Biden's VP?

[Anonymous]

It is going to be Gretchen Whitmer. She brings diversity, executive leadership, and excellent retail politician skills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is going to be Gretchen Whitmer. She brings diversity, executive leadership, and excellent retail politician skills.

Nominating the definition of a Karen is not what Biden needs to do in this climate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another update: Joe really isn't sure and will conduct 5-6 one-on-ones rather than the usual 3. Allies are concerned the delay has intensified jockeying, and pitted women against each other. Sigh.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bidens-delay-in-choosing-a-vp-intensifies-jockeying-between-potential-picks/2020/08/02/6eea5068-d4d2-11ea-930e-d88518c57dcc_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-low_bidenveep-755pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans

Ridiculous. These women need to rise above it and stop fitting the stereotype. They need to remember that they are already leading by example. Handle it like a professional.

Yep, blame the woman. That's not sexist!

They are literally the ones responsible for their response. I’m a woman. They need to drop it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is going to be Gretchen Whitmer. She brings diversity, executive leadership, and excellent retail politician skills.

I thought this a few months ago, but now think it will be a WOC.

[Anonymous]

Someone really loves Kamala on this thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is going to be Gretchen Whitmer. She brings diversity, executive leadership, and excellent retail politician skills.

Nominating the definition of a Karen is not what Biden needs to do in this climate.

But why should he pick a black woman just to pick a black woman, especially when the options are underwhelming?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone really loves Kamala on this thread

I know. She's polarizing, people seem to have strong feelings either way. Her devotees are extreme though, and often seem illogical and lacking in substance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone really loves Kamala on this thread

Because Black turnout is critical to a win, and could be depressed if disappointment over a non-Black pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is going to be Gretchen Whitmer. She brings diversity, executive leadership, and excellent retail politician skills.

Nominating the definition of a Karen is not what Biden needs to do in this climate.

Yikes, lobbing racist and sexist slurs is not a good look. Get thee to women's studies 101! Gretchen Whitmer brings executive leadership, and excellent retail politician skills. Biden needs to pick someone experienced on day 1 to lead. She would be an excellent pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone really loves Kamala on this thread

Because Black turnout is critical to a win, and could be depressed if disappointment over a non-Black pick.

There are at least 3 other non-polarizing Black women in the running.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another update: Joe really isn't sure and will conduct 5-6 one-on-ones rather than the usual 3. Allies are concerned the delay has intensified jockeying, and pitted women against each other. Sigh.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bidens-delay-in-choosing-a-vp-intensifies-jockeying-between-potential-picks/2020/08/02/6eea5068-d4d2-11ea-930e-d88518c57dcc_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-low_bidenveep-755pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans

Ridiculous. These women need to rise above it and stop fitting the stereotype. They need to remember that they are already leading by example. Handle it like a professional.

Yep, blame the woman. That's not sexist!

They are literally the ones responsible for their response. I’m a woman. They need to drop it.

So ignorant. What is their "response?" Did you even read the article? The men are pitting women against each other. The women are not playing the game and backstabbing each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone really loves Kamala on this thread

Because Black turnout is critical to a win, and could be depressed if disappointment over a non-Black pick.

There are at least 3 other non-polarizing Black women in the running.

Most African-American people polled do not favor using race as a factor in picking a nominee. They don't care. They want to win. Because the cost of not winning - is quite literally death. Picking Stacey Abrams for optics and losing = death.

[Anonymous]

I guarantee if Biden doesn't pick a Black woman, the other side will weaponize it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is going to be Gretchen Whitmer. She brings diversity, executive leadership, and excellent retail politician skills.

Nominating the definition of a Karen is not what Biden needs to do in this climate.

Yikes, lobbing racist and sexist slurs is not a good look. Get thee to women's studies 101! Gretchen Whitmer brings executive leadership, and excellent retail politician skills. Biden needs to pick someone experienced on day 1 to lead. She would be an excellent pick.

Didn’t she ban people from buying seeds and tile at Home Depot and ban people from going to a second home while her husband was on his way to there second home? She is a textbook authoritarian and a hypocrite to boot. Picking such a polarizing figure does Biden no good. She’ll cost him with moderates and with the “woke” crowd as well.

Biden should buck convention and pick an Asian or a Latino who isn’t polarizing. Xavier Baccera or a left field pick like Yang. Trump is pulling in 30% of Latinos. Picking a Latino VP helps turn the tide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone really loves Kamala on this thread

Because Black turnout is critical to a win, and could be depressed if disappointment over a non-Black pick.

There are at least 3 other non-polarizing Black women in the running.

Most African-American people polled do not favor using race as a factor in picking a nominee. They don't care. They want to win. Because the cost of not winning - is quite literally death. Picking **ANY PERSON for optics ONLY and losing = death.

Literally. We don’t care about anything but winning and getting crap done once we win.