole changes: Parole would be limited to one year with the possibility of a one-year extension and would bar the Department of Homeland Security from “using class-based criteria to grant humanitarian parole.” It would codify the Cuban Family Reunification Program and spousal and children reunification for active duty military service members. Authority similar to Title 42: This proposal would allow the broad suspension of entry for certain types of migrants, referred to as “inadmissible aliens,” if DHS decides it is necessary to “achieve operational control.” This authority is similar to Title 42, which allowed the U.S. to quickly turn back migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border for public health reasons during the Covid-19 pandemic. The policy would also revive the controversial “remain in Mexico” policy that keeps asylum seekers outside the United States while their cases are processed. Many Democrats have said that if the border measures include that policy then they won’t accept the measures." https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/11...r-proposals-00125583 |
You've already posted this. The Biden administration is indeed accountable for LETTING MILLIONS of illegal immigrants into the U.S. That's the issue, here. |
You're really going to keep up the gaslighting, huh? Ok. Every time you post this idiocy, we'll just keep reposting what has already been posted, multiple times. A group of Senate Republicans have released their proposal to overhaul border policies from security to parole and asylum changes. The group, made up of Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Tom Cotton (R-Okla.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.), has been meeting for weeks to try and put forth a border proposal with significant policy changes, not just additional funding for Border Patrol. Border security: The proposal would bring back construction of the border wall and boost retention for Border Patrol agents, including changes to overtime benefits. It would also reimplement DNA testing at the border. Asylum changes: This plan would make migrants ineligible for asylum if they transited through another country before showing up at the U.S. border, implementing what is called a “safe third country” rule. It would raise the bar of “credible fear” for asylum seekers from “significant possibility” to “more likely than not” in their home country. Migrants would be required to request asylum at a port of entry. Parole changes: Parole would be limited to one year with the possibility of a one-year extension and would bar the Department of Homeland Security from “using class-based criteria to grant humanitarian parole.” It would codify the Cuban Family Reunification Program and spousal and children reunification for active duty military service members. Authority similar to Title 42: This proposal would allow the broad suspension of entry for certain types of migrants, referred to as “inadmissible aliens,” if DHS decides it is necessary to “achieve operational control.” This authority is similar to Title 42, which allowed the U.S. to quickly turn back migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border for public health reasons during the Covid-19 pandemic. The policy would also revive the controversial “remain in Mexico” policy that keeps asylum seekers outside the United States while their cases are processed. Many Democrats have said that if the border measures include that policy then they won’t accept the measures. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/11...r-proposals-00125583 |
+1 The PP is either a troll or embarrassingly uniformed and ignorant. |
He's absolutely right. He made no definitive claim about Iranian sleeper cells - he simply said it's "entirely possible" they exist in the U.S., seeing as 6,000,000 people have entered this country since Biden took office, and almost 2,000,000 are "gotaways" about whom no one has any information AT ALL. Of course it's possible. What is happening at the border is an unprecedented national security crisis, and Joe Biden has allowed it to happen. |
Please keep this up. Please. |
+100 Exactly. I have to (almost) laugh at the imbeciles still throwing out "Racist!! Nazi!!" to anyone who is in favor of reforming the border. Makes it crystal clear who is in favor of allowing millions and millions of unknown, unidentified illegal immigrants into the country. |
+1 This woman is a joke. And the people who lap up the nonsense she spews are even worse. |
Aren’t you embarrassed constantly trying to deflect blame for this? It doesn’t mean Biden is awful at everything, but if you deflect about this, it just makes it impossible to take you seriously. Np. |
Let's see what the Comms Director left out of his posting..... $1.4 billion in grants to local governments and nonprofit organizations for temporary food, shelter, and other services for recently arrived migrants. Equipping Southwest border ports of entry with new technology, including non-intrusive inspection equipment to detect drugs, like fentanyl and other illegal substances, as well as the smuggling of humans through checkpoints. An additional 300 Border Patrol processing coordinators to work alongside Border Patrol agents assisting with the intake of undocumented migrants. An additional 1,600 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services asylum officers to help hear asylum claims and expedite removals from the United States. And 30 new USCIS officers to process work-authorization requests from migrants. Additional Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities to hold asylum-seekers. Funds to transport migrants, including an increase in removal and deportation flights. Providing non-custodial housing options for asylum-seekers, like community-based residential housing facilities with medical and legal facilities. An additional 1,470 lawyers and support staff to assist 375 new immigration judge teams to process immigration cases. There are currently 2.6 million backlogged immigration cases — the most ever, according to Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. https://www.borderreport.com/regions/washington-d-c/heres-how-biden-wants-to-spend-13-6-billion-from-congress-on-the-border/ More money will not solve the problem. There needs to be an immediate change in policies. Something Biden will not do. Here is more....... This supplemental request is asking to continue failed policies. For example, the $4.4 billion for U.S. Customs and Border Protection is for processing illegal aliens and transporting them to the American community of their choice instead of deterring illegal immigration and enforcing the law. Additionally, an undeclared amount of your taxpayer dollars would go to the non-governmental organizations that prioritize offering shelter, food, clothing and other resources for illegal aliens over poor Americans. Unsurprisingly, there is no money dedicated to building the border wall system that the Biden administration recently declared an "immediate and acute" need to thwart illegal immigration. Much of the rest of the request is the functional equivalent of an illegal alien slush fund. That includes $1.85 billion in welfare payments to illegal aliens from Cuba and Haiti and $755 million to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a component of the Department of Homeland Security that is supposed to be funded by fees instead of taxpayer dollars. Rather than dealing with the issue of illegal aliens, this money would be used to speed up the approval of work permits for millions of them whom the Biden administration has allowed into the country. Furthermore, the State Department would receive $1.3 billion to support and promote "safe, orderly, and humane migration," which is Biden administration lingo for its unlawful categorical parole programs. Lastly, though the nearly $4 billion to hire additional immigration judges and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement attorneys sounds good, it does not provide a near-term solution. The time it will take to hire and onboard all these people will do nothing in the immediate term to stop the record flow of illegal aliens coming to the country. And removal orders from judges are meaningless if they are not enforced. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/congress-should-reject-bidens-border-supplemental-fund-proven-policies-instead |
Yeah we’re gonna have to agree to disagree. I’m satisfied with the above. Just admit you want troops on the border firing on migrants. Most of us aren’t ever going to be ok with that. |
WTF? I want the person who is supposedly leading our country to actually give a damn about the citizens here and take action to secure the border. Instead, he is doing everything he can to ensure more migrants enter illegally. |
All of the above will help. The WH should have moved sooner on this, but the above is very proactive. |