
OMG, what an absolute joke. "Migrants were caught crossing the southern border of the United States more times in the past year than in any other year since at least 1960, when the government started keeping track of the data. There were more than 2.4 million apprehensions in the 2023 fiscal year, which ended in September. That tops the previous record, set a year earlier, of more than 2.3 million, according to government data released on Saturday. During the 2021 fiscal year, there were more than 1.7 million apprehensions." https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/21/us/politics/cbp-record-border-crossings.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/24/us/politics/china-migrants-us-border.html https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/29/us/us-mexico-border-migration/index.html |
It's "Menendez," but I see you're moving the goalposts, as expected. |
+1 Yep. But the PP will continue to gaslight, as we've all come to expect. It's what Democrats do when they know they're to blame. Utter cowards. |
DP. Wow. You really haven't been keeping up with the news, have you? So uninformed. Educate yourself next time so you don't appear completely ignorant. A group of Senate Republicans have released their proposal to overhaul border policies from security to parole and asylum changes. The group, made up of Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Tom Cotton (R-Okla.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.), has been meeting for weeks to try and put forth a border proposal with significant policy changes, not just additional funding for Border Patrol. Border security: The proposal would bring back construction of the border wall and boost retention for Border Patrol agents, including changes to overtime benefits. It would also reimplement DNA testing at the border. Asylum changes: This plan would make migrants ineligible for asylum if they transited through another country before showing up at the U.S. border, implementing what is called a “safe third country” rule. It would raise the bar of “credible fear” for asylum seekers from “significant possibility” to “more likely than not” in their home country. Migrants would be required to request asylum at a port of entry. Parole changes: Parole would be limited to one year with the possibility of a one-year extension and would bar the Department of Homeland Security from “using class-based criteria to grant humanitarian parole.” It would codify the Cuban Family Reunification Program and spousal and children reunification for active duty military service members. Authority similar to Title 42: This proposal would allow the broad suspension of entry for certain types of migrants, referred to as “inadmissible aliens,” if DHS decides it is necessary to “achieve operational control.” This authority is similar to Title 42, which allowed the U.S. to quickly turn back migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border for public health reasons during the Covid-19 pandemic. The policy would also revive the controversial “remain in Mexico” policy that keeps asylum seekers outside the United States while their cases are processed. Many Democrats have said that if the border measures include that policy then they won’t accept the measures. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/11/06/congress/senate-gop-border-proposals-00125583 |
DP. My family never applied for amnesty or asylum. Weird projection on your part. At any rate, here is what the proposal is re: asylum. Asylum changes: This plan would make migrants ineligible for asylum if they transited through another country before showing up at the U.S. border, implementing what is called a “safe third country” rule. It would raise the bar of “credible fear” for asylum seekers from “significant possibility” to “more likely than not” in their home country. Migrants would be required to request asylum at a port of entry. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/11/06/congress/senate-gop-border-proposals-00125583 |
What part of "caught" and "apprehended" are you not understanding here? If Biden wanted open borders we wouldn't even be bothering to catch them. Thus, your narrative fails, even based on your own citations. |
OMG, you are too stupid to converse with. |
Just curious what you think "caught" and "apprehended" means when it comes to Biden's border? In Biden world, "caught" and "apprehended" means that the migrants transverse through several safe countries, enter the US illegally - not at ports of entry, are quickly processed by our over-worked border agents (who are not patrolling the border because of the sheer numbers of migrants entering), then are released into the US and given transportation to the cities of their choice. A small fraction of those entering are actually deported. And, these migrants are not really vetted (that is a myth the left promotes) because many of them give fake names or their background cannot be accessed because of the countries from which they come. |
+1 |
The policy would also revive the controversial “remain in Mexico” policy that keeps asylum seekers outside the United States while their cases are processed. Many Democrats have said that if the border measures include that policy then they won’t accept the measures.
And this is why 3 MORE Supreme Court picks will be lost by the democrats. Screw your own citizens. Focus on helping Central America first with free food, free education and free health care. |
It's not just Central America. It is people ACROSS THE WORLD! |
People fleeing poverty and asylum seekers are being politicized by countries who don’t like the US. Nicaragua is now allowing countless airplane charters to fly into Nicaragua from around the world. They get some money and screw the US as these migrants don’t stay in Nicaragua, they immediately leave and travel north to the US. It’s like a snowball as more and more arrive in the US, they post in social media and their friends and family decide to make the journey as well. It’s going to get worse and worse unless something drastic is done. |
Don't count on that happening while Joe is in charge. He doesn't care. |